Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Anna-Maria and Stephen Kellen Foundation Inc C/O Joel E Sammet & Co LLP

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25M
Granted FY2025still arriving
128
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$2.3M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0164% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$118MArts & Culture$90MEducation$68MInternational$14MAnimals$12MEnvironment$11MCommunity Improvement$9.8MHuman Services$8.7MPhilanthropy$4.8MOther$211M
02FY2025 · 128 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k40 grants · $959k
  • $50k–250k54 grants · $6.2M
  • $250k+24 grants · $18M
$75,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$88M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN ACADEMY IN BERLIN$2,251,913
WINNAKEE LAND TRUST$2,000,000
COLUMBIA BUSINESS SCHOOL$1,750,000
RAS AI FOUNDATION$1,500,000
MELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION$1,000,000
NUVANCE HEALTH$1,000,000
THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$1,000,000
Individual grant recipient$815,000
FIDELITY CHARITABLE FUND$598,633
THIRD STREET MUSIC SCHOOL SETTLEMENT$580,000
BARD COLLEGE$550,000
CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE$550,000
ACT OF CONNECTICUT INC$500,000
EAST HILL SYNAGOGUE CHESSED FUND$500,000
GUGGENHEIM MUSEUM$425,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $8.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%BED-STUY CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $50k → 20%CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $50k → 16%CITY RELIEF: $75k → 10%CITY RELIEF: $75k → 10%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $300k → 9%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $150k → 9%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $150k → 9%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $150k → 9%COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE: $30k → 20%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $150k → 9%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $150k → 9%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $100k → 9%RESOURCE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $50k → 28%HOUR CHILDREN: $50k → 13%FILLING IN THE BLANKS: $45k → 9%CRIME VICTIMS TREATMENT CENTER: $150k → 17%CRIME VICTIMS TREATMENT CENTER: $75k → 17%CRIME VICTIMS TREATMENT CENTER INC: $50k → 17%PROSPECTS OPPORTUNITY & ENRICHMENT: $500k → 9%PROSPECTS OPPORTUNITY & ENRICHMENT: $500k → 9%PROSPECTS OPPORTUNITY & ENRICHMENT: $500k → 9%PROSPECTS OPPORTUNITY & ENRICHMENT: $500k → 9%PROSPECTS OPPORTUNITY & ENRICHMENT: $500k → 9%COVENANT HOUSE: $50k → 17%BROADWAY FOR ARTS EDUCATION: $55k → 17%BROADWAY FOR ARTS EDUCATION: $55k → 17%BROADWAY FOR ARTS EDUCATION: $55k → 17%BROADWAY FOR ARTS EDUCATION: $50k → 17%YOUTH JUSTICE NETWORK: $50k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE: $200k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE: $200k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE: $200k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE: $150k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE: $100k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE: $50k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED: $377k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED: $300k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED: $250k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED: $225k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED: $200k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $100k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED: $200k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $100k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $100k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $100k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $100k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $60k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 15% of Anna-Maria and Stephen Kellen Foundation Inc C/O Joel E Sammet & Co LLP’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Anna-Maria and Stephen Kellen Foundation Inc C/O Joel E Sammet & Co LLPlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.3% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$449M · 274 repeat orgs$9.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

274 repeat relationships — 103 still active in FY2025, 171 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

274
130

Total granted

$449M
$6.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+12%

Still filing today

72%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    9× · 2017–2025 · $38M · revenue +58%
  • TR
    THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $28M · revenue +33%
  • CR
    CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $27M · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • PF
    Polo For Life Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $330k · revenue -29% · 31% of their budget
  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $300k · revenue +47%
  • V(
    VAUX-LE-VICOMTE (KING BAUDOUIN FND)
    one grant, 2023 · $275k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
4
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

—
5
New York Studio School

The new york studio school is committed to giving a significant education to the aspiring artist, a preamble to a lifetime's engagement in drawing, painting, and sculpture. (see schedule o for continuation)

—
6
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
New Museum of Contemporary Art

A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.

Arts & Culture
9
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
12
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partnership With Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Eton College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Local History MuseumsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Cancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Domestic Violence ServicesYouth Development ServicesFood Banks and PantriesCommunity Arts CentersImmigrant Worker SupportYouth Development CentersVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Pregnancy Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsAffordable Housing Developm…Lgbtq+ Community SupportYouth Mentoring ProgramsPolicy Research and AdvocacyAddiction Recovery ServicesSenior Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Women & Girls Leadership De…Elementary Literacy TutoringJewish Community Organizati…Animal Rescue and ShelterDance Arts OrganizationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%1%<5yr14%5%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr19%22%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr19%17%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%61%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.3% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.3%1/319
the rest of the field
10%
11,857/120,441

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

311 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 311 of the 432 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

20
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
57
Early backer (in before they grew)
305/311
Grantees still filing
217/311
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY — $52,141,038 · OtherHOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERYWEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER — $43,955,000 · OtherWEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTERAMERICAN ACADEMY IN BERLIN — $21,938,814 · OtherAMERICAN ACADEMY IN BERLINThe Carnegie Hall Society Inc — $11,286,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $9,361,600 · OtherThe Frick Collection — $8,885,000 · OtherFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $7,698,633 · Other+94 more — $73,004,471 · Other+94 moreMAYO CLINIC — $70,457,618 · HealthMAYO CLINICCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $27,290,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUT…MELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION — $6,360,000 · HealthMELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIAN…The Danbury Hospital — $5,543,400 · Health+10 more — $7,875,203 · Health+10 moreMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $38,496,259 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEU…American Museum of Natural History — $6,984,500 · Arts & CultureAmerican Museum of…SOCIETY OF THE THIRD STREET MUSIC SCHOOL SETTLEMENT — $5,730,000 · Arts & CultureSOCIETY OF THE THI…CURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC — $5,000,000 · Arts & CultureCURTIS INSTITUTE O…ART21 INC — $3,700,000 · Arts & CultureACT OF CONNECTICUT — $3,327,285 · Arts & Culture+34 more — $24,474,244 · Arts & Culture+34 moreTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $28,088,750 · EducationTHE ROCKEFELLE…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $9,427,900 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES O…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $5,245,780 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL O…BARD COLLEGE — $2,580,000 · Education+24 more — $22,074,750 · Education+24 moreREACHING U A FOUNDATION FOR URUGUAY — $5,187,640 · InternationalCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC — $4,250,000 · InternationalTHE URBAN ASSEMBLY INC — $1,849,500 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $1,650,000 · InternationalAMERICAN COUNCIL ON GERMANY INC — $540,000 · International+3 more — $725,000 · InternationalTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER — $10,544,000 · AnimalsWOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $810,000 · Animals+3 more — $577,500 · AnimalsWINNAKEE LAND TRUST INC — $8,500,000 · EnvironmentScenic Hudson Inc — $1,600,000 · Environment+2 more — $480,000 · Environment
Other$228,270,556Health$117,526,221Arts & Culture$87,712,288Education$67,417,180International$14,202,140Animals$11,931,500Environment$10,580,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC — $70,457,618 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $38,496,259 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $28,088,750 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $27,290,000 over 9y, 20% of budgetThe Carnegie Hall Society Inc — $11,286,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER — $10,544,000 over 7y, 6.7% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $9,427,900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Frick Collection — $8,885,000 over 9y, 7.1% of budgetWINNAKEE LAND TRUST INC — $8,500,000 over 6y, 73% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $7,698,633 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History — $6,984,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetMELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION — $6,360,000 over 9y, 12% of budgetSOCIETY OF THE THIRD STREET MUSIC SCHOOL SETTLEMENT — $5,730,000 over 9y, 15% of budgetThe Danbury Hospital — $5,543,400 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $5,245,780 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetREACHING U A FOUNDATION FOR URUGUAY — $5,187,640 over 6y, 23% of budgetCURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC — $5,000,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC — $4,250,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetART21 INC — $3,700,000 over 9y, 29% of budgetVassar Brothers Medical Center — $3,675,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetACT OF CONNECTICUT — $3,327,285 over 9y, 34% of budgetNational Gallery of Art — $2,810,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetBARD COLLEGE — $2,580,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetSKOWHEGAN SCHOOL OF PAINTING AND SCULPTURE INC — $2,580,000 over 6y, 28% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $2,544,150 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetMetropolitan Opera Association Inc — $2,535,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPROSPECTS OPPORTUNITY AND ENRICHMENT INC — $2,500,000 over 5y, 24% of budgetNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC — $2,500,000 over 6y, 6.8% of budgetFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC — $2,391,000 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION — $2,250,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetThe Pierpont Morgan Library — $2,150,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $1,915,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE URBAN ASSEMBLY INC — $1,849,500 over 8y, 5.7% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $1,825,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetBROOKS SCHOOL — $1,700,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES — $1,700,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetWOMEN'S PRISON ASSOCIATION AND HOME — $1,675,000 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetRIDGEFIELD ACADEMY INC — $1,662,500 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $1,650,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetScenic Hudson Inc — $1,600,000 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC — $1,587,050 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNEW VISIONS FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC — $1,550,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetHARLEM SCHOOL OF THE ARTS INC — $1,490,682 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetTHE BREARLEY SCHOOL — $1,420,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetMULTIPLYING GOOD INC — $1,420,000 over 7y, 6.9% of budgetTHE SCULPTURE CENTER INC — $1,410,000 over 7y, 16% of budgetSILVER HILL HOSPITAL INC — $1,350,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCIVIC NEWS COMPANY — $1,300,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Carnegie Hall Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds The Frick Collection ↗
  • Who funds WINNAKEE LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗
  • Who funds MELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF THE THIRD STREET MUSIC SCHOOL SETTLEMENT ↗
  • Who funds The Danbury Hospital ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds REACHING U A FOUNDATION FOR URUGUAY ↗
  • Who funds CURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds ART21 INC ↗
  • Who funds Vassar Brothers Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds ACT OF CONNECTICUT ↗
  • Who funds National Gallery of Art ↗
  • Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SKOWHEGAN SCHOOL OF PAINTING AND SCULPTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Metropolitan Opera Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROSPECTS OPPORTUNITY AND ENRICHMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Pierpont Morgan Library ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hyde and Watson F…The New York Communit…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Robin Hood FoundationThe Barker Welfare Fo…Jewish Communal FundPinkerton FoundationAg FoundationArnhold Foundation IncThe Ford FoundationLily Auchincloss Foun…Charina Foundation In…
The Hyde and Watson FoundationNJ58.6× affinity36 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Robin Hood Foundation · The Barker Welfare Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Pinkerton Foundation · Ag Foundation · Arnhold Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Charina Foundation Inc Richard Menschel

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Anna-Maria and Stephen Kellen Foundation Inc C/O Joel E Sammet & Co LLP funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 190%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Aha Foundation Inc — 42% of income from government
  • The Aldrich Contemporary Art Museum Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Baltimore Museum of Art — 4% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
  • Western Connecticut Youth Orchestra Inc — 3% of income from government
  • The Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Rvnahealth Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Danbury Music Centre — 1% of income from government
  • Act of Connecticut — 1% of income from government
  • Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
  • The Ridgefield Playhouse for Movies and the Performing Arts Inc — 1% of income from government
  • The Danbury Hospital — 1% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Silver Hill Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
19get no government money at all
61report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Anna-Maria and Stephen Kellen Foundation Inc C/O Joel E Sammet & Co LLP?

Find your warmest path to Anna-Maria and Stephen Kellen Foundation Inc C/O Joel E Sammet & Co LLP through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 432 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines