Skip to content

Utah · Nonprofit

CITIZENS COMMITTEE TO SAVE OUR

CITIZENS COMMITTEE TO SAVE OUR (Utah) receives grants from 37 organizations whose IRS filings report $865,451 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($178,200). 29 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$568k
Funders on record
37
Grants received
$865k
Net assets
$741k
29/37 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 34%
01What it does

What Citizens Committee to Save Our does

Mission

Dedicated to protecting the beauty and wildness of the wasatch mountains.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Save our canyons worked toward our mission in a variety of ways, but generally all programs fit into policy, advocacy, and stewardship. Soc engaged over 50,000 people through our newsletters and website, social media and organizing several events. We collaborate with and sit on councils with several different governmental agencies to be the voice of for the protection of the wasatch mountains. We led dozens of stewardship projects to give back to this place by cleaning up roadways, partnering on fuels and climate projects, pulling invasive weeds, and maintaining trails. Last, but not least, we lead education programs to introduce urban youth to the natural systems and recreation opportunities in the wasatch. All of this work is to help maintain the wild character, watershed, and dispersed recreation of this heavily used range.

    $297,674 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $297,674.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($399k) Expenses 100 ($420k) Net assets 100 ($685k)2018 Revenue 71 ($285k) Expenses 70 ($294k) Net assets 98 ($673k)2019 Revenue 87 ($347k) Expenses 87 ($367k) Net assets 97 ($661k)2020 Revenue 103 ($411k) Expenses 78 ($327k) Net assets 111 ($758k)2021 Revenue 101 ($404k) Expenses 70 ($295k) Net assets 129 ($883k)2022 Revenue 98 ($392k) Expenses 99 ($417k) Net assets 123 ($843k)2024 Revenue 128 ($512k) Expenses 141 ($594k) Net assets 94 ($644k)2025 Revenue 142 ($568k) Expenses 114 ($478k) Net assets 108 ($741k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'24'25
Revenue (142)Expenses (114)Net assets (108)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $758k to $883k (+16%).

$685k
$673k
$661k
$758k
$883k
$843k
$659k
$757k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 18%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$21k
’17
−$9k
’18
−$20k
’19
$84k
’20
$110k
’21
−$25k
’22
−$82k
’24
$90k
’25
6.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'24'25
Listed121311111091011
Joined·+2+4+1+0+0·+4
No longer listed·16111·3
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 8 funders to 22 funders, grant income rose $41k → $134k.

6 of 37 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 38% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CITIZENS COMMITTEE TO SAVE OUR’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 37 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CITIZENS COMMITTEE TO SAVE OUR has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 21% of grant income, and it takes 6 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 6 funders to its left

48% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CITIZENS COMMITTEE TO SAVE OUR.

21%
largest funder
35%
top three
~13
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 30% · 2018 30% · 2019 18% · 2020 25% · 2021 17% · 2022 26% · 2023 21% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

65% of CITIZENS COMMITTEE TO SAVE OUR's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 78% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

CITIZENS COMMITTEE TO SAVE OUR draws 51% of its grant income from funders outside Utah, across 11 states in all.

WA
IL
NY
CA
UT
CO
DE
NC
DC
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Utah out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $333k arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like CITIZENS COMMITTEE TO SAVE OUR

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Utah

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

62% of spending goes to programs.

Program 62%Management 21%Fundraising 16%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

UT

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CITIZENS COMMITTEE TO SAVE OUR: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CITIZENS COMMITTEE TO SAVE OUR?
CITIZENS COMMITTEE TO SAVE OUR (Utah) receives grants from 37 organizations whose IRS filings report $865,451 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($178,200). 29 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CITIZENS COMMITTEE TO SAVE OUR have?
IRS filings report 37 organizations giving $865,451 in grants to CITIZENS COMMITTEE TO SAVE OUR, 29 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CITIZENS COMMITTEE TO SAVE OUR?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $178,200 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CITIZENS COMMITTEE TO SAVE OUR find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Citizens Committee to Save Our →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 37 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing