Skip to content

Utah · Nonprofit

UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE

UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE (Utah) receives grants from 68 organizations whose IRS filings report $7,746,690 to it, the largest being SORENSON LEGACY FOUNDATION ($1,910,000). 44 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$15M
Funders on record
68
Grants received
$7.7M
Net assets
$21M
44/68 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%
01What it does

What Utah Youth Village does

Mission

The mission of Utah Youth Village is to empower children and families and help generations to come.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Residential treatment homes - alpine academy, located in tooele county, is a fully accredited therapeutic boarding school with two campuses which are approximately three miles apart and provide academic and therapeutic support to youth from all around the united states. The award-winning mountain view campus has been in operation since 2001 and provides services to adolescents assigned female at birth. The new lakeview campus provides these services to adolescents assigned male at birth and officially opened for business in july of 2020. Both campuses are licensed as residential treatment facilities and utilize the evidence-based teaching family model. The dedicated team of licensed therapists, family teachers, academic staff and treatment staff use this model to train the students and their families back home how to better deal with challenging life circumstances in a family style environment which provides a nurturing, individualized and strength-based treatment setting. In addition to the therapeutic environment, the alpine team provides comprehensive academic services that are designed to help improve each student's academic self-esteem and help them get back on track to be…

    $11,439,150 spent$3,589,674 earned by the program
    75% of program spending
  2. Families first - the families first program is a unique intensive in-home intervention for youth and families experiencing challenging life circumstances throughout utah. Village specialists, highly trained in the teaching family model, go into the home and ally with parents, teaching them impactful parenting skills so they can successfully guide their children through the evidence-based program. This program allows families to avoid the disruption of foster care, detention or psychiatric hospitalization.

    $3,126,114 spent$150,594 earned by the program
    20% of program spending
  3. Therapeutic family homes - treatment foster parents live in their own private homes and are licensed and trained with Utah Youth Village to provide treatment to youth between the ages of 0-21. The treatment parents in these homes are highly trained and closely supervised by a program consultant. They learn to use behavioral techniques and a structured program in their home to help foster children. Treatment parents work closely with biological parents, schools, caseworkers, therapists, courts, and others who are involved with the foster youth. Youth are referred to treatment foster homes by a variety of social service agencies, with the utah division of child and family services being the primary referral source. The youth referred are in need of a very structured setting as most of them have failed previous placements in less structured foster homes. The most common referral behaviors are school attendance and behavioral problems, authority conflicts, peer problems, anger/aggression control problems, sexual or physical abuse, neglect, running away, attention deficit or hyperactivity problems, and substance abuse. Treatment in foster care regularly helps youth successfully return…

    $716,101 spent$7,552 earned by the program
    5% of program spending
  4. Mentors work with youth throughout utah who are either in the custody of a state agency or living with family in the community. Most youth are referred by the state department of human services. Mentors do a wide variety of things, such as tutoring youth with academic needs, driving youth to important appointments when a guardian can't, reminding youth of previously acquired skills to help them deal with everyday situations, and spending time just having fun while youth learn relationship building skills. Mentors help youth in as many ways as caseworkers see a need and make requests, and mentors provide a positive influence in the lives of many youth daily. Having a mentor is an opportunity for at risk youth to have another caring adult in their lives, and as we know, every youth is just one caring adult away from being a success.

    $16,590 spent$12,294 earned by the program
    0% of program spending
  5. Smarter parenting is an extensive online resource where parents can learn effective, concrete, proven parenting skills included in the teaching family model. The smarter parenting website offers voluminous amounts of supportive resources which parents from all backgrounds can regularly make use of in order to achieve their specific parenting goals. Along with the website, smarter parenting also offers over 150 downloadable podcasts; a popular you tube channel with an extensive menu of parental tutorial videos, customized online coaching sessions with trained clinicians and individualized behavioral plans. Since its creation in 2012, the resources provided by the smarter parenting team have impacted over one million parents worldwide. Utah Youth Village has a registered national trademark on the name smarter parenting.

    $28,638 spent
    0% of program spending
  6. Families first dissemination is a program created to train, certify and Utah Youth Village 87-0301014 support other agencies in the replication and implementation of our families first program.

    $7,057 spent
    0% of program spending

The 6 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $15,333,650.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($15M) Expenses 100 ($15M) Net assets 100 ($15M)2018 Revenue 96 ($15M) Expenses 98 ($14M) Net assets 103 ($16M)2019 Revenue 126 ($19M) Expenses 106 ($16M) Net assets 127 ($19M)2020 Revenue 97 ($15M) Expenses 107 ($16M) Net assets 122 ($19M)2021 Revenue 105 ($16M) Expenses 96 ($14M) Net assets 132 ($20M)2022 Revenue 98 ($15M) Expenses 104 ($15M) Net assets 148 ($23M)2023 Revenue 107 ($16M) Expenses 114 ($17M) Net assets 148 ($23M)2024 Revenue 114 ($17M) Expenses 119 ($17M) Net assets 147 ($23M)2025 Revenue 100 ($15M) Expenses 116 ($17M) Net assets 139 ($21M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (100)Expenses (116)Net assets (139)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $26M to $28M (+9%).

$22M
$24M
$25M
$27M
$26M
$28M
$28M
$28M
$26M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 64% · 2018 61% · 2019 51% · 2020 61% · 2021 60% · 2022 58% · 2023 54% · 2024 54% · 2025 66%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

73% of UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (21% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,405 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$689k
’17
$392k
’18
$3.7M
’19
−$767k
’20
$2.1M
’21
−$258k
’22
−$301k
’23
−$11k
’24
−$1.6M
’25
3.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Gary L Crocker

Chairman

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed222322212328272927
Joined·+1+2+3+4+7+2+3+2
No longer listed·03422314
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 13 funders to 39 funders, grant income rose $309k → $1.1M.

11 of 68 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 10% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 68 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 25% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

25% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE.

25%
largest funder
52%
top three
~9
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 75% · 2018 71% · 2019 76% · 2020 22% · 2021 25% · 2022 33% · 2023 25% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

43% of UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 65% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

80% of UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE's grant income comes from Utah funders.

WA
MN
WI
NY
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
NM
KS
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Utah out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $746k arriving through sponsors registered in 10 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 2,396 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−10% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve3.6mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)0% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,396 human services nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Organizations like UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Utah

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

90% of spending goes to programs.

Program 90%Management 8%Fundraising 1%

Governance

18
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

UT

Part of a family of 3 related entities

  • Norman and Barbara Tanner 1999 Charitable Support Trust · exempt
  • Meadowbrook Water Users Association · corp_trust
  • Tooele Meadowbrook Hoa · corp_trust

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE?
UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE (Utah) receives grants from 68 organizations whose IRS filings report $7,746,690 to it, the largest being SORENSON LEGACY FOUNDATION ($1,910,000). 44 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE have?
IRS filings report 68 organizations giving $7,746,690 in grants to UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE, 44 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE?
SORENSON LEGACY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,910,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Utah Youth Village →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 68 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing