Loading…
Loading…
Colorado · Nonprofit
The Bob Telmosse Foundation (Colorado) is funded by 5 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $30,491 in grants to it, the largest being T ROWE PRICE FOUNDATION INC ($25,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
The Bob Telmosse Foundation has grown faster than three-quarters of the 13,069 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,069 human services nonprofits under $100k, FY2021
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
$1k from 1 funders in 2025, up from $5k and 2 in 2020.
1 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 1% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of The Bob Telmosse Foundation’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 4 of 5 funders by total. Association, not causation.
The Bob Telmosse Foundation leans on a few funders — its largest provides 82% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 99% · 2021 97% · 2022 69% · 2023 83% · 2024 83% · 2025 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
The Bob Telmosse Foundation draws 84% of its grant income from funders outside Colorado — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 4 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 5 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2021 (financials across 2018–2021), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing