Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Women Donors Network Action

To channel collective power and resources in solidarity with movements to advance the organization's vision of creating a just and sustainable world where everyone can safely and freely determine their own futures.

$11M
Granted FY2024still arriving
73
Grants FY2024still arriving
21
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Civil Rights$20MPublic Benefit$9.6MHuman Services$2.0MCommunity Improvement$1.3MEnvironment$837kArts & Culture$200kPhilanthropy$200kCrime & Legal$140kOther$0
02FY2024 · 73 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k56 grants · $6.8M
  • $250k+12 grants · $3.6M
$100,000
Median grant
21
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEORGIA INVESTOR ACTION FUND INC$400,000
ADVANCE NORTH CAROLINA INC$300,000
ORGANIZE PENNSYLVANIA DBA ONE PA$300,000
CARE IN ACTION INC$300,000
OUR VOICE OUR VOTE ARIZONA$300,000
RURAL ARIZONA ACTION$300,000
REPOWER$300,000
ONE APIA NEVADA$300,000
LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA$300,000
NCAAT IN ACTION$300,000
MAKE THE ROAD ACTION INC$300,000
ASIAN AMERICAN ADVOCACY FUND INC$250,000
EQUALITY FEDERATION$235,000
PODER NC ACTION$220,000
BALLOT INITIATIVE STRATEGY CENTER INC$200,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $3.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $300k → 11%NCAAT IN ACTION: $300k → 8%CASA IN ACTION INC: $150k → 11%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $200k → 11%ACCELERATE ACTION: $100k → 16%NCAAT IN ACTION: $100k → 8%DOWN HOME NORTH CAROLINA INC: $200k → 16%GEORGIA INVESTOR ACTION FUND INC: $400k → 14%CASA IN ACTION INC: $100k → 11%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $200k → 11%NCAAT IN ACTION: $100k → 8%DOWN HOME NORTH CAROLINA INC: $200k → 16%GEORGIA INVESTOR ACTION FUND INC: $330k → 14%CASA IN ACTION: $100k → 11%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $50k → 11%NCAAT IN ACTION: $50k → 8%DOWN HOME NORTH CAROLINA INC: $100k → 16%GEORGIA INVESTOR ACTION FUND INC: $200k → 14%CASA IN ACTION: $50k → 11%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $50k → 11%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
PA
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$31M · 65 repeat orgs$3.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

65 repeat relationships — 50 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

65
33

Total granted

$31M
$2.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
-4%

Still filing today

95%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22’23’24
Civil RightsPublic BenefitHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    TIDES ADVOCACY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +130%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +817%
  • GI
    Georgia Investor Action Fund Inc
    4× · 2020–2024 · $930k · revenue +232%

Funded once

  • PM
    Progress Michigan Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue -27%
  • CP
    COLORADO PEOPLE'S ACTION
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -80% · 28% of their budget
  • AA
    ACCELERATE ACTION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +198%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Powerswitch Action

Powerswitch action is a national network forging collective democracy and economies in our cities and states, together with our 21 grassroots affiliates.

Community Improvement
2
Six Action

Six action realizes a bold policy agenda that secures and sustains meaningful racial, gender, social and economic justice outcomes that center the people most impacted by systemic and structural oppression. we support values-aligned state…

Civil Rights
3
Bold Impact

Bold Impact is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting a democracy where all communities get to thrive.

Arts & Culture
4
America Votes

The Organization was established to coordinate and promote progressive issues, policies, initiatives, and referenda, and to pursue electoral reform that expands access to the ballot.

Community Improvement
5
New American Leaders Action Fund Inc

New american leaders action fund (nalaf) is building a democracy that represents and includes all people by engaging new voters, supporting new americans as they run for office, and expanding civic engagement.

Civil Rights
6
Black in Action Collective

Black in Action Collective exists to build Black political power to transform systems and radically reimagine what is possible for ourselves, our families, and our communities

Civil Rights
7
Missouri Jobs With Justice Voter Action

To develop and advocate for legislation, regulations, ballot initiatives, and government programs as a voice of the working class, to promote social justice, and to stimulate the economy; and, to conduct research, educate the public, and…

Civil Rights
8
Power Coalition for Electoral Justice

We created the power coalition for electoral justice with our partners because this is a moment of opportunity; a time to dig in and become internationally strategic; in short, to use this movement to create a true paradigm shift. to plant…

Civil Rights
9
Organize for Justice

Organize for justice develops diverse campaign leadership by passing on innovations and relationships from one generation of organizers to the next. the organization strives to create public support on issues affecting working americans.

—
10
New Jersey Citizen Action

To protect and expand the rights of citizens of the state of new jersey, and encourage active citizen involvement in campaigns promoting economic, social and racial equity.

—
11
Right to Democracy Action

Advance democracy, equity, and self-determination in u.s. territories, including by promoting civic engagement among the territorial diaspora throughout the united states.

—
12
League of Women Voters of New Jersey

Through grassroots people-powered advocacy and organizing, lwvnj trains, mobilizes, and educates advocates to have a greater voice in government and influence public policy.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leaders Igniting Transformation Action Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Avow Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyYouth Development ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Environmental Conservation …Jewish Community Organizati…Pregnancy Support ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 10 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%19%<5yr14%29%5–10yr19%36%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%3%35–55yr16%0%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%10%<5yr14%36%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%1%35–55yr16%0%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 19% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%4/121
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,444

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

114 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 114 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
36
Early backer (in before they grew)
109/114
Grantees still filing
62/114
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS — $1,120,000 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICSMAKE THE ROAD ACTION INC — $925,000 · Civil RightsMAKE THE ROAD ACTION INCWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC — $800,000 · Civil RightsASIAN AMERICAN ADVOCACY FUND INC — $750,000 · Civil RightsCare in Action Inc — $750,000 · Civil RightsOUR VOICE OUR VOTE ARIZONA — $750,000 · Civil RightsPODER NC ACTION — $720,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ACTION — $700,000 · Civil RightsCAROLINA FEDERATION — $625,000 · Civil RightsORGANIZE PENNSYLVANIA — $600,000 · Civil RightsFLORIDA RISING INC — $590,000 · Civil RightsRURAL ARIZONA ACTION — $550,000 · Civil Rights+36 more — $7,307,000 · Civil Rights+36 moreTIDES ADVOCACY — $2,018,000 · OtherTIDES ADVOCACYNEW GEORGIA PROJECT ACTION FUND — $900,000 · OtherNEW GEORGIA PROJECT ACTION FUNDBALLOT INITIATIVE STRATEGY CENTER INC — $800,000 · OtherBALLOT INITIATIVE STRATEGY CENTER I…Black Voters Matter Fund Inc — $752,500 · OtherBlack Voters Matter Fund IncUNITED WE DREAM ACTION — $735,000 · OtherUNITED WE DREAM ACTIONASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER POLITICAL AL LIANCE — $650,000 · OtherASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER POLITICAL AL…NEXTGEN CLIMATE ACTION — $500,000 · OtherPROGRESSIVE CAUCUS ACTION FUND — $450,000 · OtherPOWER ACTION FUND — $400,000 · Other+31 more — $3,540,000 · Other+31 moreGeorgia Investor Action Fund Inc — $930,000 · Human ServicesGeorgia Inv…LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA — $850,000 · Human ServicesLIVING UNIT…NCAAT IN ACTION — $550,000 · Human ServicesNCAAT IN AC…DOWN HOME NC — $500,000 · Human ServicesDOWN HOME N…CASA IN ACTION INC — $400,000 · Human ServicesCASA IN ACT…+2 more — $180,000 · Human ServicesREPOWER — $800,000 · Public BenefitUltraViolet Action — $382,750 · Public BenefitNew Era Colorado Action Fund — $275,000 · Public BenefitInstituto Power — $250,000 · Public BenefitProgress Michigan Inc — $200,000 · Public BenefitTAKEACTION MINNESOTA — $150,000 · Public BenefitNEW LEFT ACCELERATOR — $100,000 · Public BenefitCENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE ACTION — $100,000 · Public BenefitADVANCE NORTH CAROLINA INC — $550,000 · Community ImprovementMIJENTE — $230,000 · Community ImprovementBATTLE BORN PROGRESS — $100,000 · Community ImprovementWe Vote We Win — $100,000 · Community ImprovementMAINE PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE — $50,000 · Community ImprovementDETROIT HISPANIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $50,000 · Community ImprovementONE APIA NEVADA — $500,000 · InternationalA NEW POLICY INC — $50,000 · InternationalPROGRESSNOW COLORADO — $52,000 · EducationFAIR FIGHT ACTION INC — $50,000 · EducationRESOURCE IMPACT — $50,000 · EducationWORKERS DEFENSE PROJECT — $50,000 · Education
Civil Rights$16,187,000Other$10,745,500Human Services$3,410,000Public Benefit$2,257,750Community Improvement$1,080,000International$550,000Education$202,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTIDES ADVOCACY — $2,018,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS — $1,120,000 over 5y, 24% of budgetGeorgia Investor Action Fund Inc — $930,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetMAKE THE ROAD ACTION INC — $925,000 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT ACTION FUND — $900,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetLIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA — $850,000 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetBALLOT INITIATIVE STRATEGY CENTER INC — $800,000 over 6y, 8.9% of budgetREPOWER — $800,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC — $800,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetBlack Voters Matter Fund Inc — $752,500 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN ADVOCACY FUND INC — $750,000 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetCare in Action Inc — $750,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetOUR VOICE OUR VOTE ARIZONA — $750,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetUNITED WE DREAM ACTION — $735,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetPODER NC ACTION — $720,000 over 5y, 22% of budgetALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ACTION — $700,000 over 5y, 6.6% of budgetCAROLINA FEDERATION — $625,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetORGANIZE PENNSYLVANIA — $600,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetFLORIDA RISING INC — $590,000 over 7y, 7.1% of budgetRURAL ARIZONA ACTION — $550,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetADVANCE NORTH CAROLINA INC — $550,000 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetNCAAT IN ACTION — $550,000 over 5y, 6.5% of budgetVOCES DE LA FRONTERA ACTION INC — $500,000 over 4y, 8.4% of budgetNEXTGEN CLIMATE ACTION — $500,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetDOWN HOME NC — $500,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetWe The People Action Fund — $500,000 over 4y, 9.6% of budgetONE APIA NEVADA — $500,000 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetFORWARD ACTION FUND — $450,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetPROGRESSIVE CAUCUS ACTION FUND — $450,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetARIZONA WINS — $400,000 over 5y, 6.2% of budgetCASA IN ACTION INC — $400,000 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetNEW VIRGINIA MAJORITY — $400,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetPOWER ACTION FUND — $400,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetUltraViolet Action — $382,750 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetLEADERS IGNITING TRANSFORMATION ACTION FUND INC — $350,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetCenter For Racial and Gender E NFP — $350,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetPODER — $350,000 over 5y, 22% of budgetACTION FOR LIBERATION — $350,000 over 4y, 9.5% of budgetTEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT — $325,000 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetFreedom Action Now — $320,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetEQUALITY FEDERATION — $310,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetSISTER DISTRICT ACTION NETWORK — $300,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetHigher Heights for America — $300,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetCOLOR ACTION FUND — $285,000 over 5y, 22% of budgetNew Era Colorado Action Fund — $275,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetInstituto Power — $250,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetTEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK — $250,000 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetMIJENTE — $230,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TIDES ADVOCACY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS ↗
  • Who funds Georgia Investor Action Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAKE THE ROAD ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW GEORGIA PROJECT ACTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds BALLOT INITIATIVE STRATEGY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds REPOWER ↗
  • Who funds WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Black Voters Matter Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN ADVOCACY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Care in Action Inc ↗
  • Who funds OUR VOICE OUR VOTE ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WE DREAM ACTION ↗
  • Who funds PODER NC ACTION ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ACTION ↗
  • Who funds CAROLINA FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds ORGANIZE PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA RISING INC ↗
  • Who funds RURAL ARIZONA ACTION ↗
  • Who funds ADVANCE NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds NCAAT IN ACTION ↗
  • Who funds VOCES DE LA FRONTERA ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEXTGEN CLIMATE ACTION ↗
  • Who funds DOWN HOME NC ↗
  • Who funds We The People Action Fund ↗
  • Who funds ONE APIA NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds FORWARD ACTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS ACTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA WINS ↗
  • Who funds CASA IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW VIRGINIA MAJORITY ↗
  • Who funds POWER ACTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds UltraViolet Action ↗
  • Who funds LEADERS IGNITING TRANSFORMATION ACTION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Center For Racial and Gender E NFP ↗
  • Who funds PODER ↗
  • Who funds ACTION FOR LIBERATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Way to Win Action Fun…Tides AdvocacyAll Hands on Deck Net…Open Society Action F…Sixteen Thirty FundAmerica VotesNEO Philanthropy Acti…Tides FoundationPro-Democracy CampaignState Engagement FundNorth FundThe Heising-Simons Ac…
Way to Win Action Fund IncDC151.5× affinity73 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Way to Win Action Fund Inc · Tides Advocacy · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Open Society Action Fund Inc · Sixteen Thirty Fund · America Votes · NEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc · Tides Foundation · Pro-Democracy Campaign · State Engagement Fund · North Fund · The Heising-Simons Action Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Women Donors Network Action funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 60%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 115 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home