How much did Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation grant in FY2024?

Community Improvement$2.4MHuman Services$1.9MHousing & Shelter$1.3MInternational$1.1MPhilanthropy$855kEducation$760kEmployment$501kYouth Development$462kArts & Culture$435kOther$4.4M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

covid reliefrelief recoverycovid responseassociate givingwildfire reliefwildfire recoverypack

2021

blackbaud givingpreparingonlinebusiness equitableequitable lendingaccessityhomeaid works

2022

familrapid rehousingneighbopost-secondary successstrengtheningsrtbetter

2023

cba supplementalcreateyourcausestablepositiveeconomic equitytransitioning

2024

yourcausehumanedeliverwondercenter'sfeasibilitytailored

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 316 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k236 grants · $1.3M
$10k–50k71 grants · $1.3M
$50k–250k9 grants · $600k

$6,000

Median grant

States reached

$17M

Total assets

Largest grants

Mary Bridge Childrens Foundation$150,000
FINANCIAL BEGINNINGS$100,000
PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP$50,000
NORTHWEST HOUSING ALTERNATIVES INC$50,000
EAH INC$50,000
ASIA PACIFIC CULTURAL CENTER$50,000
Compass for Affordable Housing$50,000
COLUMBIA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$50,000
HUMANGOOD AFFORDABLE HOUSING$50,000
WEST ENTERPRISE CENTER INC$40,000
YOURCAUSE LLC$39,065
RESILIENCE GUILD$35,000
UPPER DESCHUTES RIVER COALITION$35,000
YOURCAUSE LLC$34,670
POTLATCH FUND$25,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$8.9M · 287 repeat orgs$5.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +84% since the first grant, against +69% for the ones you funded once.

287 repeat relationships — 157 still active in FY2024, 130 since wound down; 134 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

287

381

Total granted

$8.9M

$3.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%

+69%

Still filing today

91%

75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TB
The Blackbaud Giving Fund
2× · 2021–2022 · $533k · revenue +1231%
LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION
2× · 2022–2024 · $506k · revenue +135%
CC
Centro Community Partners
4× · 2020–2023 · $469k · revenue +181%

Funded once

KM
KIVA MICROFUNDSgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue +125%
B
BlackBaud
one grant, 2020 · $246k
RT
REBUILDING TOGETHER SOUTH SOUNDgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $105k · revenue +139%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Cascade Pacific Rc&D Area

To enhance communities through social, economic, educational, and environmental recovery improvements

Community Improvement

Fair Housing Opportunities of Northwest

The fair housing center is a civil rights agency that promotes housing choice, the protection and expansion of fair housing rights and the resolution of landlord tenant disputes through mediation.

Housing & Shelter

Building Changes

Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, focusing on children, youth, and families. through grantmaking, capacity building, research, and advocacy, the organization works across housing, education,…

Health

Skagit Gleaners

Food recovery for low income families over 600 families served

—

Skagit Habitat for Humanity

The organization partners with hard working people in need of affordable housing, by building and renovating houses in an effort to develop permanent, affordable homes for low income families within Skagit County. We also work with…

—

Insight Housing

Ensuring everyone in our community has a home through supportive, equitable and sustainable housing solutions.

Human Services

California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified

Community Health Center of

To provide our diverse community with access to high quality, affordable primary health care

Health

Community Housing Sonoma County

Community Housing Sonoma County creates supportive housing communities for people living with disabling conditions, especially veterans.

Housing & Shelter

Portland Jobs With Justice Education

We are a coalition that connects community and labor.

Employment

House Our Neighbors

House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…

—

North West Housing Partnership

Established in 1990, North West Housing Partnership (NWHP) is a nonprofit agency that promotes public and private partnerships that create and preserve cost-effective quality housing for low to moderate income residents and workers through…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Deschutes County and the most unlike its peers is Power House Theatre Walla Walla. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.7%5/697

the rest of the field

11%

206,159/1,818,868

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

680 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

266

Early backer (in before they grew)

668/680

Grantees still filing

556/680

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$5,809,391Community Improvement$2,389,000Human Services$1,898,500Housing & Shelter$1,260,500International$1,140,500Philanthropy$854,759Education$759,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Collins FoundationOR123.9× affinity123 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Juan Young Trust · Washington Federal Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Onpoint Community Credit Union · Medina Foundation · The Reser Family Foundation · Careoregon Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

19get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: UPPER DESCHUTES RIVER COALITION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +56% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 030557393 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on UPPER DESCHUTES RIVER COALITION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 37% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

680 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation?

More from the funding graph

Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

680 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation?

More from the funding graph