Skip to content

New York · Nonprofit

WORKING GROUP ON GIRLS OF SCHENECTADY INC

WORKING GROUP ON GIRLS OF SCHENECTADY INC (New York) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $130,674 to it, the largest being William Gundry Broughton Charitable Private Foundation Inc ($45,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$26k
Funders on record
9
Grants received
$131k
Net assets
$85
5/9 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Working Group on Girls of Schenectady Inc does

Mission

The Working Group on Girls of Schenectady, Inc. has been formed to facilitate theeducational opportunities and community projects to promote the scholastic and social development of girls in the County of Schenectady, NY, and to educate the community about the needs, challenges, opportunities and successes of girls in the County of Schenectady, NY.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Programs

  1. Girls Day Out a program held in May in which 150 seventh grade girls from SCSD are invited to attend an off campus program where the girls attend a series of workshops to provide the foundation on the themes of building self-esteem, exploring options, and expanding their vision of their future.

  2. Girls Circles provide follow-up to Girls Day Out and expand on the themes of building self-esteem, exploring options, and expanding their vision of their future. Girls (7th grade through high school) who participated in GDO are invited to join a Circle of 8-10 girls that meets in their school during lunch or after school, weekly or every other week. Women from the community volunteer to be Muses to be trained, to co-lead the Circles.

    $665 spent
    2% of program spending
  3. FRESH (Food, Resiliency, Education, Socialization & Heath) Program - available to girls in elementary, middle and high school with several components including mentoring, leadership, gardening, farm-to-table, health and wellness, entrepreneurship, social-emotional learning and community service. Teaching these sustainable life skills to young women will provide numerous benefits and was extremely successful in its pilot year.

    $2,083 spent
    5% of program spending
  4. Other Program Expense, including Program Coordinator salary and various activities in support of Schenectady girls.

    $41,523 spent
    94% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $44,271.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($39k) Expenses 100 ($56k) Net assets 100 ($45k)2018 Revenue 127 ($49k) Expenses 99 ($55k) Net assets 86 ($38k)2019 Revenue 153 ($59k) Expenses 99 ($56k) Net assets 93 ($42k)2020 Revenue 121 ($47k) Expenses 106 ($59k) Net assets 66 ($29k)2021 Revenue 142 ($55k) Expenses 128 ($72k) Net assets 27 ($12k)2022 Revenue 383 ($148k) Expenses 229 ($128k) Net assets 71 ($32k)2023 Revenue 250 ($96k) Expenses 172 ($96k) Net assets 72 ($32k)2024 Revenue 138 ($53k) Expenses 112 ($63k) Net assets 50 ($22k)2025 Revenue 68 ($26k) Expenses 87 ($48k) Net assets 0 ($85)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (68)Expenses (87)Net assets (0)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $22k to $285 (−99%).

$45k
$38k
$42k
$29k
$12k
$32k
$32k
$22k
$285
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of WORKING GROUP ON GIRLS OF SCHENECTADY INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (99% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 6,261 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$17k
’17
−$6k
’18
$3k
’19
−$12k
’20
−$17k
’21
$20k
’22
$245
’23
−$10k
’24
−$22k
’25
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income fell $45k → $34k.

1 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WORKING GROUP ON GIRLS OF SCHENECTADY INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WORKING GROUP ON GIRLS OF SCHENECTADY INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 34% of grant income and the top three 80%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

44% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WORKING GROUP ON GIRLS OF SCHENECTADY INC.

34%
largest funder
80%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 56% · 2018 100% · 2019 48% · 2020 99% · 2021 72% · 2022 100% · 2023 73% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

17% of WORKING GROUP ON GIRLS OF SCHENECTADY INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 56% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

81% of WORKING GROUP ON GIRLS OF SCHENECTADY INC's grant income comes from New York funders.

MN
NY
CT
DE

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’23
New York out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $186 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

WORKING GROUP ON GIRLS OF SCHENECTADY INC's revenue fell 32% between 2017 and 2025.

Operating margin−85% · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−5% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,200 youth development nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Organizations like WORKING GROUP ON GIRLS OF SCHENECTADY INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New York

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

NY

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WORKING GROUP ON GIRLS OF SCHENECTADY INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WORKING GROUP ON GIRLS OF SCHENECTADY INC?
WORKING GROUP ON GIRLS OF SCHENECTADY INC (New York) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $130,674 to it, the largest being William Gundry Broughton Charitable Private Foundation Inc ($45,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WORKING GROUP ON GIRLS OF SCHENECTADY INC have?
IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $130,674 in grants to WORKING GROUP ON GIRLS OF SCHENECTADY INC, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WORKING GROUP ON GIRLS OF SCHENECTADY INC?
William Gundry Broughton Charitable Private Foundation Inc is the largest funder on record, with $45,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WORKING GROUP ON GIRLS OF SCHENECTADY INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Working Group on Girls of Schenectady →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 9 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing