How much did GEORGE S AND DOLORES DORE grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 88% of GEORGE S AND DOLORES DORE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

see attachedattached detail

2021

see attachedattached detail

2022

detail availableavailable request

2023

specificallyeducationsalt lakeyouthhealthscholarshipsoutreach

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 400 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k86 grants · $453k
$10k–50k228 grants · $4.7M
$50k–250k64 grants · $5.9M
$250k+22 grants · $16M

$18,000

Median grant

States reached

$745M

Total assets

Largest grants

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH SCIENCES SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$5,575,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS$1,218,750
SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY$1,000,000
UTAH ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYUTAH'S HOGLE ZOO$1,000,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH$660,000
MAX MCGRAW WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$500,000
UTAH'S PROMISE$500,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH SCIENCES SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$500,000
UTAH SYMPHONY UTAH OPERA$500,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY IN UTAH$500,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH ATHLETICS DEPARTMENT$500,000
UTAH SYMPHONY UTAH OPERA$488,490
OGDEN PIONEER DAYS FOUNDATION$400,000
THE ROAD HOME$350,000
BALLET WEST$350,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $3.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 10%. 4% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$44M · 272 repeat orgs$87M to everyone else

272 repeat relationships — 272 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 94 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

272

132

Total granted

$44M

$82M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%

+59%

Still filing today

71%

44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.9M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CF
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF UTAH
2× · 2023–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +156%
OP
OGDEN PIONEER DAYS FOUNDATION
2× · 2023–2024 · $861k · revenue +156%
VO
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH
2× · 2023–2024 · $820k · revenue +94%

Funded once

2C
2022 CONTRIBUTIONS PAID
one grant, 2022 · $30M
2C
2020 CONTRIBUTIONS PAID SEE ATTACHED DETAIL
one grant, 2020 · $18M
2C
2021 CONTRIBUTIONS PAID SEE ATTACHED DETAIL
one grant, 2021 · $17M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Utah Festival Opera Company

Elevating lives through ennobling artistic experiences by creating a nurturing environment that ensures performance excellence, creative experiences, and educational opportunities.

Arts & Culture

Utah Shakespeare Festival Foundation

Arts & Culture

Utah Public Lands Alliance

Education

Utah Valley Arts

Support the arts in utah.

—

Utah Geological Foundation

—

Friends of the Salt Lake City

Friends of the slc public library supports the library by sponsoring periodic used book sales and events to raise funds for library programs and to encourage literacy and learning within the community.

Education

Utah Athletic Foundation

Foster development of winter sports in utah and manage and maintain the utah olympic park, utah olympic oval and soldier hollow nordic center

Recreation & Sports

Utah Museum of Contemporary Art

The utah museum of contemporary art believes in the power of the art of our time. through programming, advocacy, and collaboration, we work with artists and communities to build a better world.

Arts & Culture

Utah Arts Academy

Utah arts academy is a premier academic and arts-focused school. by combining rigorous academic programming with pre-professional training in a wide array of arts (theatre, dance, music, visual and media arts), we inspire our students'…

Education

The Utah Nordic Alliance

Education and charitable purposes of promoting the sport of cross-country skiing and racing in utah through youth and adult education, coaching, facilitation, information, volunteer work and recreational and competitive events. the…

—

Utah Medical Association Foundation

—

Utah Valley Chamber of Commerce

Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Westminster University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/314

the rest of the field

14%

1,294/9,548

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

298 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

134

Early backer (in before they grew)

297/298

Grantees still filing

234/298

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$117,265,473Arts & Culture$4,271,391Human Services$3,775,867Philanthropy$2,258,790Health$1,764,870Education$889,888International$828,910

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT253.9× affinity146 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · Marriner S Eccles Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · McCarthey Family Foundation · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · Intermountain Community Care · Utah Medical Association Foundation · Henry W & Leslie M Eskuche · David Kelby Johnson · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation GEORGE S AND DOLORES DORE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CHAMBER ORCHESTRA OGDEN.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 9.8× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 453541409 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CHAMBER ORCHESTRA OGDEN, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 83% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to George S and Dolores Dore?

Find your warmest path to George S and Dolores Dore through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

GEORGE S AND DOLORES DORE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

298 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to George S and Dolores Dore?

More from the funding graph

GEORGE S AND DOLORES DORE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

298 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to George S and Dolores Dore?

More from the funding graph