Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Ihc Health Services Inc

Helping people live the healthiest lives possible.

$11M
Granted FY2024still arriving
142
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$6.5M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$591MPhilanthropy$6.7MHousing & Shelter$4.6MEducation$3.1MArts & Culture$2.1MHuman Services$2.1MCrime & Legal$1.2MFood & Nutrition$1.1MOther$0
02FY2024 · 142 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 142 grants below total $11,140,701 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $11,408,865 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $268,164 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k42 grants · $260k
  • $10k–50k80 grants · $1.5M
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+4 grants · $8.1M
$12,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$18.7B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC$6,548,883
WYANDOTTE HEALTH FOUNDATION$900,000
ONE UTAH HEALTH COLLABORATIVE INC$350,000
ASSOCIATION FOR UTAH COMMUNITY HEALTH$290,000
UTAH HERITAGE AND ARTS FOUNDATION INC$230,000
UNITED WAY OF SALT LAKE$120,300
UTAH FOOD BANK$113,620
UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN UTAH$105,946
WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY$92,900
MAYOR'S FUND FOR LAS VEGAS LIFE$80,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$76,167
TREEUTAH$70,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE INTERMOUNTAIN AREA INC$62,928
LATINO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES$56,896
ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC$55,782
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $14.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WESTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $30k → 12%ACTION INC: $20k → 16%CANYON CREEK WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER: $24k → 13%UTAH COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION INC: $25k → 6%NEW HORIZONS CRISIS CENTER INC: $19k → 10%UTAH COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION INC: $20k → 6%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $29k → 14%SEEKHAVEN FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $19k → 11%FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER AND EDUCATION SERVICES INC: $25k → 8%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $26k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $25k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $12k → 14%FAMILY INSTITUTE OF NORTHERN UTAH: $146k → 12%FAMILY INSTITUTE OF NORTHERN UTAH: $146k → 12%FAMILY INSTITUTE OF NORTHERN UTAH: $96k → 12%FAMILY INSTITUTE OF NORTHERN UTAH: $85k → 12%FRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT INC: $500k → 10%FRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT INC: $500k → 10%FAMILY INSTITUTE OF NORTHERN UTAH: $50k → 12%DAVIS CITIZENS COALITION AGAINST VIOLENCE: $19k → 6%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $19k → 9%ST JUDE'S RANCH FOR CHILDREN INC: $25k → 13%FRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT INC: $40k → 10%THE ROAD HOME: $603k → 6%FRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT INC: $31k → 10%THE ROAD HOME: $33k → 6%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $25k → 13%FRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT INC: $20k → 10%TABITHAS WAY: $15k → 8%RED ROCK CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE: $15k → 10%CIVICA FOUNDATION INC: $10.0M → 8%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE OF NORTHERN UTAH INC: $76k → 9%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE OF NORTHERN UTAH INC: $75k → 9%HOLBROOK COMMUNITY CENTER: $100k → 8%SENIOR CHARITY CARE FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%LATINO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES: $150k → 8%LATINO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES: $85k → 8%LATINO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES: $82k → 8%LATINO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES: $75k → 8%LATINO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES: $57k → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $385k → 8%THE UTAH REFUGEE CONNECTION: $25k → 8%ENCIRCLE: $50k → 8%SOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC: $33k → 8%SOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC: $15k → 8%ASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH: $75k → 8%ASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH: $40k → 8%ASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH: $25k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MT
IL
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
MD
KS
NC
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$561M · 171 repeat orgs$49M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

171 repeat relationships — 85 still active in FY2024, 86 since wound down; 54 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

171
139

Total granted

$561M
$47M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+17%

Still filing today

79%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    INTERMOUNTAIN COMMUNITY CARE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $397M · revenue +91% · 93% of their budget
  • IH
    INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $44M · revenue +34%
  • UH
    UTAH HEALTH POLICY PROJECT
    7× · 2017–2024 · $3.2M · revenue +119% · 69% of their budget

Funded once

  • HC
    HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $25M · revenue -62%
  • CF
    CIVICA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10M · revenue -58% · 36% of their budget
  • TO
    THE ORRIN G HATCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $2.0M · revenue -81% · 36% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Valley Chamber of Commerce

Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.

—
2
Utah Geological Foundation
—
3
The Center for Economic Opportunity and Belonging

Our mission is to engage with communities and catalyze private, public, and philanthropic partnerships to remedy opportunity gaps in economic opportunity, education, health, and housing in Utah.

Community Improvement
4
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
5
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
6
Utah Humanities Council

Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…

Arts & Culture
7
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment
8
Utah Donor Collaborative

Democracy Means Equality, Freedom & Justice: It means having a representative government. UDC is here to transform Utah politics and ensure that every voice counts.

—
9
Northern Utah Cancer Foundation
—
10
Utah Medical Association

The Utah Medical Association is a professional resource for member physicians providing educational opportunities and dissemination of medical knowledge and practices.

—
11
Utah Safety Council

The mission of the Utah Safety Council is to save lives by promoting safety and health through education, services, and products.

Public Safety & Disaster
12
University Hospital Foundation

Fundraising for healthcare to support patient care, medical education, and clinical research for University of Utah Hospitals & Clinics and other similar nonprofit organizations.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Treasure Valley Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Foundry Food Hub. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyDomestic Violence ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Lgbtq+ Community SupportImmigrant Worker SupportFaith-Based Social ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsYouth Development CentersSchool District FoundationsJewish Community Organizati…Senior Support ServicesPublic Library OperationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Cancer Support ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Animal Rescue and ShelterYmca Youth DevelopmentCommunity Food PantriesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Local Food System Organizat…Developmental Disabilities …Community College Foundatio…Food Banks and PantriesAddiction Recovery ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Affordable Housing Developm…United Way AffiliatesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number29%3%<5yr17%10%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr15%26%20–35yr8%26%35–55yr12%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value29%0%<5yr17%2%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr15%6%20–35yr8%71%35–55yr12%11%55yr+

The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%5/364
the rest of the field
15%
1,821/12,039

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

303 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 303 of the 372 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

27
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
72
Early backer (in before they grew)
296/303
Grantees still filing
192/303
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INTERMOUNTAIN COMMUNITY CARE FOUNDATION INC — $397,000,000 · HealthINTERMOUNTAIN COMMUNITY CARE FOUNDATION INCINTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $44,224,538 · HealthINTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INCHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION — $25,003,000 · Health+49 more — $18,091,614 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF UTAH — $53,043,646 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF U…STATE OF UTAH — $3,075,096 · OtherWEBER STATE UNIVERSITY — $2,856,267 · Other+95 more — $25,215,415 · Other+95 moreUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN UTAH — $12,646,516 · PhilanthropyUTAH'S PROMISE — $6,381,800 · PhilanthropyThe Community Foundation of Utah — $2,549,500 · Philanthropy+8 more — $962,158 · PhilanthropyCIVICA FOUNDATION — $10,000,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT INC — $1,090,884 · Human ServicesTHE ROAD HOME — $647,132 · Human ServicesFamily Institute of Northern Utah — $528,000 · Human ServicesUtah Pride Center Inc — $492,952 · Human Services+16 more — $1,720,112 · Human ServicesWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY — $610,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $380,000 · EducationCOLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $300,000 · EducationDavis Technical College Foundation Inc — $262,300 · EducationUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $203,500 · EducationLATINOS IN ACTION INC — $182,925 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION — $164,000 · EducationUniversity of Idaho Foundation Inc — $100,000 · Education+3 more — $125,000 · EducationTHE ORRIN G HATCH FOUNDATION — $2,020,000 · Arts & CultureUTAH HERITAGE AND ARTS FOUNDATION INC — $230,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $27,500 · Arts & CultureUTAH CLEAN AIR PARTNERSHIP INC — $845,000 · EnvironmentTREE UTAH — $400,000 · EnvironmentBREATHE UTAH — $70,000 · EnvironmentTHE GREEN URBAN LUNCH BOX — $66,250 · Environment
Health$484,319,152Other$84,190,424Philanthropy$22,539,974Human Services$14,479,080Education$2,327,725Arts & Culture$2,277,500Environment$1,381,250

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINTERMOUNTAIN COMMUNITY CARE FOUNDATION INC — $397,000,000 over 5y, 93% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $44,224,538 over 8y, 9.1% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION — $25,003,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN UTAH — $12,646,516 over 5y, 79% of budgetCIVICA FOUNDATION — $10,000,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetUTAH'S PROMISE — $6,381,800 over 8y, 39% of budgetUTAH HEALTH POLICY PROJECT — $3,235,460 over 7y, 69% of budgetAssociation for Utah Community Health — $3,190,000 over 7y, 14% of budgetSHELTER THE HOMELESS INC — $2,767,653 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetThe Community Foundation of Utah — $2,549,500 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetTHE ORRIN G HATCH FOUNDATION — $2,020,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetTHE ADVERTISING COUNCIL INC — $2,000,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH — $1,174,262 over 6y, 21% of budgetUTAH DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ADVISORY COUNCIL — $1,122,664 over 5y, 28% of budgetFRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT INC — $1,090,884 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetWYANDOTTE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $900,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetHEALTHCARE ANCHOR NETWORK INC — $874,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetMOAB FREE HEALTH CLINIC — $852,000 over 3y, 52% of budgetONE UTAH HEALTH COLLABORATIVE — $850,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetUTAH CLEAN AIR PARTNERSHIP INC — $845,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetYOUTH FUTURES — $821,012 over 4y, 17% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $786,070 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME — $647,132 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetUTAH NON-PROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION — $630,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY — $610,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFamily Institute of Northern Utah — $528,000 over 6y, 42% of budgetUtah Support Advocates for Recovery Awareness — $526,032 over 4y, 14% of budgetUrban Indian Center of Salt Lake — $515,640 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $513,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSAFE NEST FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS INC — $500,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUtah Pride Center Inc — $492,952 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH ENDOWMENT — $469,200 over 1y, 71% of budgetLATINO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES — $448,712 over 5y, 49% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK — $434,321 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTREE UTAH — $400,000 over 5y, 24% of budgetFamily Health Services Corporation — $397,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTexas Hospital Association Foundation — $395,606 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetTHE INN BETWEEN — $392,168 over 2y, 33% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $380,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMidtown Community Health Center Inc — $362,600 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetImpact Mental Health — $357,573 over 5y, 28% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc — $335,412 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetSOUTHWEST UTAH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $330,950 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetHealth Research and Educational Trust — $308,740 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCOLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetEnvision Utah — $291,800 over 5y, 14% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - UTAH — $278,140 over 5y, 9.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERMOUNTAIN COMMUNITY CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN UTAH ↗
  • Who funds CIVICA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UTAH'S PROMISE ↗
  • Who funds UTAH HEALTH POLICY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Association for Utah Community Health ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Community Foundation of Utah ↗
  • Who funds THE ORRIN G HATCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ADVERTISING COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH ↗
  • Who funds UTAH DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ADVISORY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT INC ↗
  • Who funds WYANDOTTE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHCARE ANCHOR NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MOAB FREE HEALTH CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds ONE UTAH HEALTH COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds UTAH CLEAN AIR PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH FUTURES ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ROAD HOME ↗
  • Who funds UTAH NON-PROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Family Institute of Northern Utah ↗
  • Who funds Utah Support Advocates for Recovery Awareness ↗
  • Who funds Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George S and Dolores …Sorenson Legacy Found…Intermountain Communi…Larry H Miller and Ga…The Community Foundat…Utah's PromiseLawrence & Janet Dee …Utah Medical Associat…Pacificorp Foundation…Kennecott Utah Copper…C Scott & Dorothy E W…McCarthey Family Foun…
George S and Dolores Dore Eccles FoundationUT147.6× affinity82 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Utah's Promise · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Utah Medical Association Foundation · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · C Scott & Dorothy E Watkins Charitable Foundation · McCarthey Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ihc Health Services Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
71report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 372 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines