Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Annie E Casey Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$93M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1,462
Grants FY2024still arriving
51
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$69MCrime & Legal$68MPhilanthropy$50MHuman Services$48MPublic Benefit$47MCivil Rights$46MYouth Development$42MCommunity Improvement$42MOther$0
02FY2024 · 1462 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k426 grants · $995k
  • $10k–50k333 grants · $8.1M
  • $50k–250k638 grants · $59M
  • $250k+65 grants · $25M
$40,000
Median grant
51
States reached
$2.3B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
New America Foundation$1,185,000
Cetera Inc$1,077,650
Child Trends Inc$725,000
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities$700,000
The Institute for College Access and Success$690,000
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill$575,000
National Fund for Workforce Solutions Inc$550,000
Georgetown University$550,000
REDF$548,000
Inside Circle$535,000
Arizona Community Foundation Inc$508,400
SouthWest Organizing Project$500,000
Race Forward$500,000
Kindred Futures$500,000
Credible Messenger Mentoring Movement$500,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $46.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE: $525k → 10%INSIDE CIRCLE: $560k → 8%Inside Circle: $535k → 12%LA PLAZITA INSTITUTE: $600k → 14%Plummer Youth Promise: $325k → 10%INSIDE-OUTSIDE CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $525k → 8%LA PLAZITA INSTITUTE: $540k → 14%Urban Strategies Inc: $275k → 21%Child Welfare Innovation Inc: $270k → 16%INSIDE-OUTSIDE CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $400k → 8%LA PLAZITA INSTITUTE: $500k → 14%Child Trends Inc: $1.1M → 8%CHRIS 180 INC: $250k → 14%CHILD TRENDS INC: $767k → 8%Living Cities Inc- The National Community Development Initiative: $1.1M → 17%CHILD TRENDS INC: $766k → 8%LIVING CITIES INC THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE: $400k → 17%CHRIS 180 INC: $250k → 14%Child Trends Inc: $725k → 8%LIVING CITIES INC THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE: $400k → 17%CHILD TRENDS INC: $685k → 8%LIVING CITIES INC THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE: $400k → 17%CHILD TRENDS INC: $605k → 8%LIVING CITIES INC THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE: $400k → 17%CHILD TRENDS INC: $449k → 8%Living Cities Inc The National Community Development Initiative: $400k → 17%CHILD TRENDS INC: $308k → 8%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $265k → 10%CHILD TRENDS INC: $295k → 8%CHILD TRENDS INC: $264k → 8%Child Trends Inc: $255k → 8%Possibility Labs: $440k → 10%POSSIBILITY LABS: $250k → 10%THINK OF US: $271k → 17%THINK OF US: $500k → 14%THINK OF US: $447k → 14%Think of Us: $437k → 14%THINK OF US: $375k → 14%THINK OF US: $346k → 14%THINK OF US: $305k → 14%First Focus: $451k → 14%PARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICA'S CHILDREN: $674k → 14%PARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICA'S CHILDREN: $598k → 14%PARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICA'S CHILDREN: $535k → 14%PARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICA'S CHILDREN: $350k → 14%Partnership for America's Children: $300k → 14%Center for Children's Law and Policy Inc: $619k → 14%CENTER FOR CHILDRENS LAW AND POLICY INC: $450k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$461M · 1123 repeat orgs$35M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

1123 repeat relationships — 713 still active in FY2024, 410 since wound down; 246 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1123
574

Total granted

$461M
$23M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+18%

Still filing today

85%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE URBAN INSTITUTE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $12M · revenue +2%
  • CT
    CHILD TRENDS INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $10M · revenue +62%
  • FUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $10M · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2019 · $500k
  • TA
    THE ARC OF DELAWARE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $425k · revenue -18% · 95% of their budget
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
    one grant, 2019 · $375k · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
4
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
5
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
6
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
7
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

—
8
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
9
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
10
City Year Inc

City year helps students and schools succeed, while preparing the next generation of civically engaged leaders who can work across lines of difference. partnering with teachers, teams of city year americorps members cultivate learning…

Unclassified
11
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
12
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Education Training and Research Associates and the most unlike its peers is Cetera Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity College Foundatio…Youth Development ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportHealth Access Advocacy and …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Addiction Recovery ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Faith-Based Social ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Youth Sports ProgramsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Ymca Youth DevelopmentElementary Literacy TutoringCommunity Arts CentersPregnancy Support ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesChristian Youth CampsCommunity Food PantriesMilitary Veterans SupportCancer Support ServicesSchool Parent OrganizationsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Local History MuseumsLocal Food System Organizat…Dance Arts OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and ShelterChristian Missionary Organi…School District FoundationsYouth Mentoring ProgramsJewish Community Organizati…Youth Development CentersFood Banks and PantriesIndependent K-12 SchoolsSenior Support ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Lgbtq+ Community SupportCommunity FoundationsUnited Way AffiliatesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%13%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%20%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%25/1,997
the rest of the field
13%
240,371/1,817,568

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

1636 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1636 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

97
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
398
Early backer (in before they grew)
1594/1636
Grantees still filing
1050/1636
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CASE COMMONS INC — $12,650,782 · OtherCASE COMMONS INCNEW AMERICA FOUNDATION — $5,357,400 · OtherW HAYWOOD BURNS INSTITUTE — $4,836,903 · OtherNEW VENTURE FUND — $4,853,400 · Other+86 more — $103,484,058 · Other+86 moreCHILD TRENDS INC — $10,365,471 · Human ServicesCHILD TRENDS INCPARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICAS CHILDREN — $3,958,360 · Human ServicesPARTNERSHIP FOR AMER…CETERA INC — $3,904,005 · Human ServicesCETERA INCTHINK OF US — $3,821,102 · Human ServicesTHINK OF USLIVING CITIES INC THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE — $3,150,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER — $2,491,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR CHILDREN'S LAW AND POLICY — $2,399,000 · Human ServicesINSIDE-OUTSIDE CIRCLE FOUNDATION — $2,330,000 · Human ServicesLA PLAZITA INSTITUTE — $2,125,000 · Human Services+25 more — $25,266,249 · Human Services+25 moreFUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC — $10,042,061 · EducationFUND FOR EDUCA…NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES INSTITUTE INC — $3,972,116 · EducationNATIONAL LEAGU…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $3,907,278 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS …GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $2,693,500 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNI…FUTURE FOCUSED EDUCATION — $2,304,500 · EducationFUTURE FOCUSED…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $2,155,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $2,006,335 · EducationEQUAL MEASURE — $1,617,566 · Education+15 more — $12,597,199 · Education+15 moreBALTIMORE CIVIC FUND INC — $4,846,587 · PhilanthropyBALTIMORE C…StriveTogether Inc — $3,753,334 · PhilanthropyStriveToget…ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,734,400 · PhilanthropyARIZONA COM…THE FORUM FOR YOUTH INVESTMENT — $2,459,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FORUM F…REDF — $2,198,000 · PhilanthropyREDFUNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC — $1,937,207 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY …Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc — $1,845,190 · PhilanthropyAmalgamated…SEATTLE FOUNDATION — $1,355,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY — $1,250,000 · PhilanthropyASSET FUNDERS NETWORK — $1,100,345 · Philanthropy+11 more — $9,420,618 · Philanthropy+11 moreTHE URBAN INSTITUTE — $11,823,182 · Social ScienceTHE URBAN…THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $5,086,632 · Social ScienceTHE ASPEN…Population Reference Bureau Inc — $3,162,254 · Social SciencePopulatio…THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION — $2,059,063 · Social ScienceTHE BROOK…JOINT CENTER FOR POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC STUDIES INC — $1,372,700 · Social ScienceCOMMON JUSTICE INC — $1,002,000 · Social Science+3 more — $2,352,500 · Social Science+3 moreCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities — $5,730,204 · Public BenefitCENTER FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIAL POLICY — $3,534,365 · Public BenefitTHE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE EDUCATION FUND INC — $1,640,000 · Public BenefitMONTANA BUDGET AND POLICY CENTER — $1,462,500 · Public BenefitGEORGIA BUDGET AND POLICY INSTITUTE INC — $1,410,900 · Public BenefitBIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER INC — $925,000 · Public BenefitINSTITUTE ON TAXATION AND ECONOMIC POLICY — $890,000 · Public BenefitEDUCATION NORTHWEST — $857,000 · Public BenefitFLORIDA POLICY INSTITUTE INC — $831,500 · Public BenefitGEORGIA WATCH — $671,048 · Public BenefitALABAMA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE INC — $662,000 · Public BenefitFUSION PARTNERSHIP INC — $2,824,392 · Community ImprovementPOLICYLINK — $2,737,500 · Community ImprovementTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $2,546,275 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL SKILLS COALITION — $2,000,000 · Community ImprovementRACE FORWARD — $1,677,000 · Community ImprovementEAST BALTIMORE DEVELOPMENT INC — $1,155,000 · Community ImprovementKINDRED FUTURES INC — $1,135,800 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE — $975,000 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $773,862 · Community ImprovementTexas Appleseed — $718,100 · Community ImprovementPROSPERITY NOW — $690,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY ORGANIZING AND FAMILY ISSUES — $658,500 · Community Improvement
Other$131,182,543Human Services$59,810,187Education$41,295,555Philanthropy$32,899,681Social Science$26,858,331Public Benefit$18,614,517Community Improvement$17,891,429

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCASE COMMONS INC — $12,650,782 over 4y, 98% of budgetTHE URBAN INSTITUTE — $11,823,182 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetCHILD TRENDS INC — $10,365,471 over 6y, 8.3% of budgetFUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC — $10,042,061 over 6y, 9.0% of budgetCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities — $5,730,204 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetNEW AMERICA FOUNDATION — $5,357,400 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $5,086,632 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $4,853,400 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBALTIMORE CIVIC FUND INC — $4,846,587 over 6y, 19% of budgetW HAYWOOD BURNS INSTITUTE — $4,836,903 over 6y, 26% of budgetNATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES INSTITUTE INC — $3,972,116 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICAS CHILDREN — $3,958,360 over 6y, 61% of budgetSCHOOL & MAIN INSTITUTE INC — $3,930,666 over 6y, 51% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $3,907,278 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCETERA INC — $3,904,005 over 5y, 89% of budgetTHINK OF US — $3,821,102 over 6y, 16% of budgetStriveTogether Inc — $3,753,334 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetCENTER FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIAL POLICY — $3,534,365 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetPopulation Reference Bureau Inc — $3,162,254 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetLIVING CITIES INC THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE — $3,150,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetFUSION PARTNERSHIP INC — $2,824,392 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetPOLICYLINK — $2,737,500 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,734,400 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCENTER FOR LAW AND SOCIAL POLICY — $2,720,000 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $2,693,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $2,546,275 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $2,491,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL FUND FOR WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS — $2,486,751 over 4y, 55% of budgetTHE FORUM FOR YOUTH INVESTMENT — $2,459,000 over 6y, 9.2% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILDREN'S LAW AND POLICY — $2,399,000 over 5y, 38% of budgetYOUNG INVINCIBLES — $2,370,804 over 6y, 10% of budgetINSIDE-OUTSIDE CIRCLE FOUNDATION — $2,330,000 over 6y, 60% of budgetFUTURE FOCUSED EDUCATION — $2,304,500 over 4y, 34% of budgetREDF — $2,198,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $2,155,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLA PLAZITA INSTITUTE — $2,125,000 over 6y, 34% of budgetPRETRIAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE — $2,076,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION — $2,059,063 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE AMERICA — $2,024,620 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $2,006,335 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL SKILLS COALITION — $2,000,000 over 6y, 8.5% of budgetYOUTH POLICY INSTITUTE OF IOWA — $1,943,260 over 4y, 51% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC — $1,937,207 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc — $1,845,190 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFirst Focus on Children — $1,801,000 over 6y, 25% of budgetCHILDRENS ACTION ALLIANCE INC — $1,733,010 over 6y, 14% of budgetFAMILY LEAGUE OF BALTIMORE CITY INC — $1,705,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetRACE FORWARD — $1,677,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CASE COMMONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE URBAN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CHILD TRENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Center on Budget and Policy Priorities ↗
  • Who funds NEW AMERICA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE CIVIC FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds W HAYWOOD BURNS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICAS CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL & MAIN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CETERA INC ↗
  • Who funds THINK OF US ↗
  • Who funds StriveTogether Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIAL POLICY ↗
  • Who funds Population Reference Bureau Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIVING CITIES INC THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds FUSION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds POLICYLINK ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR LAW AND SOCIAL POLICY ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FUND FOR WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds THE FORUM FOR YOUTH INVESTMENT ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CHILDREN'S LAW AND POLICY ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG INVINCIBLES ↗
  • Who funds INSIDE-OUTSIDE CIRCLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FUTURE FOCUSED EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds REDF ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds LA PLAZITA INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds PRETRIAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Abell Foundation …Fund for Educational …T Rowe Price Foundati…France-Merrick Founda…The Morris Goldseker …Family League of Balt…Baltimore Community F…Center on Budget and …Partnership for Ameri…The Jacob and Hilda B…Public Welfare Founda…Alliance for Early Su…
The Abell Foundation IncMD127.1× affinity141 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Abell Foundation Inc · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc · T Rowe Price Foundation · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The Morris Goldseker Foundation of Maryland Inc · Family League of Baltimore City Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Center on Budget and Policy Priorities · Partnership for Americas Children · The Jacob and Hilda Blaustein Foundation Inc · Public Welfare Foundation Inc · Alliance for Early Success Fka Birth to Five Policy Alliance

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Annie E Casey Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Plummer Youth Promise Inc — 64% of income from government
  • Child Trends Inc — 50% of income from government
  • Education Northwest — 44% of income from government
  • Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Center for Urban Families Inc — 36% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • University of Delaware — 30% of income from government
  • Third Sector Capital Partners Inc — 16% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Cash Campaign of Maryland Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Jobs for the Future Inc — 11% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Restorative Response Baltimore Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
  • East Baltimore Development Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Fund for Educational Excellence Inc — 1% of income from government
  • National Consumer Law Center Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Achieving the Dream Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
50report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Annie E Casey Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Annie E Casey Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home