· Private foundation
Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k103 grants · $2.8M
- $50k–250k117 grants · $13M
- $250k+62 grants · $57M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Northern Star Council Boy Scouts of America | $7,710,000 |
| Mayo Clinic | $6,000,000 |
| St Croix Valley Food Bank | $4,525,000 |
| St Croix Valley Foundation | $4,131,500 |
| Osceola Medical Center | $3,600,000 |
| CommonBond Communities | $1,150,000 |
| Science Museum of Minnesota | $1,125,000 |
| Community Dental Care | $1,030,000 |
| Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation | $1,000,000 |
| Amery Regional Medical Center | $1,000,000 |
| Christian Community Campus Foundation | $1,000,000 |
| The Minneapolis Foundation | $1,000,000 |
| Tubman | $1,000,000 |
| Allina Health Foundation | $1,000,000 |
| Children's Health Care Foundation | $1,000,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $34.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
384 repeat relationships — 247 still active in FY2025, 137 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.6M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NSNORTHERN STAR COUNCIL5× · 2021–2025 · $20M · revenue +17% · 57% of their budget
- TCTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY6× · 2020–2025 · $11M · revenue +46%
- SCST CROIX VALLEY FOODBANK INC5× · 2021–2025 · $7.8M · revenue +249% · 50% of their budget
Funded once
PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $2.6M · revenue 0%- PHPRESBYTERIAN HOMES INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $2.2M · revenue +37%
- OHOPERATION HELPone grant, 2022 · $1.0M
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
Touchstone mental health provides innovative, person-centered services that foster hope, health and well-being. we envision a world where all people whose lives are affected by mental illness will flourish with effective treatment, quality…
Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.
Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.
United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.
Our mission is empowering people as they age.
Move minnesota leads the movement for an equitable and sustainable transportation system that puts people first. we are passionate about connecting communities, ending the climate crisis, expanding access to jobs and resources, and…
The mission of the foundation for health care continuums is to strengthen each community we serve by providing a wide spectrum of housing and health care services that honor the evolving, aging population.
Connectability of mn, inc. works to advance the independence, productivity, and full citizenship of people experiencing physical or invisible barriers.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Health Care Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Thomas E & Edna D Carpenter Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
353 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 353 of the 562 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN STAR COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds REGIONS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds ST CROIX VALLEY FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds AMERY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST CROIX VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LADD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds COMMONBOND COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Arts Partnership ↗
- Who funds THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Solid Ground ↗
- Who funds FAMILYMEANS ↗
- Who funds TUBMAN ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds Gillette Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds ALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION ASSOCIATION OF ST PAUL INC ↗
- Who funds Valley Outreach ↗
- Who funds CANCER CENTER OF WESTERN WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION HELP INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds Animal Humane Society ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY THREAD ↗
- Who funds ST CROIX VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds THOMAS IRVINE DODGE NATURE CENTER ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hugh J Andersen Foundation · Hardenbergh Foundation · St Croix Valley Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Andersen Corporate Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Hubbard Broadcasting Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Mardag Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Neads Inc — 1% of income from government
- Nichols College — 0% of income from government
- Palm Beach Atlantic University Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.