Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp

CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp (California) receives grants from 88 organizations whose IRS filings report $9,737,405 to it, the largest being The David and Lucile Packard Foundation ($1,173,400). 63 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$4.0M
Funders on record
88
Grants received
$9.7M
Net assets
$3.8M
63/88 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 75%
01What it does

What CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp does

Mission

Our vision is of a just, healthy, and sustainable future for all life on Earth, supported by an effective philanthropic sector.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Biodiversity Funders Group (BFG core)The core focus of BFG is to concentrate on works related to facilitation and relationship building advancing biodiversity conservation on a variety of fronts promoting the global sustainability of terrestrial (Land and Freshwater Program - LFWP) and marine (Marine Conservation Program) ecosystems, while seeking to mitigate the effects of climate change, toxic materials, invasive species, untrammeled development, and other threats to fragile ecosystems worldwide (Global Conservation program). BFG hosted dozens of webinars and other convenings.

    $1,489,080 spent$191,743 earned by the program
    60% of program spending
  2. CLIMATE AND ENERGY FUNDERS GROUP (CEFG)CEFG is a network of foundations that support organizations working on climate and clean energy issues. its mission is to create a strong and effective funding community committed to combating climate change and building a just, global clean energy economy. The CEFG supports working groups on Midwest climate and clean energy funding. these groups meet through calls and in person (when safe to do so). a monthly news digest highlights subjects of interest to funders. an active program of webinars keeps funders current on issues.

    $614,839 spent$68,580 earned by the program
    25% of program spending
  3. MEXICO CONSERVATION FUNDERS (MCF)MCF fosters a funding community committed to the conservation and resilience of ecosystems in Mexico, with a focus on coastal-marine biodiversity and natural systems, recognizing the critical linkages between land and sea, and the potential synergies among national and local level initiatives.

    $205,257 spent$16,050 earned by the program
    8% of program spending
  4. FUNDERS OF THE AMAZON BASIN (FAB)FAB is a learning group comprised of private, grantmaking foundations that share strategies and lessons learned in order to become more effective grantmakers in the Andes-Amazon region.

    $134,233 spent$200 earned by the program
    5% of program spending
  5. CHILE CONSERVATION FUNDERS (CCF)CCF promotes and facilitates coordinated, strategic grant making among funders who support conservation work in Chile through their grant making.

    $44,036 spent
    2% of program spending

The 5 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,487,445.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.9M) Expenses 100 ($1.7M) Net assets 100 ($2.3M)2018 Revenue 84 ($1.6M) Expenses 95 ($1.6M) Net assets 100 ($2.3M)2019 Revenue 97 ($1.8M) Expenses 109 ($1.8M) Net assets 101 ($2.3M)2020 Revenue 104 ($1.9M) Expenses 94 ($1.6M) Net assets 121 ($2.8M)2021 Revenue 88 ($1.6M) Expenses 95 ($1.6M) Net assets 124 ($2.8M)2022 Revenue 113 ($2.1M) Expenses 127 ($2.1M) Net assets 125 ($2.8M)2023 Revenue 136 ($2.5M) Expenses 156 ($2.6M) Net assets 123 ($2.8M)2024 Revenue 215 ($4.0M) Expenses 183 ($3.0M) Net assets 167 ($3.8M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (215)Expenses (183)Net assets (167)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $3.1M to $4.2M (+34%).

$2.4M
$2.4M
$2.5M
$3.0M
$3.0M
$3.0M
$3.1M
$4.2M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 1% · 2018 1% · 2019 1% · 2020 1% · 2021 1% · 2022 1% · 2023 1% · 2024 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

93% of CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (67% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 498 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$215k
’17
−$3k
’18
$20k
’19
$381k
’20
$63k
’21
$20k
’22
−$29k
’23
$988k
’24
13
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Judy Hatcher

Exec Director

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1516151716171923
Joined·+2+1+3+5+3+3+6
No longer listed·1216212
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 20 funders to 48 funders, grant income rose $502k → $1.1M.

8 of 88 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 5% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 88 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 12% of grant income, and it takes 7 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 7 funders to its left

12%
largest funder
29%
top three
~20
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 17% · 2018 21% · 2019 14% · 2020 14% · 2021 27% · 2022 16% · 2023 18% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

54% of CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 72% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp draws 53% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 24 states in all.

VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
WY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
AR
NC
DC
GA
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $450k arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 482 science & tech nonprofits its size.

Operating margin25% · top quartile
Months of reserve13.3mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)12% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 482 science & tech nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Government funding CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $91k on record.

Federal$91k
grants $0contracts $91k
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Top agencies
  • Agency for International Development$91k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

82% of spending goes to programs.

Program 82%Management 14%Fundraising 4%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

71%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 9 states

ME
WA
IL
WI
NY
CT
CA
DE
TN

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp?
CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp (California) receives grants from 88 organizations whose IRS filings report $9,737,405 to it, the largest being The David and Lucile Packard Foundation ($1,173,400). 63 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp have?
IRS filings report 88 organizations giving $9,737,405 in grants to CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp, 63 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp?
The David and Lucile Packard Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $1,173,400 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 88 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing