Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Utah · Nonprofit

UPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCE

UPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCE (Utah) receives grants from 31 organizations whose IRS filings report $925,559 to it, the largest being PETERSEN BRUCE & CECILIA FDN-MAIN ($180,000). 19 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$1.5M
Revenue FY2025
31
Funders on record
$926k
Grants received
$2.9M
Net assets
19/31 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 14%

Against its field

UPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCE holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 5,983 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin1% · below the median
Months of reserve9.2mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)8% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 5,983 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($850k) Expenses 100 ($823k) Net assets 100 ($2.2M)2018 Revenue 110 ($931k) Expenses 109 ($900k) Net assets 102 ($2.3M)2019 Revenue 107 ($905k) Expenses 114 ($939k) Net assets 100 ($2.3M)2020 Revenue 96 ($820k) Expenses 111 ($912k) Net assets 96 ($2.2M)2021 Revenue 121 ($1.0M) Expenses 93 ($765k) Net assets 113 ($2.5M)2022 Revenue 141 ($1.2M) Expenses 116 ($956k) Net assets 121 ($2.7M)2023 Revenue 159 ($1.4M) Expenses 133 ($1.1M) Net assets 131 ($3.0M)2024 Revenue 166 ($1.4M) Expenses 186 ($1.5M) Net assets 129 ($2.9M)2025 Revenue 181 ($1.5M) Expenses 185 ($1.5M) Net assets 130 ($2.9M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (181)Expenses (185)Net assets (130)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

97% of UPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCE’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,740 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$26k
17
$31k
18
$34k
19
$93k
20
$264k
21
$244k
22
$257k
23
$118k
24
$16k
25
9.2
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 7 funders to 15 funders, grant income rose $45k → $160k.

4 of 31 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)8% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of UPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 31 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

UPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 19% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

19%
largest funder
47%
top three
~10
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 34% · 2018 36% · 2019 27% · 2020 42% · 2021 20% · 2022 25% · 2023 31%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

79% of UPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 61% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

68% of UPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCE's grant income comes from Utah funders.

WA
MN
WI
NV
CT
CA
UT
KY
VA
DE
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Utah out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $74k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 31 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like UPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCE

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Utah

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 4%Fundraising 15%

Governance

13
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

89%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

UT

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for UPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds UPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCE?
UPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCE (Utah) receives grants from 31 organizations whose IRS filings report $925,559 to it, the largest being PETERSEN BRUCE & CECILIA FDN-MAIN ($180,000). 19 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does UPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCE have?
IRS filings report 31 organizations giving $925,559 in grants to UPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCE, 19 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of UPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCE?
PETERSEN BRUCE & CECILIA FDN-MAIN is the largest funder on record, with $180,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like UPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 31funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing