Skip to content

New York · Nonprofit

HISTORIC CHERRY HILL

HISTORIC CHERRY HILL (New York) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $215,611 to it, the largest being THE BENDER FAMILY FOUNDATION ($35,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$282k
Funders on record
15
Grants received
$216k
Net assets
$182k
10/15 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 17%
01What it does

What Historic Cherry Hill does

Mission

Preservation, research & educational programs of historic nature centered around a prominent albany family over generations. Property preservation includes real estate as well as personal property (collections).

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Curatorial and collection care costs are incurred to conserve, preserve and protect the thousands of notable historic documents and objects that are part of the cherry hill collection. These items are preserved for exhibition to the public as well as used in historical research. The organization owns a separate structure that was designed and constructed specifically for the cherry hill collection that houses its curatorial and collection activities and is made available to visiting research professionals.

    $53,048 spent
    22% of program spending
  2. Educational programs are designed to provide tours, exhibit media and publications to the general public regarding the historical significance of local life over more than 250 years. The organization also provides tours and demonstrations to school groups, educators and scholars. School groups from within the city of albany are provided these programs without charge. Other school groups are provided tours at a reduced cost. A significant number of volunteers are trained to provide tours of the historic property and provide information regarding the collection items on exhibition. For 2024, approximately 5,000 people were served through the various educational programs (both on-site and virtual)offered by cherry hill.

    $136,298 spent
    57% of program spending
  3. Property care is maintaining the original building and grounds that are the original cherry hill estate. The property is on the national register of historic places and dates back to the 18th century. The historic home is maintained in period condition with ongoing interior and exterior restoration projects. Beginning in 2009, the organization, with the assistance of federal and state funding, has begun a major historical renovation of the property that is expected to be completed over a number of years. These projects remain ongoing.

    $28,944 spent
    12% of program spending
  4. The organization provides information to the general public, research scholars, schools and other institutions through various media as to the significance of cherry hill. Media is on a national, regional and local level (including the use of the internet). The organization also promotes local history through sponsoring local events either independently or with other historical associations.

    $21,692 spent
    9% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $239,982.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($157k) Expenses 100 ($186k) Net assets 100 ($177k)2018 Revenue 102 ($161k) Expenses 90 ($168k) Net assets 96 ($170k)2019 Revenue 81 ($127k) Expenses 93 ($173k) Net assets 70 ($123k)2020 Revenue 105 ($164k) Expenses 174 ($323k) Net assets -20 ($-35312)2021 Revenue 405 ($634k) Expenses 256 ($475k) Net assets 70 ($124k)2022 Revenue 257 ($402k) Expenses 150 ($279k) Net assets 139 ($247k)2023 Revenue 184 ($288k) Expenses 173 ($321k) Net assets 121 ($215k)2024 Revenue 180 ($282k) Expenses 169 ($315k) Net assets 103 ($182k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (180)Expenses (169)Net assets (103)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $305k to $378k (+24%).

$363k
$347k
$325k
$340k
$305k
$378k
$317k
$275k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 18% · 2018 0% · 2019 1% · 2020 30% · 2021 61% · 2022 64% · 2023 75% · 2024 57%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

88% of HISTORIC CHERRY HILL’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (64% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 19,547 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$29k
’17
−$7k
’18
−$47k
’19
−$159k
’20
$159k
’21
$123k
’22
−$32k
’23
−$32k
’24
2.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Deborah Emmons-Andarawis

Exec director

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2017 and FY2018 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed111013998810
Joined·+1+6+0+0+0+0+2
No longer listed·2340100
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 4 funders, grant income rose $8k → $18k.

3 of 15 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 11% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of HISTORIC CHERRY HILL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

HISTORIC CHERRY HILL has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 16% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

40% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund HISTORIC CHERRY HILL.

16%
largest funder
44%
top three
~9
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 97% · 2018 70% · 2019 48% · 2020 48% · 2021 31% · 2022 39% · 2023 43% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of HISTORIC CHERRY HILL's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 67% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

79% of HISTORIC CHERRY HILL's grant income comes from New York funders.

NY
CT
RI
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
New York out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $23k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

HISTORIC CHERRY HILL has grown faster than half of the 17,936 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−11% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve2.4mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)9% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 17,936 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Government funding HISTORIC CHERRY HILL receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $383k on record.

Federal$383k
grants $383kcontracts $0
20
21
22
23
24
Top agencies
  • Institute of Museum and Library Services$244k
  • National Endowment for the Humanities$128k
  • National Endowment for the Arts$10k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like HISTORIC CHERRY HILL

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New York

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

76% of spending goes to programs.

Program 76%Management 23%Fundraising 1%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

93%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for HISTORIC CHERRY HILL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds HISTORIC CHERRY HILL?
HISTORIC CHERRY HILL (New York) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $215,611 to it, the largest being THE BENDER FAMILY FOUNDATION ($35,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does HISTORIC CHERRY HILL have?
IRS filings report 15 organizations giving $215,611 in grants to HISTORIC CHERRY HILL, 10 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of HISTORIC CHERRY HILL?
THE BENDER FAMILY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $35,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like HISTORIC CHERRY HILL find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Historic Cherry Hill →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 15 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing