Skip to content
The Winnick Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Winnick Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$2.2MAnimals$1.1MEducation$950kHuman Services$422kEnvironment$412kReligion$252kHealth$193kPhilanthropy$111kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$137
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELEPHANT FAMILY USA INC$9,646
SCBWI IMPACT AND LEGACY FUND$5,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$2,500
WILD EARTH ALLIES$2,500
GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOO ASSOCIATION$1,500
THE SEEING EYE$250
SAM'S HOPE$150
PAW WARRIORS INC$150
LOS ANGELES COUNTY POLICE CANINE ASSOCIATION$100
THE RUNAWAYS ANIMAL RESCUE$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $187k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 6%ADOPT-A-NATIVE ELDER PROGRAM: $1k → 8%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $20k → 6%ADOPT-A-NATIVE ELDER PROGRAM: $500 → 8%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 6%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $150 → 9%ADOPT-A-NATIVE ELDER PROGRAM: $250 → 8%ADOPT-A-NATIVE ELDER PROGRAM: $250 → 8%ADOPT-A-NATIVE ELDER PROGRAM: $100 → 8%HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $1k → 14%HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $100 → 14%EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN 'S FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $250 → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO: $10k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO: $10k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO: $2k → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $500 → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $250 → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $250 → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $250 → 17%WESPARK INC: $500 → 14%LOVE ON 4 PAWS INC: $500 → 14%LOVE ON 4 PAWS INC: $250 → 14%LOVE ON 4 PAWS INC: $250 → 14%WESPARK INC: $250 → 14%LOVE ON 4 PAWS INC: $250 → 14%WESPARK INC: $250 → 14%LOVE ON 4 PAWS INC: $250 → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $1k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES LOS ANGELES: $1k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $1k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%THE LANGE FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%THE LANGE FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%THE LANGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%THE LANGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%THE LANGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%THE LANGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%THE LANGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.6M · 135 repeat orgs$265k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

135 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 126 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

135
118

Total granted

$5.6M
$255k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+27%

Still filing today

77%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GL
    GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $442k · revenue +3%
  • BS
    BRENTWOOD SCHOOL
    5× · 2017–2021 · $325k · revenue +42%
  • WE
    Wild Earth Allies Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $264k · revenue +129%

Funded once

  • AI
    AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -24%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ELNETgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +47%
  • JF
    JERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
Conservation Society of California

Through management of oakland zoo, the conservation society of california deepens connection with animals, saves wildlife, and inspires champions for the natural world.

Animals
3
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
4
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
5
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
6
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
7
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
8
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals
9
Los Angeles Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Spcala is dedicated to the prevention of cruelty to animals through education, law enforcement, intervention and advocacy.

Animals
10
Pet Orphans of Southern California

In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.

Animals
11
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
12
United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Seeing Eye Inc; the most unlike its peers is Runaways Animal Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

196 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 196 of the 256 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
54
Early backer (in before they grew)
191/196
Grantees still filing
151/196
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Museum of Modern Art: $1,614,280 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern ArtSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $150,000 · Arts & CultureSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTERPS 1 CONTEMPORARY ART CENTER INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $85,000 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $75,700 · Arts & Culture+11 more: $167,750 · Arts & Culture+11 moreGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $441,975 · AnimalsGREATER LOS ANGELES…Defenders of Wildlife: $152,880 · AnimalsDefenders of Wildli…BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $142,500 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL…NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $38,350 · AnimalsAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $35,500 · Animals+40 more: $191,196 · Animals+40 moreTHE JEWISH FEDERATION: $250,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONJERUSALEM FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherJERUSALEM FOUNDATIONCHABAD: $91,800 · OtherCHABADBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL: $75,000 · OtherBIRTHRIGHT ISRAELBABY2BABY: $75,000 · OtherBABY2BABYNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherTHE GREATEST GENERATIONS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · OtherTHE TORAH AND NATURE FOUNDATION: $50,600 · Other+83 more: $413,765 · Other+83 moreTHE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION: $480,000 · EducationTHE CENTER FOR EA…BRENTWOOD SCHOOL: $325,000 · EducationBRENTWOOD SCHOOLSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $40,000 · Education+11 more: $50,150 · Education+11 moreWild Earth Allies Inc: $263,500 · EnvironmentTREEPEOPLE INC: $27,500 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $25,000 · Environment+1 more: $4,000 · EnvironmentISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $80,000 · Human ServicesLANGE FOUNDATION: $70,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC: $21,800 · Human Services+11 more: $19,450 · Human ServicesST MARYS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM FOR CHILDREN INC: $25,000 · HealthNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC: $17,500 · HealthTOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $9,000 · HealthScleroderma Research Foundation: $5,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 · HealthELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 · HealthAHEAD WITH HORSES INC: $4,000 · Health+7 more: $11,750 · Health
Arts & Culture$2,192,730Animals$1,002,401Other$1,216,165Education$895,150Environment$320,000Human Services$191,250Health$101,750

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $1,614,280 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION: $480,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $441,975 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetBRENTWOOD SCHOOL: $325,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWild Earth Allies Inc: $263,500 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $152,880 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $150,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $142,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPS 1 CONTEMPORARY ART CENTER INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $85,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $80,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $75,700 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBABY2BABY: $75,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLANGE FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TORAH AND NATURE FOUNDATION: $50,600 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GREATEST GENERATIONS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $38,350 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $35,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTREEPEOPLE INC: $27,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ELNET: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC: $21,800 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM: $21,650 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD ANIMAL PROTECTION: $21,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWILD CANID SURVIVAL AND RESEARCH CENTER INC DBA ENDANGERED WOLF CENTER: $20,750 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION: $20,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $20,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $20,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $16,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $12,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHIMP HAVEN INC: $11,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra: $10,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREAD TO A CHILD INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $9,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES: $8,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BRENTWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Wild Earth Allies Inc ↗
  • Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
  • Who funds SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PS 1 CONTEMPORARY ART CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BABY2BABY ↗
  • Who funds LANGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TORAH AND NATURE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GREATEST GENERATIONS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds TREEPEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ELNET ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds WORLD ANIMAL PROTECTION ↗
  • Who funds WILD CANID SURVIVAL AND RESEARCH CENTER INC DBA ENDANGERED WOLF CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thornton S Jr and Kat…The Annenberg Foundat…California Community …Mary Jo and Hank Gree…The Stanley & Joyce B…Jewish Community Foun…The Ahmanson Foundati…Conrad N Hilton Found…The Ralph M Parsons F…The American Society …PC Fund for Animals C…The Duffield Family F…
Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide FoundationCA43.8× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · California Community Foundation · Mary Jo and Hank Greenberg Animal Welfare Foundation · The Stanley & Joyce Black Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Ahmanson Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Winnick Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Winnick Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Giraffe Conservation Foundation Usa: 2% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Winnick Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Winnick Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 256 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Winnick Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home