Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Winnick Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$2.2MAnimals$1.1MEducation$950kHuman Services$422kEnvironment$412kReligion$252kHealth$193kPhilanthropy$111kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$21k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILD EARTH ALLIES$7,500
SCBWI IMPACT AND LEGACY FUND$7,500
GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOO ASSOCIATION$2,500
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$2,500
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE$2,000
TEMPLE OF THE ARTS$1,700
MUSIC CENTER$1,000
THE SEEING EYE$250
FOSTER ARMY ANIMAL RESCUE$150
SAM'S HOPE$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $187k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 6%ADOPT-A-NATIVE ELDER PROGRAM: $1k → 8%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $20k → 6%ADOPT-A-NATIVE ELDER PROGRAM: $500 → 8%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 6%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $150 → 9%ADOPT-A-NATIVE ELDER PROGRAM: $250 → 8%ADOPT-A-NATIVE ELDER PROGRAM: $250 → 8%ADOPT-A-NATIVE ELDER PROGRAM: $100 → 8%HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $1k → 14%HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $100 → 14%EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN 'S FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $250 → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO: $10k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO: $10k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO: $2k → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $500 → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $250 → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $250 → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $250 → 17%WESPARK INC: $500 → 14%LOVE ON 4 PAWS INC: $500 → 14%LOVE ON 4 PAWS INC: $250 → 14%LOVE ON 4 PAWS INC: $250 → 14%WESPARK INC: $250 → 14%LOVE ON 4 PAWS INC: $250 → 14%WESPARK INC: $250 → 14%LOVE ON 4 PAWS INC: $250 → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES LOS ANGELES: $1k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $1k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $1k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%THE LANGE FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%THE LANGE FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%THE LANGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%THE LANGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%THE LANGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%THE LANGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%THE LANGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.6M · 133 repeat orgs$258k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

133 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 126 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

133
117

Total granted

$5.6M
$255k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+30%

Still filing today

78%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GL
    GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $440k · revenue +3%
  • BS
    BRENTWOOD SCHOOL
    5× · 2017–2021 · $325k · revenue +42%
  • WE
    Wild Earth Allies Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $261k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • AI
    AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -27%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ELNETgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +47%
  • JF
    JERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
3
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
4
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
5
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
6
Pet Orphans of Southern California

In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.

Animals
7
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
8
United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…

9
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
10
Los Angeles Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Spcala is dedicated to the prevention of cruelty to animals through education, law enforcement, intervention and advocacy.

Animals
11
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
12
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Seeing Eye Inc and the most unlike its peers is Runaways Animal Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsAnimal Rescue and ShelterEnvironmental Conservation …Jewish Community Organizati…Pregnancy Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Volunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Elementary Literacy TutoringCancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Equine Therapy ProgramsDevelopmental Disabilities …Community Arts CentersIndependent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%34%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%9%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%67%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/201
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,364

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

195 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 195 of the 255 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
53
Early backer (in before they grew)
190/195
Grantees still filing
150/195
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Museum of Modern Art — $1,614,280 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern ArtSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER — $150,000 · Arts & CultureSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTERPS 1 CONTEMPORARY ART CENTER INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC — $85,000 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $75,700 · Arts & Culture+11 more — $167,750 · Arts & Culture+11 moreGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $440,475 · AnimalsGREATER LOS ANGELES…Defenders of Wildlife — $152,880 · AnimalsDefenders of Wildli…BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $142,500 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL…NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC — $38,350 · AnimalsAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC — $35,500 · Animals+40 more — $181,900 · Animals+40 moreTHE JEWISH FEDERATION — $250,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONJERUSALEM FOUNDATION — $100,000 · OtherJERUSALEM FOUNDATIONCHABAD — $91,800 · OtherCHABADBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL — $75,000 · OtherBIRTHRIGHT ISRAELBABY2BABY — $75,000 · OtherBABY2BABYNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $60,000 · OtherTHE GREATEST GENERATIONS FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · OtherTHE TORAH AND NATURE FOUNDATION — $50,600 · Other+82 more — $405,665 · Other+82 moreTHE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION — $480,000 · EducationTHE CENTER FOR EA…BRENTWOOD SCHOOL — $325,000 · EducationBRENTWOOD SCHOOLSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $40,000 · Education+11 more — $50,150 · Education+11 moreWild Earth Allies Inc — $261,000 · EnvironmentTREEPEOPLE INC — $27,500 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $25,000 · Environment+1 more — $4,000 · EnvironmentISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $80,000 · Human ServicesLANGE FOUNDATION — $70,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC — $21,800 · Human Services+11 more — $19,200 · Human ServicesST MARYS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM FOR CHILDREN INC — $25,000 · HealthNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION — $20,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC — $17,500 · HealthTOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC — $9,000 · HealthScleroderma Research Foundation — $5,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $5,000 · HealthELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 · HealthAHEAD WITH HORSES INC — $4,000 · Health+8 more — $12,250 · Health
Arts & Culture$2,192,730Animals$991,605Other$1,208,065Education$895,150Environment$317,500Human Services$191,000Health$102,250

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMuseum of Modern Art — $1,614,280 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION — $480,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $440,475 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetBRENTWOOD SCHOOL — $325,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWild Earth Allies Inc — $261,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife — $152,880 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER — $150,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $142,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPS 1 CONTEMPORARY ART CENTER INC — $100,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC — $85,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $80,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $75,700 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBABY2BABY — $75,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLANGE FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TORAH AND NATURE FOUNDATION — $50,600 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetTHE GREATEST GENERATIONS FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC — $38,350 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC — $35,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTREEPEOPLE INC — $27,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ELNET — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC — $21,800 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM — $21,650 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD ANIMAL PROTECTION — $21,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWILD CANID SURVIVAL AND RESEARCH CENTER INC DBA ENDANGERED WOLF CENTER — $20,750 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION — $20,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA — $20,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society — $20,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC — $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC — $16,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $12,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHIMP HAVEN INC — $11,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra — $10,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREAD TO A CHILD INC — $10,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES — $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC — $9,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES — $8,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION
  • Who funds GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds BRENTWOOD SCHOOL
  • Who funds Wild Earth Allies Inc
  • Who funds Defenders of Wildlife
  • Who funds SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds PS 1 CONTEMPORARY ART CENTER INC
  • Who funds ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds BABY2BABY
  • Who funds LANGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE TORAH AND NATURE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE GREATEST GENERATIONS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC
  • Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC
  • Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MUSEUM ASSOCIATES
  • Who funds TREEPEOPLE INC
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ELNET
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM
  • Who funds WORLD ANIMAL PROTECTION
  • Who funds WILD CANID SURVIVAL AND RESEARCH CENTER INC DBA ENDANGERED WOLF CENTER
  • Who funds AQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide FoundationCA43.8× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · California Community Foundation · Mary Jo and Hank Greenberg Animal Welfare Foundation · The Stanley & Joyce Black Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Ahmanson Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Winnick Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 110%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Reach Out and Read Inc9% of income from government
  • Giraffe Conservation Foundation Usa2% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc2% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Winnick Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Winnick Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 255 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph