Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Center for Community Change Action

The CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE ACTION builds the power and capacity of low-income people, especially low-income people of color, to change the policies and institutions that impact their lives.(mission statement continued on schedule o)"community change action" works to dramatically improve material conditions for people struggling to…

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Public Benefit$11MCivil Rights$8.0MHuman Services$2.5MCommunity Improvement$712kEmployment$628kEducation$330kCrime & Legal$230kPublic Safety & Disaster$115kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$100,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY CHANGE VOTERS$250,000
WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC$244,000
INDIVISIBLE PROJECT$160,000
MOVEONORG CIVIC ACTION$120,000
COLOROFCHANGEORG$120,000
CARE IN ACTION$120,000
FAITH IN MINNESOTA$100,000
MAINE PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE$100,000
STAND UP FOR OHIO- OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE$100,000
ORGANIZERS IN THE LAND OF ENCHANTMENT (OLE)$100,000
FAMILY FORWARD ACTION$100,000
PARENT VOICES ACTION$50,000
CENTER FOR RACIAL AND GENDER EQUITY NFP$25,000
AMERICA VOTES$10,000
TIDES ADVOCACY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $100k → 11%SIREN: $20k → 8%CHIRLA ACTION FUND: $196k → 14%CITIZEN ACTION OF NEW YORK INC: $25k → 14%ARKANSAS UNITED COMMUNITY COALITION: $23k → 14%FAMILY FORWARD OREGON: $80k → 12%COMUNIDADES UNIDAS: $5k → 8%GEORGIAINVESTOR ACTION FUND INC: $70k → 14%UNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $25k → 7%FAITH IN INDIANA INC: $15k → 16%CASA IN ACTION: $333k → 11%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $75k → 11%SIREN: $16k → 8%CHIRLA ACTION FUND: $135k → 14%CITIZEN ACTION OF NEW YORK INC: $20k → 14%ARKANSAS UNITED COMMUNITY COALITION: $11k → 14%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA ACTION: $110k → 17%IMMIGRANT WORKERS CITIZENSHIP PROJECT: $50k → 13%CASA IN ACTION: $290k → 11%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $40k → 11%SIREN: $5k → 8%CHIRLA ACTION FUND: $66k → 14%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA ACTION: $51k → 17%LATIN AMERICAN COALITION: $21k → 10%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $33k → 11%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $44k → 17%ACCE ACTION: $35k → 14%CASA IN ACTION: $20k → 11%MAKE THE ROAD NY ACTION FUND: $21k → 20%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $15k → 17%NEW YORK STATE IMMIGRANT ACTION FUND: $80k → 17%EL CENTRO DE IGUALDAD Y DERECHOS: $15k → 14%MOMSRISING TOGETHER: $290k → 9%NEW YORK STATE IMMIGRANT ACTION FUND: $33k → 17%MAKE THE ROAD NY ACTION FUND: $15k → 20%NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS (NPNA): $20k → 14%COLORADO PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE: $24k → 12%COMMUNITY VOICES HEARD POWER: $45k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$20M · 60 repeat orgs$3.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

60 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 45 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
81

Total granted

$20M
$3.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
0%

Still filing today

83%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitCrime & LegalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $940k · revenue +42%
  • AV
    AMERICA'S VOICE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $933k · revenue +2% · 36% of their budget
  • TO
    THE OHIO ORGANIZING CAMPAIGN
    7× · 2017–2024 · $818k · revenue ×14 · 93% of their budget

Funded once

  • MT
    MOMSRISING TOGETHER
    one grant, 2021 · $290k · revenue -52%
  • AB
    A BETTER BIG SKYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue ×19 · 38% of their budget
  • AW
    ARIZONA WINS
    one grant, 2017 · $150k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado People's Action

Colorado people's action (cpa) is a member-driven, racial justice organization dedicated to winning long-lasting progressive public policies in colorado. cpa builds power by mobilizing voters, electing our own people to office, holding…

—
2
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
3
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
4
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
5
Justice Action Center

Justice Action Center JAC pilots an innovative model that advances the rights of immigrant communities by connecting cutting-edge impact litigation and compelling narrative and communications content. The purpose of JAC is to advance the…

Civil Rights
6
Six Action

Six action realizes a bold policy agenda that secures and sustains meaningful racial, gender, social and economic justice outcomes that center the people most impacted by systemic and structural oppression. we support values-aligned state…

Civil Rights
7
New Jersey Citizen Action

To protect and expand the rights of citizens of the state of new jersey, and encourage active citizen involvement in campaigns promoting economic, social and racial equity.

—
8
Working Washington

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

—
9
Virginia Coalition for Immigrant Rights

VACIR is a multi-racial and multi-ethnic coalition of organizations that exists to win dignity, power and quality of life for all immigrant and refugee communities.

Human Services
10
Organize for Justice

Organize for justice develops diverse campaign leadership by passing on innovations and relationships from one generation of organizers to the next. the organization strives to create public support on issues affecting working americans.

—
11
Missouri Jobs With Justice Voter Action

To develop and advocate for legislation, regulations, ballot initiatives, and government programs as a voice of the working class, to promote social justice, and to stimulate the economy; and, to conduct research, educate the public, and…

Civil Rights
12
Powerswitch Action

Powerswitch action is a national network forging collective democracy and economies in our cities and states, together with our 21 grassroots affiliates.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadmo Action and the most unlike its peers is Gamaliel Faith & Democracy Campaign. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Pregnancy Support ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Youth Development ServicesSchool District FoundationsSenior Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyEnvironmental Conservation …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Immigrant Worker Support
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr14%26%5–10yr19%29%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%2%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%7%<5yr14%25%5–10yr19%29%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr16%1%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%4/142
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,423

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

126 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 126 of the 142 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

17
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
43
Early backer (in before they grew)
123/126
Grantees still filing
73/126
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WIN JUSTICE — $2,698,500 · OtherWIN JUSTICECOMMUNITY CHANGE VOTERS PAC — $2,089,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CHANGE VOTERS PACTIDES ADVOCACY — $649,000 · OtherTIDES ADVOCACYUNITED WE DREAM ACTION — $405,000 · Other+47 more — $3,594,134 · Other+47 moreWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC — $940,000 · Civil RightsWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INCAMERICA'S VOICE — $933,114 · Civil RightsAMERICA'S VOICETHE OHIO ORGANIZING CAMPAIGN — $817,904 · Civil RightsTHE OHIO ORGANIZING CAMPAIGNFLORIDA RISING INC — $619,600 · Civil RightsFLORIDA RISING INCFAITH IN MINNESOTA — $525,000 · Civil RightsFAITH IN MINNESOTAMAKE THE ROAD ACTION INC — $475,000 · Civil RightsMAKE THE ROAD ACTION INCMichigan Peoples Campaign — $464,310 · Civil RightsMichigan Peoples CampaignPROGRESSIVE LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE OF NEVADA ACTION — $308,245 · Civil RightsMI FAMILIA VOTA — $270,000 · Civil Rights+30 more — $2,014,178 · Civil Rights+30 moreCASA IN ACTION INC — $753,000 · Human ServicesCASA IN ACTIO…Californians for Human Immigrant Rights Leadership Action Fund — $397,199 · Human ServicesCalifornians …MOMSRISING TOGETHER — $290,000 · Human ServicesMOMSRISING TO…LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA — $248,000 · Human ServicesLIVING UNITED…VOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC — $219,000 · Human ServicesVOCES DE LA F…NEW YORK STATE IMMIGRANT ACTION FUND INCORPORATED — $148,500 · Human ServicesNEW YORK STAT…DOWN HOME NC — $109,500 · Human Services+17 more — $585,150 · Human Services+17 moreORGANIZERS IN THE LAND OF ENCHANTMENT — $710,000 · Community ImprovementORGANIZERS…MAINE PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE — $612,500 · Community ImprovementMAINE PEOP…FAMILY FORWARD ACTION — $300,000 · Community ImprovementFAMILY FOR…A BETTER BIG SKY — $150,000 · Community ImprovementA BETTER B…CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE — $100,000 · Community Improvement+7 more — $297,000 · Community Improvement+7 moreMICHIGAN ORGANIZING STRATEGY ENABLING STRENGTH ACTION — $308,620 · Public BenefitONEAMERICA — $277,500 · Public BenefitCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities — $75,000 · Public BenefitBEND THE ARC JEWISH ACTION INC — $50,000 · Public BenefitTAKEACTION MINNESOTA — $45,000 · Public Benefit+2 more — $35,000 · Public BenefitMoveOnorg Civic Action — $420,000 · EducationParent Voices Action — $185,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · EducationCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY ACTION FUND INC — $30,000 · EducationNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST — $77,400 · Crime & LegalMake the Road New York — $75,800 · Crime & LegalCENTER FOR LAW AND SOCIAL POLICY — $50,000 · Crime & LegalKansas Appleseed Center for Law and Justice Inc — $20,000 · Crime & LegalDecarcerate Inc — $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$9,435,634Civil Rights$7,367,351Human Services$2,750,349Community Improvement$2,169,500Public Benefit$791,120Education$685,000Crime & Legal$233,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC — $940,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICA'S VOICE — $933,114 over 5y, 36% of budgetTHE OHIO ORGANIZING CAMPAIGN — $817,904 over 7y, 93% of budgetCASA IN ACTION INC — $753,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetORGANIZERS IN THE LAND OF ENCHANTMENT — $710,000 over 6y, 9.9% of budgetTIDES ADVOCACY — $649,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetFLORIDA RISING INC — $619,600 over 5y, 15% of budgetMAINE PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE — $612,500 over 6y, 8.1% of budgetFAITH IN MINNESOTA — $525,000 over 6y, 9.6% of budgetMAKE THE ROAD ACTION INC — $475,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetMichigan Peoples Campaign — $464,310 over 6y, 33% of budgetMoveOnorg Civic Action — $420,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetUNITED WE DREAM ACTION — $405,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetCalifornians for Human Immigrant Rights Leadership Action Fund — $397,199 over 3y, 43% of budgetPROGRESSIVE LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE OF NEVADA ACTION — $308,245 over 6y, 11% of budgetFAMILY FORWARD ACTION — $300,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetMOMSRISING TOGETHER — $290,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCIRC ACTION FUND — $282,650 over 4y, 42% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT ACTION FUND — $280,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetONEAMERICA — $277,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetMI FAMILIA VOTA — $270,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetMOTHERING JUSTICE ACTION FUND — $258,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetLIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA — $248,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetILLINOIS IMMIGRANT ACTION INC — $242,178 over 5y, 27% of budgetVOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC — $219,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetINDIVISIBLE PROJECT — $210,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetOUR VOICE OUR VOTE ARIZONA — $200,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetCare in Action Inc — $200,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetParent Voices Action — $185,000 over 4y, 36% of budgetCOLOROFCHANGEORG — $170,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetUnited for Respect — $168,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetFLIC VOTES INC — $167,260 over 4y, 11% of budgetA BETTER BIG SKY — $150,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetNEW YORK STATE IMMIGRANT ACTION FUND INCORPORATED — $148,500 over 3y, 41% of budgetNEW JERSEY ORGANIZING PROJECT INC — $140,000 over 4y, 29% of budgetFAMILY VALUES WORK ACTION INC — $110,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetDOWN HOME NC — $109,500 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetPODER NC ACTION — $100,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetGrassroots Illinois Action — $100,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA CITIZEN ACTION GROUP — $100,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetPennsylvania United — $100,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetRIGHTS & DEMOCRACY PROJECT INC — $100,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetACCION POLITICA PCUNISTA DBA PCUN — $95,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetLEADERS IGNITING TRANSFORMATION ACTION FUND INC — $80,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetFAMILY FORWARD OREGON — $80,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetACTION TOGETHER NEPA — $80,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST — $77,400 over 3y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA'S VOICE ↗
  • Who funds THE OHIO ORGANIZING CAMPAIGN ↗
  • Who funds CASA IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds ORGANIZERS IN THE LAND OF ENCHANTMENT ↗
  • Who funds TIDES ADVOCACY ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA RISING INC ↗
  • Who funds MAINE PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds FAITH IN MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds MAKE THE ROAD ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Michigan Peoples Campaign ↗
  • Who funds MoveOnorg Civic Action ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WE DREAM ACTION ↗
  • Who funds Californians for Human Immigrant Rights Leadership Action Fund ↗
  • Who funds PROGRESSIVE LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE OF NEVADA ACTION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY FORWARD ACTION ↗
  • Who funds MOMSRISING TOGETHER ↗
  • Who funds CIRC ACTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds NEW GEORGIA PROJECT ACTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds ONEAMERICA ↗
  • Who funds MI FAMILIA VOTA ↗
  • Who funds MOTHERING JUSTICE ACTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS IMMIGRANT ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds VOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIVISIBLE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds OUR VOICE OUR VOTE ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds Care in Action Inc ↗
  • Who funds Parent Voices Action ↗
  • Who funds COLOROFCHANGEORG ↗
  • Who funds United for Respect ↗
  • Who funds FLIC VOTES INC ↗
  • Who funds A BETTER BIG SKY ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK STATE IMMIGRANT ACTION FUND INCORPORATED ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sixteen Thirty FundTides AdvocacyAll Hands on Deck Net…America VotesOpen Society Action F…Way to Win Action Fun…Center for Community …NEO Philanthropy Acti…Women Donors Network …Tides FoundationWorking Families Orga…Pro-Democracy Campaign
Sixteen Thirty FundDC115.9× affinity65 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sixteen Thirty Fund · Tides Advocacy · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · America Votes · Open Society Action Fund Inc · Way to Win Action Fund Inc · Center for Community Change · NEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc · Women Donors Network Action · Tides Foundation · Working Families Organization Inc · Pro-Democracy Campaign

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Center for Community Change Action funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 142 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines