Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

New York · Nonprofit

HISTORIC CHERRY HILL

HISTORIC CHERRY HILL (New York) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $215,611 to it, the largest being THE BENDER FAMILY FOUNDATION ($35,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$282k
Revenue FY2024
15
Funders on record
$216k
Grants received
$182k
Net assets
10/15 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 17%

Against its field

HISTORIC CHERRY HILL has grown faster than half of the 17,904 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−11% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve2.4mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)9% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 17,904 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($157k) Expenses 100 ($186k) Net assets 100 ($177k)2018 Revenue 102 ($161k) Expenses 90 ($168k) Net assets 96 ($170k)2019 Revenue 81 ($127k) Expenses 93 ($173k) Net assets 70 ($123k)2020 Revenue 105 ($164k) Expenses 174 ($323k) Net assets -20 ($-35312)2021 Revenue 405 ($634k) Expenses 256 ($475k) Net assets 70 ($124k)2022 Revenue 257 ($402k) Expenses 150 ($279k) Net assets 139 ($247k)2023 Revenue 184 ($288k) Expenses 173 ($321k) Net assets 121 ($215k)2024 Revenue 180 ($282k) Expenses 169 ($315k) Net assets 103 ($182k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (180)Expenses (169)Net assets (103)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 18% · 2018 0% · 2019 1% · 2020 30% · 2021 61% · 2022 64% · 2023 75% · 2024 57%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

88% of HISTORIC CHERRY HILL’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (64% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 19,459 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$29k
17
$7k
18
$47k
19
$159k
20
$159k
21
$123k
22
$32k
23
$32k
24
2.4
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 4 funders, grant income rose $8k → $18k.

3 of 15 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)11% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of HISTORIC CHERRY HILL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

HISTORIC CHERRY HILL has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 16% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

40% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund HISTORIC CHERRY HILL.

16%
largest funder
44%
top three
~9
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 97% · 2018 70% · 2019 48% · 2020 48% · 2021 31% · 2022 39% · 2023 43%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of HISTORIC CHERRY HILL's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 67% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

79% of HISTORIC CHERRY HILL's grant income comes from New York funders.

NY
CT
RI
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
New York out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $23k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 15 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding HISTORIC CHERRY HILL receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $383k on record.

Federal$383k
grants $383kcontracts $0
20
21
22
23
24
Top agencies
  • Institute of Museum and Library Services$244k
  • National Endowment for the Humanities$128k
  • National Endowment for the Arts$10k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like HISTORIC CHERRY HILL

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New York

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

76% of spending goes to programs.

Program 76%Management 23%Fundraising 1%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

93%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for HISTORIC CHERRY HILL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds HISTORIC CHERRY HILL?
HISTORIC CHERRY HILL (New York) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $215,611 to it, the largest being THE BENDER FAMILY FOUNDATION ($35,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does HISTORIC CHERRY HILL have?
IRS filings report 15 organizations giving $215,611 in grants to HISTORIC CHERRY HILL, 10 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of HISTORIC CHERRY HILL?
THE BENDER FAMILY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $35,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like HISTORIC CHERRY HILL find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 15funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing