· Private foundation
Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 41% of PACIFICORP FOUNDATION AKA PACIFIC POWER FOUNDATION AKA ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER FOUNDATI’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 33 grants below total $384,696 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,794,533 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,409,837 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k29 grants · $79k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $275k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| United Way of the Columbia-Willamette | $149,831 |
| United Way of the Columbia-Willamette | $75,565 |
| University of Wyoming Foundation | $50,000 |
| Rod's House | $30,000 |
| Utah State University | $7,500 |
| City of Brigham City | $5,000 |
| Wyoming Rescue Mission | $5,000 |
| Iron County Care and Share | $5,000 |
| Family Support Center of Southwestern Utah | $4,000 |
| Autism After 21 Support Services | $4,000 |
| Kids Intervention and Diagnostic Service Center | $4,000 |
| ABC House Inc | $3,500 |
| The Latino Community Association | $3,000 |
| Wyoming Food for Thought Project | $3,000 |
| Community Outreach Inc | $3,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
134 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 123 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SBSAFETY BLITZ FOUNDATION INC2× · 2020–2022 · $144k · revenue +22%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION3× · 2021–2024 · $121k · revenue +28%
- UFUTAH FOOD BANK3× · 2020–2022 · $110k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF UTAHone grant, 2022 · $60k
- WGWYOMING GOVERNOR'S RESIDENCE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue -3%
OREGON MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRYgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $24k · revenue +57%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.
Our mission is to engage with communities and catalyze private, public, and philanthropic partnerships to remedy opportunity gaps in economic opportunity, education, health, and housing in Utah.
To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…
Utah Arts Academy is a premier academic and arts-focused school. By combining rigorous academic programming with pre-professional training in a wide array of arts (theatre, dance, music, visual and media arts), we inspire our students'…
Making lives better in southwest utah by providing accessible, quality health care, regardless of financial, language, or cultural barriers.
Summit land conservancy works with utah communities to conserve land and water for the benefit of the people and nature.
The Utah State Fair Corporation was established to preserve Utah's heritage, meet tomorrow's future today, and showcase agriculture and innovative technology.
Support various performing arts in utah.
Democracy Means Equality, Freedom & Justice: It means having a representative government. UDC is here to transform Utah politics and ensure that every voice counts.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ycc Family Crisis Center and the most unlike its peers is Ulhaas Bengali Association of Utah. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
414 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 414 of the 672 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds United Way of the Columbia-Willamette ↗
- Who funds UTAH'S PROMISE ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST WYOMING ↗
- Who funds SAFETY BLITZ FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds WYOMING GOVERNOR'S RESIDENCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Wyoming Rescue Mission ↗
- Who funds ROD'S HOUSE ↗
- Who funds OREGON MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY ↗
- Who funds UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND ROSE FESTIVAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WYOMING FOOD FOR THOUGHT PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Junior Achievement of Utah & Idaho ↗
- Who funds TUACAHN CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA ↗
- Who funds Salt Lake Neighborhood Housing Services DBA Neighborworks Salt Lake ↗
- Who funds Salt Lake Community College Foundation ↗
- Who funds BRIDGERLAND COMMUNITY ICE ARENA GEORGE S ECCLES ICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN WEST HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE LIVING PLANET INC ↗
- Who funds ROUNDHOUSE RESTORATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NATRONA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ZIEGFELD THEATER ARTS ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN UTAH ↗
- Who funds The Actors Mission Inc ↗
- Who funds UTAH ARTS FESTIVAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Community Action Services and Food Bank ↗
- Who funds Fort Walla Walla Museum Walla Walla Valley Historical Society ↗
- Who funds WASATCH COMMUNITY GARDENS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Marriner S Eccles Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · The Miner Foundation · Wyoming Community Foundation · McCarthey Family Foundation · Hemingway Foundation · The Autzen Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati?
Find your warmest path to Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.