· Private foundation
Arnhold Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k88 grants · $322k
- $10k–50k90 grants · $1.9M
- $50k–250k27 grants · $3.1M
- $250k+28 grants · $52M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| 92ND ST Y | $13,008,331 |
| CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL | $3,997,900 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE | $3,975,000 |
| UC REGENTS | $3,719,713 |
| NIA TERO FOUNDATION | $3,500,000 |
| JUILLIARD SCHOOL | $3,375,800 |
| JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER | $2,696,750 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500,000 |
| WNET THIRTEEN | $1,800,000 |
| ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI | $1,602,324 |
| WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART | $1,519,250 |
| TEACHERS COLLEGE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY | $1,283,685 |
| LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS | $1,250,000 |
| CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN | $1,059,000 |
| AFRO LATIN JAZZ ALLIANCE | $950,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $244k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
309 repeat relationships — 197 still active in FY2024, 112 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.9M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $32M · revenue +123%- IRInternational Rescue Committee INC8× · 2017–2024 · $25M · revenue +81%
- NTNIA TERO FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $24M · revenue +93% · 59% of their budget
Funded once
- TMTHE MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTERone grant, 2017 · $2.0M · revenue -52% · 80% of their budget
- MSMT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEMone grant, 2017 · $2.0M
- SOSTATE OF CT- TOWN OF BETHELone grant, 2022 · $660k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
El museo's mission is to preserve, interpret, and promote the artistic heritage of puerto ricans and all latin americans in the united states by means of exhibitions, public programs, publications, and educational activities.
Move|nyc| is a civic arts and social justice organization committed to cultivating a more diverse and inclusive society through transforming the field of professional dance. more than an arts organization, move|nyc| is a movement for…
Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…
Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…
A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.
The new york studio school is committed to giving a significant education to the aspiring artist, a preamble to a lifetime's engagement in drawing, painting, and sculpture. (see schedule o for continuation)
For more than a century, diller-quaile has offered an environment where music can flourish in all its aspects, enriching the lives of students of all ages and cultural backgrounds. the belief that music is a fundamental part of human life…
Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…
Bard college seeks to provide a challenging academic program and a supportive environment that fosters a collaborative interchange of ideas in the classroom as well as ambition to achieve excellence.
Producing and developing plays and musicals.
For over 150 years, the 92nd street y, new york has been serving its communities and the larger world by bringing people together (continued on schedule o)and providing exceptional, groundbreaking programs in the performing and visual…
The new york academy of art is a unique graduate school that combines intensive technical training in the fine arts with active critical discourse. we believe that rigorously trained artists are best able to realize their artistic vision.…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Foundation for the Arts Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Neue Galerie New York. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.3% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
357 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 357 of the 523 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds NIA TERO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Teachers College Columbia University ↗
- Who funds WNET ↗
- Who funds JUILLIARD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds The New School ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
- Who funds THE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL TENNIS HALL OF FAME INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds BALLET HISPANICO OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds UC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SING FOR HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN ↗
- Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
- Who funds VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Frick Collection ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Harkness Foundation for Dance Inc · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Fan Fox and Leslie R Samuels Foundation Inc · The Shubert Foundation Inc · Ag Foundation · Mertz Gilmore Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Mid Atlantic Arts Inc · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · New England Foundation for the Arts Incorporated · Arison Arts Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Arnhold Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Learning Inc — 39% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Northwest Connecticut Land Conservancy Inc — 9% of income from government
- American Academy of Arts & Sciences — 3% of income from government
- Pilobolus Inc — 1% of income from government
- Jacob's Pillow Dance Festival Inc — 1% of income from government
- National Foundation for Advancement in the Arts Inc — 0% of income from government
- Little Britches Therapeutic Riding Inc — 0% of income from government
- National Dance Education Organization — 0% of income from government
- Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Arnhold Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Arnhold Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.