Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit
WORKING AMERICA
WORKING AMERICA (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 38 organizations whose IRS filings report $57,294,112 to it, the largest being EVIDENCE FOR IMPACT ($16,000,000). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Women Donors Network Actionshared funders
- Office and Professional Employees International Unionportfolio match
- Grand Lodge International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workersportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2022 4%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base held at 7 funders, grant income rose $1.2M → $4.9M.
3 of 38 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 1% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
Left out of every figure on this page: $67M from 10 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations). These are real filings, and they are not money WORKING AMERICA raised.
From the IRS filings of WORKING AMERICA’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 38 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
WORKING AMERICA leans on a few funders — its largest provides 28% of grant income and the top three 62%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
99% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WORKING AMERICA.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 48% · 2018 49% · 2019 51% · 2020 40% · 2021 51% · 2022 59% · 2023 46% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
19% of WORKING AMERICA's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 39% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
84% of WORKING AMERICA's grant income comes from Washington, D.C. funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $675k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 38 funders put you well-backed among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Women Donors Network Actionshared fundersCA · backs 72 organizations that share your funders
- Office and Professional Employees International Unionportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Grand Lodge International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workersportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- International Assn of Bridge Structural Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workersportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- United Steelworkers Intl Group Returnportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Communications Workers of America Afl-Cio Clcportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workersportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Alliedportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- International Union of Painters and Allied Tradesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Grove Action Fundshared fundersCA · backs 47 organizations that share your funders
- Way to Win Action Fund Incshared fundersDC · backs 125 organizations that share your funders
- Wellness Advocacy Fundshared fundersMD · backs 34 organizations that share your funders
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like WORKING AMERICA
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Washington, D.C.
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
97% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 18 states
Part of a family of 2 related entities
- Afl-Cio · exempt
- Working America Independent Expenditure PAC · exempt
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WORKING AMERICA: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds WORKING AMERICA?
- WORKING AMERICA (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 38 organizations whose IRS filings report $57,294,112 to it, the largest being EVIDENCE FOR IMPACT ($16,000,000). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does WORKING AMERICA have?
- IRS filings report 38 organizations giving $57,294,112 in grants to WORKING AMERICA, 15 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of WORKING AMERICA?
- EVIDENCE FOR IMPACT is the largest funder on record, with $16,000,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like WORKING AMERICA find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 38funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing