Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Sixteen Thirty Fund

SIXTEEN THIRTY FUND provides operational support to changemakers committed to tackling society's biggest social challenges.

$236M
Granted FY2024still arriving
318
Grants FY2024still arriving
41
States reached
$28M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Civil Rights$503MCommunity Improvement$266MEnvironment$225MPublic Benefit$87MArts & Culture$4.2MHealth$2.0MEducation$1.5MHousing & Shelter$998kOther$0
02FY2024 · 318 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k46 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k161 grants · $16M
  • $250k+109 grants · $219M
$115,000
Median grant
41
States reached
$107M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICA VOTES$27,850,000
FLORIDIANS PROTECTING FREEDOM$14,000,000
LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS$11,796,000
INSTITUTE FOR RESPONSIVE GOVERNMENT INC$8,000,000
REGISTER AMERICA$7,840,000
INSTITUTE FOR RESPONSIVE GOVERNMENT ACTION INC$7,700,000
CLIMATE EQUITY ACTION FUND$6,943,121
NORTH FUND$6,800,000
YOUR COMMUNITY PAC$6,695,000
CITIZENS NOT POLITICIANS$6,000,000
CLIMATE JOBS NATIONAL RESOURCE CENTER ACTION FUND$5,840,000
UNRIG OUR ECONOMY INC$5,103,446
MISSOURIANS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOM$4,500,000
WESTERN CONSERVATION ACTION$4,225,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC$4,050,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $15.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HEAT PUMP NATION: $2.3M → 10%SHELTER WF INC: $65k → 11%CITIZEN ACTION OF NEW YORK: $300k → 9%CITIZEN ACTION OF NEW YORK: $125k → 14%MOMSRISING TOGETHER: $80k → 9%PROGRESSIVE MARYLAND INC: $250k → 11%HEAT PUMP NATION: $635k → 10%JANNUS INC: $56k → 8%SHELTER WF INC: $63k → 11%CITIZEN ACTION OF NEW YORK: $100k → 9%CITIZEN ACTION OF NY: $65k → 14%MOMSRISING TOGETHER: $75k → 9%PROGRESSIVE MARYLAND INC: $100k → 11%NORTH STAR PROSPERITY: $1.8M → 14%MOMSRISING TOGETHER: $70k → 9%CASA IN ACTION: $540k → 11%NORTH STAR PROSPERITY: $600k → 14%DOWN HOME NORTH CAROLINA: $225k → 16%MOMSRISING TOGETHER: $60k → 9%CASA IN ACTION: $410k → 11%CALIFORNIA CALLS ACTION FUND: $75k → 14%FORWARD JUSTICE ACTION NETWORK: $50k → 8%DOWN HOME NORTH CAROLINA: $215k → 16%GEORGIA INVESTOR ACTION FUND INC: $600k → 14%CASA IN ACTION: $300k → 11%NC JUSTICE CENTER: $70k → 8%DOWN HOME NORTH CAROLINA: $75k → 16%CASA IN ACTION: $200k → 11%DOWN HOME NORTH CAROLINA: $50k → 16%EVERGREEN ACTION: $750k → 9%CASA IN ACTION: $150k → 11%CHIRLACTION FUND: $50k → 14%EVERGREEN ACTION: $300k → 9%CASA IN ACTION: $100k → 11%EVERGREEN ACTION: $120k → 9%TIDES CENTER: $50k → 10%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $540k → 11%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $305k → 11%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $165k → 11%NORTH CAROLINA A PHILIP RANDOLPH EDUCATIONAL FUND INC: $82k → 8%NCAAT IN ACTION: $450k → 8%NORTH CAROLINA A PHILIP RANDOLPH EDUCATIONAL FUND INC: $75k → 8%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $100k → 11%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $100k → 11%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $77k → 11%EVERGREEN ACTION: $635k → 14%SECURING AMERICAS FUTURE ENERGY ALLIANCE: $477k → 14%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$762M · 347 repeat orgs$265M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

347 repeat relationships — 183 still active in FY2024, 164 since wound down; 130 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

347
375

Total granted

$762M
$180M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
0%

Still filing today

83%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AV
    America Votes
    8× · 2017–2024 · $214M · revenue +495% · 37% of their budget
  • LO
    LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $56M · revenue +388%
  • UO
    UNRIG OUR ECONOMY INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $13M · revenue +118% · 100% of their budget

Funded once

  • FF
    FUTURE FORWARD USA ACTIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15M · revenue ×89
  • PT
    PROMOTE THE VOTE 2022
    one grant, 2022 · $10M · revenue -100% · 50% of their budget
  • V2
    VICTORY 2020
    one grant, 2020 · $7.7M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Powerswitch Action

Powerswitch action is a national network forging collective democracy and economies in our cities and states, together with our 21 grassroots affiliates.

Community Improvement
2
Power Coalition for Electoral Justice

We created the power coalition for electoral justice with our partners because this is a moment of opportunity; a time to dig in and become internationally strategic; in short, to use this movement to create a true paradigm shift. to plant…

Civil Rights
3
Bold Impact

Bold Impact is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting a democracy where all communities get to thrive.

Arts & Culture
4
Electoral Collective Action

Electoral Collective Action coordinates a broad-based coalition of existing entities active in the climate justice and community organizing space to raise public awareness and educational opportunities.

Civil Rights
5
Six Action

Six action realizes a bold policy agenda that secures and sustains meaningful racial, gender, social and economic justice outcomes that center the people most impacted by systemic and structural oppression. we support values-aligned state…

Civil Rights
6
Nextgen Climate Action

Nextgen america empowers young people to engage in the democratic process through voter registration and civic engagement on issues of public policy. this is achieved through innovative digital outreach, communications, and grassroots…

Unclassified
7
Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.

Environment
8
Issue One Action

Issue one action is uniting republicans, democrats, and independents to protect our elections and fix our political system. we are committed to free, fair, and secure elections and reducing the influence of well-financed special interests…

—
9
Policy Action for a Clean Tomorrow Inc

Clean Tomorrow advances policies that reduce climate emissions by turning policy ambition into action. We work to catalyze rapid change that will accelerate the innovation and growth of clean energy.

Environment
10
Act for America

Advocacy concerning democratic values, national security and defense; lobbying of government officials in favor of policies that further the defense of the u.s. and its constitution; development of coalitions with other organizations to…

Civil Rights
11
Network for Civic Action

Network for civic action advocates for the protection of democracy and encourages civic engagement. it evaluates programs and educates donors about how their donations can best serve those goals.

—
12
Transparent Elections for Grassroots Engagement 1

Support state initative petition

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Economic Security Project Action Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Terrell Bosley Anti-Violence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Pregnancy Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Immigrant Worker SupportMilitary Veterans SupportVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…School District FoundationsLgbtq+ Community SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Faith-Based Social ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Local Food System Organizat…Christian Missionary Organi…Women & Girls Leadership De…Youth Development ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community FoundationsPolicy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 18. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%20%<5yr14%23%5–10yr18%24%10–20yr18%17%20–35yr16%13%35–55yr15%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%19%<5yr14%16%5–10yr18%47%10–20yr18%5%20–35yr16%11%35–55yr15%2%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 20% of your grantees by number, and just 19% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%31/857
the rest of the field
13%
1,600/12,144

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

690 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 690 of the 861 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

204
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
210
Early backer (in before they grew)
628/690
Grantees still filing
340/690
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ADVANCING AZ — $22,706,000 · OtherADVANCING AZFLORIDIANS PROTECTING FREEDOM — $14,000,000 · Other+112 more — $361,724,666 · Other+112 moreAmerica Votes — $213,894,147 · Community ImprovementAmerica Votes+10 more — $24,385,713 · Community Improvement+10 moreLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC — $55,552,521 · Civil RightsLEAGUE OF CONS…FORWARD ACTION FUND — $8,067,388 · Civil RightsFORWARD ACTION…WESTERN CONSERVATION ACTION — $7,850,000 · Civil RightsWESTERN CONSER…RESPONSIVE GOV ACTION INC — $7,700,000 · Civil RightsRESPONSIVE GOV…COUNT MI VOTE — $6,420,000 · Civil Rights+27 more — $40,528,385 · Civil Rights+27 moreNORTH FUND — $49,822,934 · Public BenefitNORTH FUNDFUTURE FORWARD USA ACTION — $15,232,000 · Public BenefitFUTURE FORWAR…INSTITUTE FOR RESPONSIVE GOVERNMENT INC — $8,000,000 · Public BenefitINSTITUTE FOR…RUN FOR SOMETHING ACTION FUND — $6,086,000 · Public BenefitCENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS ACTION FUND — $5,355,000 · Public BenefitAB FOUNDATION — $4,580,000 · Public BenefitSECURE ELECTION PROJECT INC — $3,995,000 · Public Benefit+13 more — $24,555,664 · Public Benefit+13 moreCLIMATE EQUITY ACTION FUND — $11,193,121 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUND — $11,159,390 · EnvironmentCLIMATE JOBS NATIONAL RESOURCE CENTER ACTION FUND INC — $11,110,000 · EnvironmentENERGY ACTION FUND — $10,151,500 · EnvironmentThe Partnership Project Action Fund — $8,665,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENT AMERICA INC — $7,754,300 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE ACTION FUND — $5,200,000 · EnvironmentCounterspark Inc — $3,990,000 · Environment+7 more — $7,922,000 · EnvironmentHEAT PUMP NATION INC — $2,955,000 · Human ServicesNORTH STAR PROSPERITY — $2,432,500 · Human ServicesEVERGREEN ACTION — $1,804,599 · Human ServicesCASA IN ACTION INC — $1,700,000 · Human ServicesLIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA — $1,286,500 · Human ServicesWESTERN FUTURES FUND INC — $5,082,850 · PhilanthropyAAPI DEMOCRACY FUND — $2,845,500 · PhilanthropyHOPEWELL FUND — $1,852,230 · Philanthropy
Other$398,430,666Community Improvement$238,279,860Civil Rights$126,118,294Public Benefit$117,626,598Environment$77,145,311Human Services$10,178,599Philanthropy$9,780,580

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmerica Votes — $213,894,147 over 8y, 37% of budgetLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC — $55,552,521 over 8y, 16% of budgetNORTH FUND — $49,822,934 over 6y, 99% of budgetADVANCING AZ — $22,706,000 over 6y, 100% of budgetFLORIDIANS PROTECTING FREEDOM — $14,000,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetUNRIG OUR ECONOMY INC — $12,953,446 over 3y, 100% of budgetCLIMATE EQUITY ACTION FUND — $11,193,121 over 2y, 60% of budgetDEFENDING DEMOCRACY TOGETHER — $11,180,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $11,159,390 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetCLIMATE JOBS NATIONAL RESOURCE CENTER ACTION FUND INC — $11,110,000 over 3y, 99% of budgetPROMOTE THE VOTE 2022 — $10,400,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetENERGY ACTION FUND — $10,151,500 over 6y, 13% of budgetPiedmont Rising Inc — $8,795,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetThe Partnership Project Action Fund — $8,665,000 over 5y, 35% of budgetFORWARD ACTION FUND — $8,067,388 over 6y, 52% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR RESPONSIVE GOVERNMENT INC — $8,000,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetWESTERN CONSERVATION ACTION — $7,850,000 over 3y, 81% of budgetREGISTER AMERICA — $7,840,000 over 1y, 93% of budgetRocky Mountain Values — $7,767,478 over 5y, 100% of budgetENVIRONMENT AMERICA INC — $7,754,300 over 6y, 20% of budgetRESPONSIVE GOV ACTION INC — $7,700,000 over 1y, 63% of budgetSIERRA CLUB — $6,993,333 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetOhioans United for Reproductive Rights — $6,967,600 over 1y, 18% of budgetCitizens Not Politicians — $6,550,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetCOUNT MI VOTE — $6,420,000 over 4y, 38% of budgetNEVADANS FOR SECURE ELECTIONS — $6,250,000 over 1y, 64% of budgetRUN FOR SOMETHING ACTION FUND — $6,086,000 over 3y, 45% of budgetMAINE MOMENTUM — $5,786,000 over 2y, 97% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL — $5,725,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetMAINE PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE — $5,595,713 over 8y, 19% of budgetEMPIRE STATE VOICES INC — $5,384,206 over 2y, 100% of budgetCENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS ACTION FUND — $5,355,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetTIDES ADVOCACY — $5,288,837 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetPROGRESS NOW EDUCATION — $5,226,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE ACTION FUND — $5,200,000 over 6y, 10.0% of budgetWESTERN FUTURES FUND INC — $5,082,850 over 3y, 65% of budgetNRDC ACTION FUND INC — $5,076,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetAdvanced Energy United Inc — $5,000,000 over 2y, 46% of budgetOne Person One Vote — $5,000,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetWORKMONEY INC — $4,803,700 over 3y, 23% of budgetAB FOUNDATION — $4,580,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetMissourians for Constitutional Freedom — $4,500,000 over 1y, 68% of budgetAMPLIFY NEW HAMPSHIRE — $4,499,774 over 4y, 99% of budgetIowa Forward — $4,290,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC — $4,125,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetNEW DAY NEVADA — $4,118,500 over 6y, 59% of budgetSECURE ELECTION PROJECT INC — $3,995,000 over 5y, 100% of budgetCounterspark Inc — $3,990,000 over 3y, 51% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds America Votes ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH FUND ↗
  • Who funds ADVANCING AZ ↗
  • Who funds FUTURE FORWARD USA ACTION ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDIANS PROTECTING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds UNRIG OUR ECONOMY INC ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE EQUITY ACTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds DEFENDING DEMOCRACY TOGETHER ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE JOBS NATIONAL RESOURCE CENTER ACTION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PROMOTE THE VOTE 2022 ↗
  • Who funds ENERGY ACTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds Piedmont Rising Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Partnership Project Action Fund ↗
  • Who funds FORWARD ACTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR RESPONSIVE GOVERNMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN CONSERVATION ACTION ↗
  • Who funds REGISTER AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Rocky Mountain Values ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENT AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds RESPONSIVE GOV ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
  • Who funds Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights ↗
  • Who funds Citizens Not Politicians ↗
  • Who funds COUNT MI VOTE ↗
  • Who funds NEVADANS FOR SECURE ELECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds RUN FOR SOMETHING ACTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds MAINE MOMENTUM ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL ↗
  • Who funds MAINE PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds EMPIRE STATE VOICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS ACTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds TIDES ADVOCACY ↗
  • Who funds PROGRESS NOW EDUCATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

America VotesOpen Society Action F…Way to Win Action Fun…Tides AdvocacyAll Hands on Deck Net…North FundNEO Philanthropy Acti…Our American Future A…Women Donors Network …Energy Action FundCenter for Community …The Heising-Simons Ac…
America VotesDC216.9× affinity159 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: America Votes · Open Society Action Fund Inc · Way to Win Action Fund Inc · Tides Advocacy · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · North Fund · NEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc · Our American Future Action · Women Donors Network Action · Energy Action Fund · Center for Community Change Action · The Heising-Simons Action Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sixteen Thirty Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 110%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    11get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 861 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home