Skip to content

Massachusetts · Nonprofit

Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (Massachusetts) receives grants from 18 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,143,692 to it, the largest being FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS ($2,625,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 55% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$906k
Funders on record
18
Grants received
$5.1M
Net assets
$737k
10/18 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Partnership for Policy Integrity does

Mission

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Educating EU policy makers about forest climate and air impacts of burning wood for energy, planning legal actions in UK and EU, educating policymakers and the public about the need to remove incentives for biomass energy in US state and federal policy.

    $823,279 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990. Program spending in total: $823,279.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($466k) Expenses 100 ($582k) Net assets 100 ($355k)2018 Revenue 102 ($477k) Expenses 102 ($591k) Net assets 169 ($601k)2019 Revenue 107 ($497k) Expenses 93 ($542k) Net assets 138 ($491k)2023 Revenue 196 ($912k) Expenses 161 ($936k) Net assets 290 ($1.0M)2024 Revenue 175 ($814k) Expenses 188 ($1.1M) Net assets 230 ($817k)2025 Revenue 195 ($906k) Expenses 170 ($988k) Net assets 207 ($737k)
201720182019202320242025
Revenue (195)Expenses (170)Net assets (207)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $369k to $610k (+65%).

$369k
$610k
$546k
$1.1M
$858k
$782k
201720182019202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2024 8%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

97% of Partnership for Policy Integrity’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,639 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

−$116k
’17
−$114k
’18
−$45k
’19
−$23k
’23
−$280k
’24
−$83k
’25
1.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Mary Booth

Executive Director and Clerk

Board chair

Richard Wiles

Board President

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

201720182019202320242025
Listed111565
Joined····+1+0
No longer listed····01
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 5 funders to 4 funders, grant income rose $237k → $875k.

6 of 18 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 55% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Partnership for Policy Integrity’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Partnership for Policy Integrity leans on a few funders — its largest provides 51% of grant income and the top three 81%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

63% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Partnership for Policy Integrity.

51%
largest funder
81%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 53% · 2018 52% · 2019 34% · 2020 38% · 2021 57% · 2022 60% · 2023 69% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

31% of Partnership for Policy Integrity's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 56% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

55% of Partnership for Policy Integrity's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $2.3M that is directly attributable, 97% of it comes from funders outside Massachusetts, across 5 states.

NY
MA
OR
NJ
CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Massachusetts out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $2.8M arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Partnership for Policy Integrity's revenue grew 95% between 2017 and 2025.

Operating margin−9% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve1.3mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)9% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,606 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like Partnership for Policy Integrity

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Massachusetts

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 12%Fundraising 4%

Governance

4
board members
75%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

69%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Partnership for Policy Integrity: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Partnership for Policy Integrity?
Partnership for Policy Integrity (Massachusetts) receives grants from 18 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,143,692 to it, the largest being FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS ($2,625,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 55% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Partnership for Policy Integrity have?
IRS filings report 18 organizations giving $5,143,692 in grants to Partnership for Policy Integrity, 10 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Partnership for Policy Integrity?
FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS is the largest funder on record, with $2,625,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Partnership for Policy Integrity find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Massachusetts. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Partnership for Policy Integrity →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 18 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing