How much did Price Chopper's Golub Foundation grant in FY2025?

Philanthropy$821kHealth$758kHuman Services$552kArts & Culture$413kFood & Nutrition$380kEducation$297kYouth Development$207kHousing & Shelter$117kOther$0

02FY2025 · 277 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k273 grants · $389k
$10k–50k4 grants · $55k

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

$347k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF NENY	$25,000
THE FOUNDATION OF CVPH	$10,000
CHAMPLAIN VLY OFC OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY	$10,000
DOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS	$10,000
YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION	$7,500
YMCA OF GLENS FALLS	$6,250
CNY RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES INC	$6,250
WILTON WILDLIFE PRESERVE & PARK	$6,250
CAROL M BALDWIN RESEARCH FUND	$6,250
GLENS FALLS AREA YOUTH CENTER	$6,250
THE UPSTATE FOUNDATION INC	$5,000
REVERE AND SON HERITAGE TRUST CORPORATION	$5,000
NONPROFIT CENTER OF THE BERKSHIRES	$5,000
COLONIE SENIOR SERVICE CENTERS	$5,000
WORCESTER REGIONAL STRATEGIC OPPORT	$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $335k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.4M · 685 repeat orgs$844k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

685 repeat relationships — 204 still active in FY2025, 481 since wound down; 72 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

685

836

Total granted

$3.4M

$723k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%

+21%

Still filing today

68%

41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $121k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RF
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC
6× · 2018–2023 · $105k · revenue +588%
EH
ELLIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC THE FOUNDATION FOR ELLIS MEDICINE
3× · 2022–2024 · $75k · revenue +38%
GI
GIRLS INC OF THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION
5× · 2019–2024 · $41k · revenue +46%

Funded once

SP
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +13%
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -40%
TS
THE SALVATION ARMY
one grant, 2020 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Unity House of Cayuga County Inc

Unity house's mission is to empower and enrich the lives of people in recovery, coping with a mental illness, and/or diagnosed with a developmental disability. this is accomplished by offering supports and services in an inclusive,…

Health

Central New York Quest Inc

Central ny quest has been established to serve the needs of persons with intellectual, developmental and mental health disorders in the central new york region.

Human Services

Saratoga Arts Inc

Saratoga arts was established to enrich the region by cultivating a vibrant arts community and by ensuring that the arts are accessible to all.

Arts & Culture

Adirondack Mountain Club Inc

Adk is the only non-profit organization in new york state dedicated to the conservation, preservation, and responsible recreational use of the new york state forest preserve and other parks, wild lands, and waters vital to our members and…

Environment

Catskill Public Library

A public library with locations in catskill and palenville, new york providing reference materials and various on-line services.

—

Cattaraugus Rehabilitation Center Inc

The corporation was formed to operate various programs to assist in the development of the mentally and physically disabled. we assist the people we serve through a continuum of service that fosters community participation and personal…

Human Services

Seneca Health Services Inc

To be the leading provider of behavioral and physical healthcare through compassionate and quality services in our community.

—

Accesscny Inc

Accesscny offers personcentered services that empower individuals of all ages and abilities to reach their full potential as part of our shared community. services are provided with dedication, compassion, innovation, and commitment. the…

Health

The History Center in Tompkins County Inc

The History Center in Tompkins County, Inc. is a non-profit organization whose purpose is to preserve and encourage access to its unique collections, while designing learning experiences and services that create opportunities for people to…

—

Oswego Health Inc

The mission of Oswego Health, Inc. is to provide accessible quality care and improve the health of residents in our community.

Health

Behavioral Health Services North Inc

The organization provides behavioral health / social support services to residents in clinton, franklin, essex, warren and washington counties in new york state.

Health

The Children's Ctr At Suny Morrisville State College Inc

The center's mission is to provide quality childcare services to the morrisville state college campus and the local community in a safe and nurturing environment which promotes the social, emotional, physical, language and cognitive…

Unclassified

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family and Child Service of Schenectady and the most unlike its peers is The Boundless Books Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%24/1,003

the rest of the field

10%

11,842/119,757

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

909 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 909 of the 1,599 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

290

Early backer (in before they grew)

854/909

Grantees still filing

641/909

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,644,448Food & Nutrition$253,000Health$241,100Human Services$230,139Arts & Culture$169,200Education$144,366Philanthropy$101,350

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region IncNY159.5× affinity162 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · William Gundry Broughton Charitable Private Foundation Inc · Review Foundation · Pioneer Bank Charitable Foundation · United Way of the Greater Capital Region · Charles R Wood Foundation · Capital District Physicians' Health Plan Inc · Neil Jane William Estelle Golub Family Foundation Inc · The Troy Savings Bank Charitable Fo · Kinney Drugs Foundation Inc · Cloudsplitter Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Price Chopper's Golub Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

13get no government money at all

80report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

5rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Price Chopper's Golub Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Price Chopper's Golub Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home