· Private foundation
Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k16 grants · $76k
- $10k–50k58 grants · $1.2M
- $50k–250k142 grants · $16M
- $250k+73 grants · $73M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DUKE FARMS FOUNDATION | $16,274,102 |
| DORIS DUKE FOUNDATION FOR ISLAMIC ART | $12,624,834 |
| MAP FUND INC | $2,630,000 |
| JACOB'S PILLOW DANCE FESTIVAL INC | $2,500,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY | $1,750,000 |
| FUND FOR PUBLIC HEALTH IN NEW YORK | $1,746,000 |
| HARVARD UNIVERSITY | $1,740,000 |
| NEW ENGLAND FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS | $1,738,700 |
| THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND | $1,209,300 |
| NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY | $1,115,997 |
| CHAMBER MUSIC AMERICA INC | $1,027,160 |
| AMERICAN FORESTS | $1,010,000 |
| OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $1,000,000 |
| SOUTH ARTS | $1,000,000 |
| FIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE | $985,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $33.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
287 repeat relationships — 147 still active in FY2024, 140 since wound down; 59 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9.6M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DFDUKE FARMS FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $73M · revenue +30% · 99% of their budget
- DDDORIS DUKE FOUNDATION FOR ISLAMIC ART5× · 2020–2024 · $44M · revenue +14% · 72% of their budget
- DDDORIS DUKE FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $8.8M · revenue +38% · 73% of their budget
Funded once
Prevention Institutegraduatedone grant, 2021 · $2.0M · revenue +88% · 25% of their budget- RFResearch Foundation of the City University of New Yorkgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $1.2M · revenue +33%
- HAHEALTH ALLIANCE INTERNATIONALone grant, 2020 · $1.2M · revenue -100%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
The american theatre guild is dedicated to providing the experience of live theatre to foster passion, inspire creativity and empower youth within our communities.
See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Groundwork Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Doris Duke Foundation for Islamic Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
519 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 519 of the 583 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DUKE FARMS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DORIS DUKE FOUNDATION FOR ISLAMIC ART ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds DORIS DUKE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
- Who funds JACOB'S PILLOW DANCE FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
- Who funds THE MAP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PERFORMANCE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds American Forests ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CHAMBER MUSIC AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds South Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
- Who funds NDN COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds Child Welfare Innovation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THINK OF US ↗
- Who funds NEWPORT RESTORATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds DANCEUSA ↗
- Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · New England Foundation for the Arts Incorporated · The Shubert Foundation Inc · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · Mid Atlantic Arts Inc · The Ford Foundation · The Fan Fox and Leslie R Samuels Foundation Inc · Jerome Foundation Inc · The Bloomberg Family Foundation Inc · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · Surdna Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc — 69% of income from government
- Newark Public Radio Inc — 51% of income from government
- Child Trends Inc — 50% of income from government
- Bluehub Capital Inc — 32% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Association of Tribal Archives Libraries & Museums — 21% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Social Finance Inc — 12% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- New England Foundation for the Arts Incorporated — 8% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
- Center Stage Associates Inc — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Consensus Building Institute Inc — 4% of income from government
- University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
- The Connecticut Players Foundation Inc D/B/a Long Wharf Theatre — 1% of income from government
- Oregon Public Broadcasting — 1% of income from government
- Jacob's Pillow Dance Festival Inc — 1% of income from government
- Emerson College — 0% of income from government
- Oregon Shakespeare Festival Association Inc — 0% of income from government
- National Indian Child Welfare Association — 0% of income from government
- Anthropocene Alliance — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.