Alaska · Nonprofit
SACRED VALLEY HEALTH
SACRED VALLEY HEALTH (Alaska) receives grants from 16 organizations whose IRS filings report $306,136 to it, the largest being TOGETHER WOMEN RISE ($84,088). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
SACRED VALLEY HEALTH is better cushioned than half of the 2,211 international nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,211 international nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Anna B Stearns Charitable Foundation Incshared funders
- Health Center Partners of Southern Californiaportfolio match
- US-Mexico Border Philanthropy Partnershipportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
50% of SACRED VALLEY HEALTH’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 5 funders, grant income rose $45k → $58k.
4 of 16 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 10% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of SACRED VALLEY HEALTH’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
SACRED VALLEY HEALTH has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 27% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
50% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SACRED VALLEY HEALTH.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 98% · 2019 66% · 2020 72% · 2021 90% · 2022 56% · 2023 52% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
13% of SACRED VALLEY HEALTH's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 50% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
SACRED VALLEY HEALTH draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Alaska, across 10 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $31k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 16 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Anna B Stearns Charitable Foundation Incshared fundersMA · backs 29 organizations that share your funders
- Health Center Partners of Southern Californiaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- US-Mexico Border Philanthropy Partnershipportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- California Coverage & Health Initiativesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- California Primary Care Associationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Izumi Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Arizona Family Health Partnershipportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Essential Access Healthportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Every Mother Countsportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- One Days Wagesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Ahec Organization Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Amb Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like SACRED VALLEY HEALTH
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Alaska
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
70% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
69%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SACRED VALLEY HEALTH: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds SACRED VALLEY HEALTH?
- SACRED VALLEY HEALTH (Alaska) receives grants from 16 organizations whose IRS filings report $306,136 to it, the largest being TOGETHER WOMEN RISE ($84,088). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does SACRED VALLEY HEALTH have?
- IRS filings report 16 organizations giving $306,136 in grants to SACRED VALLEY HEALTH, 8 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of SACRED VALLEY HEALTH?
- TOGETHER WOMEN RISE is the largest funder on record, with $84,088 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like SACRED VALLEY HEALTH find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Alaska. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 16funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing