· Private foundation
David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k24 grants · $114k
- $10k–50k33 grants · $675k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $912k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Madeleine Choir School | $200,000 |
| Moran Eye Center | $117,000 |
| Utah Food Bank | $100,000 |
| Summit Land Conservancy | $75,000 |
| Shriners Hospital For Children | $65,000 |
| Christmas Box International | $55,000 |
| The Nature Conservancy | $50,000 |
| Adopt A Native Elder | $50,000 |
| Maliheh Free Clinic | $50,000 |
| World Central Kitchen | $50,000 |
| The Rural Utah Project | $50,000 |
| Catholic Community Svcs of Utah | $50,000 |
| Friends of the Children - Utah | $40,000 |
| Tree Utah | $40,000 |
| Friends for Sight | $35,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $818k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
98 repeat relationships — 54 still active in FY2024, 44 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $178k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UFUTAH FOOD BANK8× · 2017–2024 · $678k · revenue +93%
- SHSPY HOP PRODUCTIONS8× · 2017–2024 · $449k · revenue +134%
- TCTHE CHRISTMAS BOX INTERNATIONAL5× · 2017–2024 · $292k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- JVJORDAN VALLEY CONSERVATION GARDENSone grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -56% · 66% of their budget
- TWThe Wildlands Conservancyone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +13%
MAUI FOOD BANK INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +138%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…
Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…
Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.
To provide alternative environmentally responsible transportation to downtown travelers through a bike share program.
We are utah's partner in philanthropy, pioneering innovation and collaboration to invest in our community today for a brighter tomorrow.
Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…
The mission of the Utah Safety Council is to save lives by promoting safety and health through education, services, and products.
Our mission is to engage with communities and catalyze private, public, and philanthropic partnerships to remedy opportunity gaps in economic opportunity, education, health, and housing in Utah.
Envision Utah is a nonpartisan public-private partnership that engages people to create and sustain communities that are beautiful, prosperous, healthy, and neighborly for current and future residents.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Children and the most unlike its peers is Aspen Magdalene House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
111 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 111 of the 160 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds SPY HOP PRODUCTIONS ↗
- Who funds Summit Land Conservancy ↗
- Who funds THE CHRISTMAS BOX INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Adopt-A-Native Elder ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF TRACY AVIARY ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS FOR SIGHT ↗
- Who funds Maliheh Free Clinic ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CEDAR MESA ↗
- Who funds BALLET WEST ↗
- Who funds SALT LAKE CITY BICYCLE COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds TREE UTAH ↗
- Who funds Utah Pride Center Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - UTAH ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE SHARING PLACE ↗
- Who funds THE INN BETWEEN ↗
- Who funds JORDAN VALLEY CONSERVATION GARDENS ↗
- Who funds The Wildlands Conservancy ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds ONE HEART WORLDWIDE ↗
- Who funds WASATCH COMMUNITY GARDENS ↗
- Who funds UTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SALT LAKE ACTING COMPANY ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds WASATCH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · McCarthey Family Foundation · Henry W & Leslie M Eskuche Charitable Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · Marriner S Eccles Foundation · Willard L Eccles Charitable Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.