Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

CLEAN WATER ACTION

CLEAN WATER ACTION (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 33 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,965,452 to it, the largest being MICHIGAN CIVIC ACTION FUND ($750,000). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$5.9M
Revenue FY2024
33
Funders on record
$2.0M
Grants received
$952k
Net assets
15/33 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 8%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($8.8M) Expenses 100 ($8.2M) Net assets 100 ($70k)2018 Revenue 101 ($8.8M) Expenses 102 ($8.3M) Net assets 850 ($596k)2019 Revenue 100 ($8.8M) Expenses 107 ($8.7M) Net assets 908 ($637k)2020 Revenue 75 ($6.6M) Expenses 76 ($6.2M) Net assets 1476 ($1.0M)2021 Revenue 66 ($5.7M) Expenses 66 ($5.4M) Net assets 1928 ($1.4M)2022 Revenue 74 ($6.5M) Expenses 78 ($6.4M) Net assets 2043 ($1.4M)2023 Revenue 60 ($5.2M) Expenses 67 ($5.5M) Net assets 1669 ($1.2M)2024 Revenue 67 ($5.9M) Expenses 75 ($6.1M) Net assets 1357 ($952k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (67)Expenses (75)Net assets (1357)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$593k
17
$497k
18
$41k
19
$398k
20
$317k
21
$102k
22
$262k
23
$219k
24
1.3
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 8 funders to 5 funders, grant income rose $33k → $36k.

1 of 33 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)7% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CLEAN WATER ACTION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 33 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CLEAN WATER ACTION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 38% of grant income and the top three 75%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

98% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CLEAN WATER ACTION.

38%
largest funder
75%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 70% · 2018 98% · 2019 68% · 2020 32% · 2021 81% · 2022 62% · 2023 95%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

16% of CLEAN WATER ACTION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 45% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

CLEAN WATER ACTION draws 64% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 10 states in all.

WA
MI
MA
PA
NJ
CA
VA
NC
DC
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $143k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 33 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like CLEAN WATER ACTION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

58% of spending goes to programs.

Program 58%Management 19%Fundraising 23%

Governance

12
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 35 states

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
KS
AR
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
MS
AL
TX
FL

Part of a family of 2 related entities

  • Clean Water Fund · exempt
  • Citizens Campaign Inc · corp_trust

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CLEAN WATER ACTION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CLEAN WATER ACTION?
CLEAN WATER ACTION (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 33 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,965,452 to it, the largest being MICHIGAN CIVIC ACTION FUND ($750,000). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CLEAN WATER ACTION have?
IRS filings report 33 organizations giving $1,965,452 in grants to CLEAN WATER ACTION, 15 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CLEAN WATER ACTION?
MICHIGAN CIVIC ACTION FUND is the largest funder on record, with $750,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CLEAN WATER ACTION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 33funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing