· Public charity
Capital District Physicians' Health Plan Inc
Cdphp provides quality health care at a reasonable cost for cdphp members and operates as a model for the delivery, financing, and administration of health care services.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of CAPITAL DISTRICT PHYSICIANS' HEALTH PLAN INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 1 grants below total $60,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $89,715 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $29,715 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMFORT FOOD COMMUNITY | $60,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCDPHP FOUNDATION INC7× · 2018–2024 · $1.1M · revenue -52% · 59% of their budget
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute2× · 2018–2020 · $542k · revenue +25%- CFCOMFORT FOOD COMMUNITY5× · 2020–2024 · $362k
Funded once
- VNVISITING NURSE SERVICES ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2020 · $864k
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ALBANYone grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue -2%
- COCARES OF NY INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue +122%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.
To promote and enhance the quality and accessibility of health care and support at home.
We, st. joseph's medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph's medical is a member of st. joseph's health and trinity health.
To be the leading provider of behavioral and physical healthcare through compassionate and quality services in our community.
Unity house's mission is to empower and enrich the lives of people in recovery, coping with a mental illness, and/or diagnosed with a developmental disability. this is accomplished by offering supports and services in an inclusive,…
For the regions we serve. nascentia community care's goal of maintaining, restoring and promoting the health and independence of those we serve is achieved by utilizing our agency and community resources, by working collaboratively, and by…
Community health action of staten island' drives dramatic improvements in the health of new yorkers.
Leadingage new york represents not-for-profit, mission-driven and public continuing care providers, including nursing homes, senior housing, adult care facilities, continuing care retirement communities, assisted living and community…
The organization's mission is to sustain a vibrant, healthy and strong community through affordable, culturally competent, quality primary health care.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
Jewish home of central new york senior apartment's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. jewish home of central new york senior…
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Addictions Care Center of Albany Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mary McClellan Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
181 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 181 of the 219 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CDPHP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ALBANY ↗
- Who funds CARES OF NY INC ↗
- Who funds ALBANY COUNTY OPPORTUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds ST PETER'S HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds TERESIAN HOUSE NURSING HOME CO INC ↗
- Who funds CITY MISSION OF SCHENECTADY ↗
- Who funds ALBANY POLICE AND FIRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ELLIS HOSPITAL D/B/A ELLIS MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds CANTON-POTSDAM HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds COMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY FOR THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds THE SARATOGA HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds NORTH COUNTRY TRANSITIONAL LIVING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SCHENECTADY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds GLENS FALLS HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds SCHENECTADY INNER CITY MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PLANNING COUNCIL OF JEFFERSON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ST LAWRENCE COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL ROOTS INC ↗
- Who funds CHAMPLAIN VALLEY PHYSICIANS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE FATHER PETER G YOUNG JR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SCHOHARIE COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF THE CAPITAL REGION INC ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF COLUMBIA & GREENE COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds BETHESDA HOUSE OF SCHENECTADY INC ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN SCHENECTADY IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HEALTHALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR DISABILITY SERVICESINC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · United Way of the Greater Capital Region · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Pioneer Bank Charitable Foundation · Mvp Health Plan Inc · Review Foundation · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Capital Communications Cares Foundation · Sunmark Charitable Community Foundation · Gideon Lodge #140 B'Nai B'Rith Housing Foundation Inc · William Gundry Broughton Charitable Private Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Capital District Physicians' Health Plan Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.