Skip to content

New York · Nonprofit

ROSE GARDEN RESTORATION COMMITTEE

ROSE GARDEN RESTORATION COMMITTEE (New York) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $496,984 to it, the largest being THE CARLILIAN FOUNDATION ($493,359). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$136k
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$497k
Net assets
$867k
4/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 89%
01What it does

What Rose Garden Restoration Committee does

Mission

The Rose Garden Restoration Committee, through the work of dedicated volunteers, strives to restore and improve the rose garden located in schenectady's central park through coordinated work maintenance projects and fundraising so that the garden will be an asset and benefit to be enjoyed by the residents of the city of schenectady and to others who may come to visit garden.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. In 2025 the Rose Garden Restoration Committee continued to maintain, restore, and improve the rose garden located in schenectady's central park.

    $109,366 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990. Program spending in total: $109,366.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($109k) Expenses 100 ($84k) Net assets 100 ($645k)2018 Revenue 189 ($205k) Expenses 102 ($85k) Net assets 119 ($766k)2019 Revenue 187 ($204k) Expenses 121 ($101k) Net assets 135 ($868k)2020 Revenue 133 ($144k) Expenses 144 ($121k) Net assets 138 ($892k)2021 Revenue 116 ($126k) Expenses 146 ($123k) Net assets 139 ($896k)2022 Revenue 88 ($96k) Expenses 149 ($124k) Net assets 134 ($868k)2023 Revenue 103 ($112k) Expenses 145 ($121k) Net assets 133 ($858k)2024 Revenue 102 ($111k) Expenses 137 ($115k) Net assets 132 ($854k)2025 Revenue 125 ($136k) Expenses 146 ($122k) Net assets 134 ($867k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (125)Expenses (146)Net assets (134)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $645k to $766k (+19%).

$645k
$766k
$869k
$892k
$897k
$868k
$858k
$854k
$868k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

90% of ROSE GARDEN RESTORATION COMMITTEE’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,629 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$25k
’17
$120k
’18
$102k
’19
$24k
’20
$4k
’21
−$28k
’22
−$10k
’23
−$4k
’24
$14k
’25
50
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed9101091010988
Joined·+2+1+0+1+1+0+2+0
No longer listed·11101130
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $750 → $100k.

From the IRS filings of ROSE GARDEN RESTORATION COMMITTEE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ROSE GARDEN RESTORATION COMMITTEE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 99% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

99%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 71% · 2019 71% · 2020 99% · 2021 99% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of ROSE GARDEN RESTORATION COMMITTEE's grant income comes from New York funders.

NY
CT

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
New York out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

ROSE GARDEN RESTORATION COMMITTEE holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 2,433 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin10% · below the median
Months of reserve50.1mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)3% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,433 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like ROSE GARDEN RESTORATION COMMITTEE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New York

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

90% of spending goes to programs.

Program 90%Management 10%Fundraising 0%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

90%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

NY

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ROSE GARDEN RESTORATION COMMITTEE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ROSE GARDEN RESTORATION COMMITTEE?
ROSE GARDEN RESTORATION COMMITTEE (New York) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $496,984 to it, the largest being THE CARLILIAN FOUNDATION ($493,359). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does ROSE GARDEN RESTORATION COMMITTEE have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $496,984 in grants to ROSE GARDEN RESTORATION COMMITTEE, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ROSE GARDEN RESTORATION COMMITTEE?
THE CARLILIAN FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $493,359 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ROSE GARDEN RESTORATION COMMITTEE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Rose Garden Restoration Committee →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing