Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Nevada · Nonprofit

Nevada Conservation League

Nevada Conservation League (Nevada) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,368,943 to it, the largest being LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC ($5,755,943). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$2.2M
Revenue FY2024
10
Funders on record
$8.4M
Grants received
$818k
Net assets
3/10 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 98%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($964k) Expenses 100 ($907k) Net assets 100 ($403k)2018 Revenue 735 ($7.1M) Expenses 758 ($6.9M) Net assets 154 ($620k)2019 Revenue 79 ($761k) Expenses 109 ($988k) Net assets 98 ($393k)2020 Revenue 95 ($916k) Expenses 116 ($1.1M) Net assets 63 ($254k)2021 Revenue 94 ($909k) Expenses 89 ($803k) Net assets 89 ($361k)2022 Revenue 122 ($1.2M) Expenses 125 ($1.1M) Net assets 100 ($404k)2023 Revenue 76 ($732k) Expenses 57 ($520k) Net assets 153 ($615k)2024 Revenue 224 ($2.2M) Expenses 216 ($2.0M) Net assets 203 ($818k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (224)Expenses (216)Net assets (203)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$57k
17
$217k
18
$227k
19
$139k
20
$106k
21
$43k
22
$212k
23
$202k
24
5.0
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 3 funders to 2 funders, grant income fell $932k → $579k.

1 of 10 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)1% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Nevada Conservation League’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Nevada Conservation League leans on a few funders — its largest provides 69% of grant income and the top three 95%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Nevada Conservation League.

69%
largest funder
95%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 52% · 2018 100% · 2019 55% · 2020 100% · 2021 82% · 2022 55% · 2023 66%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

25% of Nevada Conservation League's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 30% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

Nevada Conservation League draws 92% of its grant income from funders outside Nevada, across 6 states in all.

WA
NY
NV
CA
CO
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Nevada out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $50k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 10 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like Nevada Conservation League

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Nevada

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

91% of spending goes to programs.

Program 91%Management 3%Fundraising 5%

Governance

9
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • NV Conservation League Education Fund · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Nevada Conservation League: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Nevada Conservation League?
Nevada Conservation League (Nevada) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,368,943 to it, the largest being LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC ($5,755,943). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Nevada Conservation League have?
IRS filings report 10 organizations giving $8,368,943 in grants to Nevada Conservation League, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Nevada Conservation League?
LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC is the largest funder on record, with $5,755,943 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Nevada Conservation League find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Nevada. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 10funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing