Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

PROGRESSIVE STATE LEADERS COMMITTEE INC

PROGRESSIVE STATE LEADERS COMMITTEE INC (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 20 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,007,854 to it, the largest being America Votes ($1,000,000). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$5.2M
Funders on record
20
Grants received
$6.0M
Net assets
$1.0M
6/20 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 52%
01What it does

What Progressive State Leaders Committee Inc does

Mission

The corporation is organized to develop, advocate for, or assist with the implementation of innovative and progressive public policies in areas related to the influence, work, or varied powers of state attorneys general.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

On its FY2024 return the organization reported starting a significant new program.

Progressive state leaders committee conducted an education program in north carolina on the role of the state attorney general, convened a series of working groups with partners, and supported a convening of chiefs of staff to state attorneys general. Pslc also ran a fellowship program centered around democracy and election protection.

Its own explanation, from Schedule O of that return (Part III, line 2).

  1. Other policy initiatives: progressive state leaders committee conducted 4 policy conferences that convened state attorney general and partners and covered topics including healthcare accessibility, housing crisis, artificial intelligence, and public safety.

    $2,362,741 spentof which $1,001,750 as grants
    68% of program spending
  2. Pslc conducted an education program in north carolina centered around the role of the state attorney general.

    $957,779 spent
    27% of program spending
  3. Fellowship programs: pslc ran a fellowship program centered around democracy and election protection; fellows provided research and support to pslc and state attorneys general offices.

    $152,796 spent
    4% of program spending
  4. Pslc hosted a series of working groups connecting attorney general offices with outside partners. Pslc also hosted a retreat for chiefs of staff of state attorney general offices to discuss best practices for attorney general offices.

    $25,756 spent
    1% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $3,499,072.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($1.1M) Expenses 100 ($1.5M) Net assets 100 ($28k)2019 Revenue 75 ($798k) Expenses 53 ($775k) Net assets 180 ($50k)2020 Revenue 1996 ($21M) Expenses 839 ($12M) Net assets 32797 ($9.2M)2021 Revenue 93 ($995k) Expenses 657 ($9.6M) Net assets 2151 ($601k)2022 Revenue 454 ($4.8M) Expenses 343 ($5.0M) Net assets 1614 ($451k)2023 Revenue 108 ($1.2M) Expenses 117 ($1.7M) Net assets -385 ($-107603)2024 Revenue 491 ($5.2M) Expenses 281 ($4.1M) Net assets 3745 ($1.0M)
2018201920202021202220232024
Revenue (491)Expenses (281)Net assets (3745)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $127k to $13M (+10229%).

$29k
$127k
$13M
$672k
$858k
$283k
$1.5M
2018201920202021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

−$386k
’18
$22k
’19
$9.1M
’20
−$8.6M
’21
−$150k
’22
−$558k
’23
$1.2M
’24
3.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Michelle Ortiz

Executive director (see schedule o)

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

2018201920202021202220232024
Listed5566666
Joined·+1+1+1+3+0+0
No longer listed·101300
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose $200k → $215k.

2 of 20 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 7% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $5.0M from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest The Leadership Center for Attorney General Studies). These are real filings, and they are not money PROGRESSIVE STATE LEADERS COMMITTEE INC raised.

From the IRS filings of PROGRESSIVE STATE LEADERS COMMITTEE INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PROGRESSIVE STATE LEADERS COMMITTEE INC has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 17% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PROGRESSIVE STATE LEADERS COMMITTEE INC.

17%
largest funder
45%
top three
~9
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 75% · 2018 55% · 2019 91% · 2020 47% · 2021 50% · 2022 40% · 2023 47% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

60% of PROGRESSIVE STATE LEADERS COMMITTEE INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 30% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

54% of PROGRESSIVE STATE LEADERS COMMITTEE INC's grant income comes from Washington, D.C. funders.

IL
WI
NY
CA
AR
DC
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $420k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like PROGRESSIVE STATE LEADERS COMMITTEE INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

86% of spending goes to programs.

Program 86%Management 9%Fundraising 6%

Governance

3
board members
67%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 17 states

ME
WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
OR
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
VA
MD
NC
SC
FL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PROGRESSIVE STATE LEADERS COMMITTEE INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PROGRESSIVE STATE LEADERS COMMITTEE INC?
PROGRESSIVE STATE LEADERS COMMITTEE INC (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 20 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,007,854 to it, the largest being America Votes ($1,000,000). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PROGRESSIVE STATE LEADERS COMMITTEE INC have?
IRS filings report 20 organizations giving $6,007,854 in grants to PROGRESSIVE STATE LEADERS COMMITTEE INC, 6 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PROGRESSIVE STATE LEADERS COMMITTEE INC?
America Votes is the largest funder on record, with $1,000,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PROGRESSIVE STATE LEADERS COMMITTEE INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 20 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing