Utah · Nonprofit
UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION
UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION (Utah) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $740,647 to it, the largest being UTAH BAR FOUNDATION ($436,449). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2025
- $314k
- Funders on record
- 9
- Grants received
- $741k
- Net assets
- $351k
What Utah Dispute Resolution does
Mission
Utah Dispute Resolution exists to provide residents of Utah with quality mediation services, information and training in dispute resolution, and the means to successfully, informally and cooperatively resolve disputes.
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.
Programs
Domestic mattersudr managed 508 domestic matters cases in ty2024/ fy2025, a reduction of 63 from the prior tax year. Of these cases, 261 resulted in convened mediations. A total of 115, or 44.1%, of these mediations resulted in full agreement. 41 cases, or 15.7%, resulted in partial agreement, and 105, or 40.2%, were not resolved. The a1verage cost to open,manage, mediate ans close a case was $411, up from $311 in the prior tax year.
$208,861 spent73% of program spendingTraining program udr trained 59 participants in 4 public online webinars. Udr also helped 6 indivdiuals to complete mentorship, reslting in additional qualified individuls able to mediate disputes,ths total cost to train participant was $33,422 or $514 per trainee, up from $370 in the prior tax year.
$33,422 spent12% of program spendingAssisted pro se (aps) helps family courts by provide mediation services to low-income families as part of required court appearances. Udr opened 197 aps cases in ty 2024/fy 2025. Up from 148 in fy2024. Udr mediated 159 of cases opened. Fully resolved cases were 80 (55 in the prior year.) 21 cases (19 in the prior year) resulted in partial acceptance and 58 cases (48 in prior year) were not resolved.udr spent $24,980 opening and managing these cases ($19,440 prior year), resulting in an average of $242 per case opened ($131 in prior year.)
$24,982 spent9% of program spendingSmall claims and appeals udr handled 106 small claims and appeals mediations in ty2024/ fy2025. 93% of the cases opened, or 99 cases, were mediated. A total of 18, or 18.2 of these mediations resulted in full agreement, no cases resulted in partial agreement. 81 cases, or 81.8%, were not resolved. The total cost to manage all cases was $10,502. The average case cost $99, down from $118 in the prior tax year.
$10,502 spent4% of program spendingNon-domestic mattersudr managed 27 non-domestic cases involving a wide range of disputes in ty2024/ fy2025. Of these cases, 8 were mediated. A total of 5 cases, 62.5%, were fully resolved. No cases ended in partial agreement. 3 cases, or 37.5% were not resolved. Costs to open, manage and close all non-domestic cases was $7,478. The average case cost $277, up from $206 in the prior year.
$7,478 spent3% of program spending
The 5 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $285,245.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $377k to $458k (+22%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2020 17%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
44% of UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (94% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Chief executive
Karrie Ketchum
Executive director
As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.
The chief executive listed changed between the FY2022 and FY2023 filings.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 7 funders, grant income rose $51k → $180k.
1 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 59% of grant income and the top three 86%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
81% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 43% · 2018 50% · 2019 86% · 2020 56% · 2021 50% · 2022 40% · 2023 58% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
57% of UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 89% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
99% of UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION's grant income comes from Utah funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $198 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 1,547 crime & legal nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,547 crime & legal nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Organizations like UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Utah
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
88% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
95%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION?
- UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION (Utah) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $740,647 to it, the largest being UTAH BAR FOUNDATION ($436,449). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION have?
- IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $740,647 in grants to UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION, 8 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION?
- UTAH BAR FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $436,449 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like UTAH DISPUTE RESOLUTION find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Utah Dispute Resolution →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 9 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing