· Private foundation
The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k25 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k54 grants · $702k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING | $150,000 |
| LIFE EXPANDING ADVENTURE PROGRAM | $20,000 |
| PROUD GROUND | $20,000 |
| CHILDREN'S CENTER | $20,000 |
| URBAN GLEANERS | $20,000 |
| UNITY SHELTER | $20,000 |
| WESTSIDE CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| YOUTH PROGRESS ASSOCIATION | $20,000 |
| RETURNING VETERANS PROJECT | $20,000 |
| OREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION | $20,000 |
| YOUTH VILLAGESM INC - OREGON | $20,000 |
| ASSIST | $20,000 |
| NEHALEM BAY HEALTH CENTER & PHARMACY | $20,000 |
| ACRES OF HOPE | $20,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CENTRAL OREGON | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $492k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
51 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 47 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $503k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE2× · 2021–2023 · $1.5M · revenue +19%
OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING4× · 2020–2024 · $700k · revenue +20%- CLCivics Learning Project4× · 2020–2024 · $51k · revenue +45%
Funded once
Home Share Oregonone grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue -67%- DLDE LA SALLE NORTH CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2020 · $25k
- LPLA PINE COMMUNITY KITCHENone grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue -10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…
To ensure children and youth in oregon have access to high quality, comprehensive services and resources to address child abuse.
To connect individuals to the housing and community resources they seek.
At l'arche portland people with and without developmental disabilities create home and build community together. we nurture long-term mutual relationships that reveal the gifts of people with developmental disabilities. in doing so we…
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
Friends - portland commits to standing alongside our community's youth as they work to overcome barriers to their success. each child receives 1:1 support and guidance from a salaried, professional mentor (called a friend), from…
To provide youth in crisis a place of physical and emotional safety while assisting them to build positive relationships and develop their individual potentials.
To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.
To lead oregon's casa programs to provide a strong voice for every abused and neglected child
Building brighter futures with children and families.
A family for every child (affec) is dedicated to finding permanent and loving adoptive families for waiting foster children. to accomplish our mission, we focus on finding loving and permanent families for children who the foster care…
Cascades academy is an engaged, vibrant community that weaves challenging academics with experiential learning to inspire socially responsible individuals ready for a diverse and changing world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oregon Coast Community Action and the most unlike its peers is Eugene Debbs Potts Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
247 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 247 of the 283 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING ↗
- Who funds United Way of the Columbia-Willamette ↗
- Who funds Home Share Oregon ↗
- Who funds Civics Learning Project ↗
- Who funds URBAN GLEANERS ↗
- Who funds RETURNING VETERANS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ASSIST ↗
- Who funds Childrens Center ↗
- Who funds LIBERTY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds RANDALL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC OF THE CASCADES ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN- CENTRAL OREGON ↗
- Who funds Proud Ground ↗
- Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND ↗
- Who funds LIFE EXPANDING ADVENTURE PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds Nehalem Bay Health Center & Pharmacy ↗
- Who funds ACRES OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds School Garden Project of Lane County ↗
- Who funds CASA FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH PROGRESS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Birch Community Services Inc ↗
- Who funds READING RESULTS ↗
- Who funds FRIENDLY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds FINANCIAL BEGINNINGS WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds Clackamas Service Center ↗
- Who funds FAMILY AND COMMUNITY TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds ANTFARM INC ↗
- Who funds CASCADE POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds UNITY SHELTER ↗
- Who funds Latino Network ↗
- Who funds CASA OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY ↗
- Who funds KINDRED PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds STORE TO DOOR ↗
- Who funds SAFE HAVEN MATERNITY HOME ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Autzen Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Juan Young Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Braemar Charitable Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Jackson Foundation · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Reser Family Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Farmers Market Fund — 100% of income from government
- Vietnam War Memorial Fund — 100% of income from government
- Sunrise Enterprises of Roseburginc — 99% of income from government
- Community Vision Inc — 92% of income from government
- Oregon Coast Community Action — 85% of income from government
- Sexual Assault Resource Center — 81% of income from government
- Edwards Center Inc — 79% of income from government
- Imagine Possibilities Inc — 77% of income from government
- Pearl Buck Center Incorporated — 76% of income from government
- Family and Community Together — 70% of income from government
- Lines for Life — 70% of income from government
- Family Building Blocks Inc — 68% of income from government
- Exceed Enterprises Inc Co Albertina Kerr — 68% of income from government
- Community Action Organization — 67% of income from government
- The Harbor Inc — 66% of income from government
- Access — 65% of income from government
- Todos Juntos Inc — 64% of income from government
- Neighborhood House Inc — 53% of income from government
- Kindred Partners — 42% of income from government
- Unity Shelter — 42% of income from government
- Rogue Valley Mentoring — 42% of income from government
- Nehalem Bay Health Center & Pharmacy — 40% of income from government
- Butte Falls Community School Partnership — 38% of income from government
- Jesuit Volunteer Corps Northwest — 38% of income from government
- Bridge Meadows — 36% of income from government
- Portland YouthBuilders — 35% of income from government
- Clackamas Women's Services — 33% of income from government
- Responder Life — 33% of income from government
- Outside in — 33% of income from government
- Adelante Mujeres — 31% of income from government
- American Military Encouragement Network — 31% of income from government
- Play It Forward — 30% of income from government
- Upward Bound Camp for Persons With Special Ne — 30% of income from government
- Antfarm Inc — 29% of income from government
- Transition Projects Inc — 29% of income from government
- Metropolitan Family Service — 29% of income from government
- Youth Progress Association — 29% of income from government
- Heart of Oregon Corps Inc — 28% of income from government
- Abc House Inc — 25% of income from government
- United Way of the Columbia-Willamette — 25% of income from government
- Liberty House — 23% of income from government
- Ophelia's Place — 22% of income from government
- Stone Soup Pdx — 20% of income from government
- Parrott Creek Child and Family Services — 20% of income from government
- Helping Hands Reentry Outreach Centers — 18% of income from government
- Reach Community Development Inc — 18% of income from government
- Rogue Valley Farm to School — 17% of income from government
- Homeplate Youth Services — 17% of income from government
- Boys and Girls Clubs of Bend Inc — 16% of income from government
- Friends of the Children- Central Oregon — 16% of income from government
- Latino Network — 15% of income from government
- Lane Arts Council — 14% of income from government
- Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
- Rogue Retreat — 12% of income from government
- The Portland Playhouse — 11% of income from government
- Proud Ground — 11% of income from government
- My Voice Music Inc — 11% of income from government
- Central City Concern — 10% of income from government
- Raphael House of Portland — 10% of income from government
- Bradley Angle — 10% of income from government
- Clackamas Service Center — 9% of income from government
- Hollywood Senior Center dba Community for Positive Aging — 9% of income from government
- School Garden Project of Lane County — 9% of income from government
- Lifeworks Nw — 8% of income from government
- Portland Urban Debate League — 8% of income from government
- Impact Nw — 8% of income from government
- The Shadow Project — 8% of income from government
- Oregon East Symphony — 8% of income from government
- Compass House Inc — 7% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Albany — 7% of income from government
- Community Transitional School — 7% of income from government
- Community Outreach Inc — 7% of income from government
- Josephy Center for Arts and Culture — 7% of income from government
- Clackamas Volunteers in Medicine — 7% of income from government
- The Arts Council of Pendleton Inc — 6% of income from government
- Write Around Portland — 6% of income from government
- Age Us — 6% of income from government
- Growing Gardens — 6% of income from government
- Sustainable Northwest — 5% of income from government
- Community and Shelter Assistance Corp — 5% of income from government
- Girls Inc of the Pacific Northwest — 4% of income from government
- Volunteers in Medicine Clinic of the Cascades — 3% of income from government
- Solid Ground Eaatc — 3% of income from government
- Eastern Oregon Regional Arts Council dba Art Center East — 3% of income from government
- Friendly House Inc — 3% of income from government
- Constructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program — 2% of income from government
- St Andrew Legal Clinic — 2% of income from government
- Casa of Central Oregon — 2% of income from government
- Lewis & Clark College — 2% of income from government
- Mt Scott Park Center for Learning — 2% of income from government
- Casa for Children Inc — 2% of income from government
- Chess for Success — 2% of income from government
- The Dougy Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Pacific Youth Choir — 1% of income from government
- Alberta Abbey Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Parenting Now — 1% of income from government
- Youth Music Project — 1% of income from government
- Oregon Public Broadcasting — 1% of income from government
- Young Musicians & Artists Inc — 0% of income from government
- Portland Youth Philharmonic Association — 0% of income from government
- Portland Jazz Festival Incorporated — 0% of income from government
- Phame Academy — 0% of income from government
- Food Roots — 0% of income from government
- Oregon Repertory Singers — 0% of income from government
- Casa of Clackamas County — 0% of income from government
- Oregon Ballet Theatre — 0% of income from government
- Malheur Council On Aging and Community Services — 0% of income from government
- Community Supported Shelters — 0% of income from government
- Childrens Center — 0% of income from government
- Randall Childrens Hospital Foundation — 0% of income from government
- The Northwest Catholic Counseling Center — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.