Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$48M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1,431
Grants FY2024still arriving
48
States reached
$10M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Education$110MHealth$72MHuman Services$54MPhilanthropy$20MFood & Nutrition$16MHousing & Shelter$16MYouth Development$10MEmployment$4.1MOther$0
02FY2024 · 1431 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1069 grants · $3.9M
  • $10k–50k229 grants · $5.6M
  • $50k–250k96 grants · $8.3M
  • $250k+37 grants · $30M
$5,000
Median grant
48
States reached
$218M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$10,000,000
MOFFITT CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION$3,000,000
CATHOLIC SCHOOLS CENTER OF EXCELLENCE$1,873,000
UNIV OF ST THOMAS$1,266,325
CATHOLIC SCHOOLS CENTER OF EXCELLENCE$1,050,000
CHILDRENS HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION$1,000,000
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION - 2$1,000,000
UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS$952,312
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$700,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$700,000
CATHOLIC SCHOOLS CENTER OF EXCELLENCE$650,000
CATHOLIC SCHOOLS CENTER OF EXCELLENCE$550,000
CATHOLIC SCHOOLS CENTER OF EXCELLENCE$500,000
CATHOLIC SCHOOLS CENTER OF EXCELLENCE$450,000
CATHOLIC SCHOOLS CENTER OF EXCELLENCE$450,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $27.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $1.0M → 11%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $215k → 10%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $200k → 10%YOUTH FRONTIERS: $125k → 11%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $200k → 10%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $200k → 10%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $125k → 10%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $125k → 10%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $125k → 10%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $125k → 10%COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE: $130k → 11%BETTER TOGETHER: $130k → 10%COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE: $130k → 11%BETTER TOGETHER: $130k → 10%BETTER TOGETHER: $130k → 10%BETTER TOGETHER: $130k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $325k → 10%AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 14%NAPLES SENIOR CENTER AT JFCS: $500k → 10%YWCA MINNEAPOLIS: $150k → 11%NAPLES SENIOR CENTER AT JFCS: $150k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICE: $150k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $325k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $250k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $250k → 10%FIRST CHILDREN'S FINANCE: $150k → 11%FIRST CHILDREN'S FINANCE: $150k → 11%FIRST CHILDREN'S FINANCE: $150k → 11%FIRST CHILDREN'S FINANCE: $150k → 11%THE LINK: $175k → 11%YMCA OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES: $3.0M → 11%YMCA OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES: $1.0M → 11%YMCA OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES: $500k → 11%YMCA OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES: $167k → 11%YMCA OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES: $167k → 11%YMCA OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES: $166k → 11%YMCA OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES: $165k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING: $500k → 11%OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $400k → 11%OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $300k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING: $135k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $135k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $135k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $135k → 11%YWCA OF MINNEAPOLIS: $250k → 11%YWCA OF MINNEAPOLIS: $150k → 11%YWCA OF MINNEAPOLIS: $150k → 11%YWCA OF MINNEAPOLIS: $150k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$289M · 919 repeat orgs$13M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

919 repeat relationships — 452 still active in FY2024, 467 since wound down; 279 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

919
776

Total granted

$289M
$11M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+17%

Still filing today

65%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CATHOLIC SCHOOLS CENTER OF EXCELLENCE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $43M · revenue +50% · 82% of their budget
  • UO
    University of St Thomas
    7× · 2018–2024 · $17M · revenue +47%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $11M · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • EA
    EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue -55%
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1.0M
  • BB
    BEST BUY DISASTER RELIEF CO BEST BU
    one grant, 2022 · $430k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Partners for Affordable Housing

Provides shelter for homeless families & individuals, & helps them to secure long-term housing.

2
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
3
Family Promise of Greater Des Moines

To provide shelter and services to families experiencing homelessness

4
Life House Inc

To reconnect homeless and street youth to their dreams.

Youth Development
5
Hope Haven Inc

Nurturing independence through services for children, adults, and families with unique challenges.

6
Family Promise of the Chippewa

Serve families who are homeless, or at risk of homelessness, by providing resources in the areas of emergency assistance, stabilization and prevention.

Human Services
7
Advocates for Family Peace

To improve lives by ending domestic violence.

Human Services
8
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need.

Human Services
9
Mental Health Minnesota

Mental Health Minnesota is the voice of lived mental health expenience. We carry that declaration forward as we work to advance mental health and well-being for all, increase access to mental health treatment and services, and provide…

Health
10
Mercy House Living Centers

To be the leader in ending homelessness by providing a unique system of dignified housing alternatives, programs, and supportive services.

Housing & Shelter
11
Wayfinder Family Services

Wayfinder's mission is to ensure that children, youth and adults facing challenges always have a place to turn.

Human Services
12
Foundation for the Homeless Inc

Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fostering Hope Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Vassar College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDomestic Violence ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Volunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Youth Sports ProgramsElementary Literacy TutoringMilitary Veterans SupportJewish Community Organizati…Animal Rescue and ShelterAffordable Housing Construc…Christian Youth CampsImmigrant Worker SupportEquine Therapy ProgramsYouth Development ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Addiction Recovery ServicesFaith-Based Social ServicesYouth Mentoring ProgramsCancer Support ServicesLocal Food System Organizat…Community FoundationsPregnancy Support ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Local History MuseumsSchool Parent OrganizationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyPublic Library OperationsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community Arts CentersUnited Way AffiliatesSchool District FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Environmental Conservation …Youth Development CentersIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Food PantriesLgbtq+ Community SupportYmca Youth DevelopmentSenior Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Health Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…Food Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%5%<5yr12%16%5–10yr20%25%10–20yr17%21%20–35yr16%19%35–55yr18%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%0%<5yr12%2%5–10yr20%27%10–20yr17%22%20–35yr16%20%35–55yr18%29%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.6% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.6%16/2,662
the rest of the field
11%
3,825/36,327

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

1308 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1308 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
315
Early backer (in before they grew)
1278/1308
Grantees still filing
872/1308
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY-ATL — $10,498,600 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY-ATLMOFFITT CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION — $9,000,550 · OtherMOFFITT CANCER CENTER FOUNDATIONCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $8,257,775 · OtherCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES — $7,613,525 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIESMOFFITT CANCER CENTER — $6,025,000 · OtherMOFFITT CANCER CENTER+101 more — $63,409,848 · Other+101 moreCATHOLIC SCHOOLS CENTER OF EXCELLENCE (CSCOE) — $42,802,880 · EducationCATHOLIC SCHOOLS CENTER OF EXCELLE…University of St Thomas — $17,244,951 · EducationUniversity of St ThomasUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $10,683,616 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATIONFLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,714,550 · Education+17 more — $7,077,450 · Education+17 moreYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH — $5,534,834 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS C…GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $1,576,100 · Human ServicesGRACE PLACE …Guadalupe Center Inc — $1,520,000 · Human ServicesGuadalupe Ce…PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC — $1,425,100 · Human ServicesAMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION — $1,415,285 · Human ServicesOPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA — $1,225,406 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC — $1,085,000 · Human ServicesYWCA OF MINNEAPOLIS — $1,000,000 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000,000 · Human Services+27 more — $12,285,386 · Human Services+27 moreAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $10,227,000 · HealthAMERICAN C…NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC — $3,745,000 · HealthNEIGHBORHO…CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION — $2,500,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S…CANCER ALLIANCE NETWORK INC — $1,230,000 · HealthDAVID LAWRENCE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $1,051,000 · HealthGillette Children's Hospital Foundation — $975,000 · Health+11 more — $4,240,884 · Health+11 moreBEST BUY FOUNDATION — $5,285,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION — $3,393,100 · PhilanthropyEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF COLLIER COUNTY INC — $1,800,725 · PhilanthropyNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC — $1,500,000 · PhilanthropyTHE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC — $1,020,000 · Philanthropy+3 more — $833,000 · PhilanthropyST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $3,326,026 · Housing & ShelterHabitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc — $1,855,000 · Housing & ShelterJEREMIAH PROGRAM — $850,000 · Housing & ShelterAEON — $596,000 · Housing & Shelter+2 more — $440,000 · Housing & ShelterSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $4,713,125 · Food & NutritionFOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE — $602,225 · Food & NutritionMEALS OF HOPE INC — $535,000 · Food & NutritionEVERY MEAL — $480,100 · Food & NutritionHUNGER IMPACT PARTNERS — $250,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $210,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$104,805,298Education$80,523,447Human Services$28,067,111Health$23,968,884Philanthropy$13,831,825Housing & Shelter$7,067,026Food & Nutrition$6,790,450

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCATHOLIC SCHOOLS CENTER OF EXCELLENCE (CSCOE) — $42,802,880 over 7y, 82% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas — $17,244,951 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $10,683,616 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $10,227,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $8,257,775 over 7y, 14% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH — $5,534,834 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetBEST BUY FOUNDATION — $5,285,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $4,713,125 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC — $3,745,000 over 6y, 19% of budgetTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION — $3,393,100 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $3,326,026 over 6y, 12% of budgetFLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,714,550 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION — $2,500,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc — $1,855,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF COLLIER COUNTY INC — $1,800,725 over 7y, 7.8% of budgetYMCA OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $1,790,000 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetGRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $1,576,100 over 7y, 6.9% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc — $1,520,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC — $1,500,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetPROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC — $1,425,100 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetAMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION — $1,415,285 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetCANCER ALLIANCE NETWORK INC — $1,230,000 over 7y, 25% of budgetOPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA — $1,225,406 over 6y, 6.7% of budgetDUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY — $1,200,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetYMCA of Collier County — $1,198,298 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC — $1,085,000 over 7y, 5.1% of budgetDAVID LAWRENCE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $1,051,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTHE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC — $1,020,000 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetYWCA OF MINNEAPOLIS — $1,000,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGillette Children's Hospital Foundation — $975,000 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES — $947,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetTwin Cities Rise — $909,200 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetKeystone Community Services — $900,000 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetSUMMIT ACADEMY OIC — $900,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetBAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES INC — $900,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetWAY TO GROW — $850,000 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM — $850,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC — $840,000 over 7y, 7.3% of budgetPACER CENTER INC — $820,000 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA — $785,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST CHILDREN'S FINANCE — $750,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetFRASER — $711,290 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $700,200 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SANNEH FOUNDATION — $700,000 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetWashburn Center for Children — $700,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetTRUE FRIENDS — $685,000 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetSIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES INC — $655,100 over 7y, 1.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC SCHOOLS CENTER OF EXCELLENCE (CSCOE)
  • Who funds University of St Thomas
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH
  • Who funds BEST BUY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC
  • Who funds THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC
  • Who funds FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc
  • Who funds EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF COLLIER COUNTY INC
  • Who funds YMCA OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC
  • Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc
  • Who funds NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC
  • Who funds AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CANCER ALLIANCE NETWORK INC
  • Who funds OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA
  • Who funds DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY
  • Who funds YMCA of Collier County
  • Who funds COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC
  • Who funds DAVID LAWRENCE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grapevine giving foundationNY105.7× affinity311 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grapevine giving foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Hardenbergh Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · The Walser Foundation · Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation · Allina Health System · Andersen Corporate Foundation · The Sauer Family Foundation · Wca Foundation · The Sheltering Arms Foundation · Target Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 160%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Northeastern University7% of income from government
  • The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc2% of income from government
  • David Lawrence Mental Health Center Inc1% of income from government
  • Ymca of Collier County0% of income from government
  • Youth Haven Inc0% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
16get no government money at all
76report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph