Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
317
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Community Improvement$3.2MHousing & Shelter$2.4MHuman Services$2.1MInternational$1.1MYouth Development$967kPhilanthropy$952kEducation$732kEmployment$580kOther$0
02FY2024 · 317 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k237 grants · $1.3M
  • $10k–50k71 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $600k
$6,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mary Bridge Childrens Foundation$150,000
FINANCIAL BEGINNINGS$100,000
NORTHWEST HOUSING ALTERNATIVES INC$50,000
ASIA PACIFIC CULTURAL CENTER$50,000
Compass for Affordable Housing$50,000
COLUMBIA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$50,000
EAH INC$50,000
PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP$50,000
HUMANGOOD AFFORDABLE HOUSING$50,000
WEST ENTERPRISE CENTER INC$40,000
YOURCAUSE LLC$39,065
UPPER DESCHUTES RIVER COALITION$35,000
RESILIENCE GUILD$35,000
YOURCAUSE LLC$34,670
NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EL CONCILIO CALIFORNIA: $20k → 12%HUMANGOOD AFFORDABLE HOUSING: $50k → 14%YOLO CRISIS NURSEY INC: $6k → 16%NUESTRA ALIANZA DE WILLITS: $6k → 18%HOOD RIVER SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $6k → 10%COMMUNITY CONNECTION OF NORTHEAST OREGON: $6k → 15%YOUTH VILLAGES INC: $6k → 17%CONTINUE MISSION: $6k → 6%FAMILY HOUSING NETWORK OF FORT COLLINS INC: $6k → 11%DENVER INDIAN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $25k → 12%OVERLAKE SERVICE LEAGUE: $6k → 9%CHELAN VALLEY HOPE: $8k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $6k → 11%OKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $6k → 17%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $8k → 10%RIDDLE ROOTS COMMUNITY PROJECTS: $50k → 17%WARREN VILLAGE INC: $10k → 12%MARTIN LUTHER KING JR FAMILY OUTREACH CENTER: $25k → 12%Latino Community Association: $11k → 10%SACRAMENTO CHILDRENS HOME: $8k → 12%Metropolitan Family Service: $133k → 12%ZERO8HUNDRED INC: $8k → 11%Family Development Center: $13k → 17%TACOMA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $50k → 9%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $7k → 8%EPICENTER FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $13k → 17%TACOMA URBAN LEAGUE: $50k → 9%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICE: $15k → 12%SOUTH SOUND OUTREACH SERVICES: $20k → 9%TACOMA URBAN LEAGUE: $7k → 9%TACOMA URBAN LEAGUE: $7k → 9%SOUTHEAST ASIAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $8k → 10%SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $8k → 11%ABILITYFIRST: $25k → 14%Latino Community Foundation: $11k → 10%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SEATTLE-KING: $20k → 9%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SEATTLE-KING: $15k → 9%STEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $50k → 9%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $7k → 9%Sarah Bellums Bakery & Workshop: $20k → 12%DISABILITY RIGHTS WASHINGTON: $20k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $8k → 9%FINANCIAL BEGINNINGS: $100k → 12%HOLLYWOOD SENIOR CENTER: $8k → 12%OREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $20k → 12%OREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $15k → 12%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICE: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MT
MN
NY
MA
OR
NV
CA
UT
CO
VA
AZ
TN
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 15% of Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 53% of the giving stays in OR; read by stated purpose it is 48% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.4% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.4M · 286 repeat orgs$4.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

286 repeat relationships — 157 still active in FY2024, 129 since wound down; 129 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

286
351

Total granted

$8.4M
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+27%

Still filing today

97%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $506k · revenue +25%
  • CC
    Centro Community Partners
    4× · 2020–2023 · $469k · revenue +1%
  • SE
    SEATTLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND BUSINESS IMPACT NW
    4× · 2020–2023 · $454k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • B
    BlackBaud
    one grant, 2020 · $246k
  • RT
    Rebuilding Together South Sound
    one grant, 2023 · $105k · revenue -17%
  • AR
    American Red Cross - Cascades Region
    one grant, 2023 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Building Changes

Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…

Health
2
House Our Neighbors

House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…

—
3
Housing Connector

Housing connector partners with property owners and managers to lower barriers to housing and increase our region's affordable housing capacity.

Housing & Shelter
4
Community Credit Lab

To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.

Human Services
5
Thrive Central Oregon

To connect individuals to the housing and community resources they seek.

Human Services
6
Portland Business Alliance

To ensure economic prosperity in the portland region by providing strong leadership, partnership, and programs that encourage business growth and vitality.

Community Improvement
7
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
8
North West Housing Partnership

Through a fiscally responsible and multi-faceted approach, north west housing partnership nwhp promotes public and private partnerships that create and preserve cost-effective quality diverse housing for low to moderate-income residents…

—
9
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
10
East Cascades Workforce Investment Board

The east cascades workforce investment board supports the talent needs of employers, and maximizes and aligns investments in the career goals of individuals to fuel a thriving economy.

Employment
11
Network Services

Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…

Human Services
12
Collaborative Economic Development

To accelerate inclusive economic prosperity in lane county, oregon

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Living Opportunities Inc and the most unlike its peers is Playa Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Affordable Housing Developm…Affordable Housing Construc…Lgbtq+ Community SupportMilitary Veterans SupportAnimal Rescue and ShelterCancer Support ServicesCommunity Arts CentersJewish Community Organizati…Environmental Conservation …Equine Therapy ProgramsPregnancy Support ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Local History MuseumsFaith-Based Social ServicesElementary Literacy TutoringSchool District FoundationsSchool Parent OrganizationsPublic Library OperationsYmca Youth DevelopmentAddiction Recovery ServicesSenior Support ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Community Food PantriesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Youth Mentoring ProgramsCommunity College Foundatio…Youth Sports ProgramsIndependent K-12 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community FoundationsImmigrant Worker SupportChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Youth Development CentersFood Banks and PantriesUnited Way AffiliatesYouth Development ServicesLocal Food System Organizat…Policy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%37%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%43%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%9%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%8/747
the rest of the field
13%
240,389/1,818,818

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

726 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 726 of the 787 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
177
Early backer (in before they grew)
716/726
Grantees still filing
467/726
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $506,000 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT…Centro Community Partners — $469,000 · Community ImprovementCentro Community PartnersSEATTLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND BUSINESS IMPACT NW — $454,000 · Community ImprovementSEATTLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPM…ALCHEMIST CDC — $127,000 · Community ImprovementALCHEMIST CDCNimiipuu Community Development Fund — $105,000 · Community ImprovementWARM SPRINGS COMMUNITY ACTION TEAM — $85,000 · Community ImprovementCALIFORNIA CAPITAL SMALL BUSINESS FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $84,000 · Community Improvement+18 more — $492,500 · Community Improvement+18 moreYOURCAUSE LLC — $386,402 · OtherYOURCAUSE LLCBlackBaud — $245,989 · OtherBlackBaudMICRO ENTERPRISE SERVICES OF OREGON — $185,000 · OtherMARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $150,000 · Other+83 more — $2,605,500 · Other+83 moreMetropolitan Family Service — $160,500 · Human ServicesMetropolitan …FINANCIAL BEGINNINGS — $115,000 · Human ServicesFINANCIAL BEG…Tacoma Urban League — $75,000 · Human ServicesTacoma Urban …HOMEAID AMERICA INC — $61,500 · Human ServicesTacoma Community House — $56,000 · Human ServicesSTEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER — $55,000 · Human ServicesHUMANGOOD AFFORDABLE HOUSING — $53,000 · Human ServicesRIDDLE ROOTS COMMUNITY PROJECTS — $50,000 · Human Services+28 more — $631,000 · Human Services+28 moreKIVA MICROFUNDS — $1,000,000 · InternationalKIVA MICROF…JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON — $39,500 · International+2 more — $33,500 · InternationalUMPQUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $161,000 · Housing & ShelterUMPQUA COMM…TACOMA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT GROUP — $106,000 · Housing & ShelterTACOMA HOUS…Rebuilding Together South Sound — $105,000 · Housing & ShelterRebuilding …NORTHWEST HOUSING ALTERNATIVES — $71,000 · Housing & ShelterNORTHWEST H…Community Partners For Affordable Housing — $56,000 · Housing & ShelterPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterVancouver Affordable Housing — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterBIENESTAR INC — $47,500 · Housing & ShelterProud Ground — $47,000 · Housing & ShelterAFRICAN COMMUNITY HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT — $41,000 · Housing & ShelterHOMESTEAD COMMUNITY LAND TRUST — $40,000 · Housing & ShelterFARMWORKER HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $37,500 · Housing & Shelter+12 more — $260,500 · Housing & Shelter+12 moreTHE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND — $533,259 · PhilanthropyNEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIPS INC — $47,000 · PhilanthropySEATTLE FOUNDATION — $34,500 · Philanthropy+3 more — $49,500 · PhilanthropyPortland Workforce Alliance — $125,000 · EducationCOMPASS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING — $50,000 · EducationVENTURES — $41,500 · EducationWOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT — $39,500 · EducationNATIONAL VETERANS TRANSITION SERVICES INC — $25,000 · EducationVANCOUVER SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $22,000 · EducationSCHOOLHOUSE SUPPLIES INC — $22,000 · EducationSMART READING — $21,500 · EducationWYAKIN WARRIOR FOUNDATION INC — $20,500 · EducationCALIFORNIA ASIAN PACIFIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION — $19,500 · EducationYOUR MONEY MATTERS — $19,500 · EducationMT SCOTT PARK CENTER FOR LEARNING — $19,000 · EducationSierra College Foundation — $18,500 · EducationDEGREES OF CHANGE — $18,000 · Education+4 more — $65,000 · Education
Community Improvement$2,322,500Other$3,572,891Human Services$1,257,000International$1,073,000Housing & Shelter$1,072,500Philanthropy$664,259Education$526,500

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKIVA MICROFUNDS — $1,000,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND — $533,259 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $506,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCentro Community Partners — $469,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetSEATTLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND BUSINESS IMPACT NW — $454,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetMICRO ENTERPRISE SERVICES OF OREGON — $185,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetUMPQUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $161,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetMetropolitan Family Service — $160,500 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetMARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetALCHEMIST CDC — $127,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetPortland Workforce Alliance — $125,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetFINANCIAL BEGINNINGS — $115,000 over 4y, 8.1% of budgetTACOMA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT GROUP — $106,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetNimiipuu Community Development Fund — $105,000 over 4y, 9.6% of budgetAsia Pacific Cultural Center — $105,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetRebuilding Together South Sound — $105,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetWARM SPRINGS COMMUNITY ACTION TEAM — $85,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA CAPITAL SMALL BUSINESS FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $84,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetSELF ENHANCEMENT INC — $81,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHACIENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $77,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHWEST NATIVE CHAMBER — $77,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetTacoma Urban League — $75,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetNORTHWEST HOUSING ALTERNATIVES — $71,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetWest Enterprise Center Inc — $70,500 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetHOMEAID AMERICA INC — $61,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetSHARE — $59,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBELLWETHER HOUSING — $58,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Partners For Affordable Housing — $56,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTacoma Community House — $56,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSTEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER — $55,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNEWWEST COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC — $55,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetHUMANGOOD AFFORDABLE HOUSING — $53,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL DIVERSITY COALITION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRIDDLE ROOTS COMMUNITY PROJECTS — $50,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetVancouver Affordable Housing — $50,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetCOLUMBIA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCOMPASS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget3CORE Inc — $49,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetBIENESTAR INC — $47,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIPS INC — $47,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetProud Ground — $47,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE — $45,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER — $45,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVENTURES — $41,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetAFRICAN COMMUNITY HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT — $41,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSE WORKS INC — $40,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHOMESTEAD COMMUNITY LAND TRUST — $40,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Collins FoundationMeyer Memorial TrustMarie Lamfrom Charita…Onpoint Community Cre…Washington Federal Fo…Juan Young TrustOCF Joseph E Weston P…The Autzen FoundationThe Reser Family Foun…M J Murdock Charitabl…Medina FoundationThe Robert D and Marc…
The Collins FoundationOR118.8× affinity123 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Onpoint Community Credit Union · Washington Federal Foundation · Juan Young Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · The Reser Family Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Medina Foundation · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Family Development Center — 71% of income from government
  • Community Action Organization — 67% of income from government
  • Hacienda Community Development Corporation — 48% of income from government
  • Se Works Inc — 43% of income from government
  • Community Lendingworks — 43% of income from government
  • Neighborhood Partnerships Inc — 40% of income from government
  • Oregon Human Development Corporation — 40% of income from government
  • Portland YouthBuilders — 35% of income from government
  • Adelante Mujeres — 31% of income from government
  • Rogue Action Center — 29% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Family Service — 29% of income from government
  • Warm Springs Community Action Team — 28% of income from government
  • Project 48 Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Native American Youth and Family Center — 23% of income from government
  • Community Partners for Affordable Housing — 22% of income from government
  • Ophelia's Place — 22% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
  • Portland Housing Center — 19% of income from government
  • African American Alliance for Homeownership — 17% of income from government
  • Self Enhancement Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Xcelerate Women — 13% of income from government
  • Umpqua Community Development Corp — 12% of income from government
  • VertueLab — 12% of income from government
  • Latino Community Association — 11% of income from government
  • Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Rural Development Initiatives Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Proud Ground — 11% of income from government
  • Bradley Angle — 10% of income from government
  • Hollywood Senior Center dba Community for Positive Aging — 9% of income from government
  • Portland Workforce Alliance — 8% of income from government
  • Bienestar Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Albany — 7% of income from government
  • Farmworker Housing Development Corporation — 7% of income from government
  • Girl Scouts of Oregon & Sw Washington Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Free Geek — 5% of income from government
  • Micro Enterprise Services of Oregon — 5% of income from government
  • Community and Shelter Assistance Corp — 5% of income from government
  • Adaptive Riding Institute Dba Horses of Hope Oregon — 5% of income from government
  • The Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization — 4% of income from government
  • Girls Inc of the Pacific Northwest — 4% of income from government
  • Smart Reading — 3% of income from government
  • Mt Scott Park Center for Learning — 2% of income from government
  • Sarah Bellums Bakery & Workshop — 1% of income from government
  • Northwest Housing Alternatives — 1% of income from government
  • Black United Fund of Oregon — 1% of income from government
  • Community Connection of Ne Oregon Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Financial Beginnings — 1% of income from government
  • CRAFT3 — 1% of income from government
  • Centro Cultural of Washington County — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
76report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 787 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home