· Private foundation
Hugh J Andersen Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k69 grants · $336k
- $10k–50k134 grants · $3.6M
- $50k–250k60 grants · $4.8M
- $250k+3 grants · $1.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA | $500,000 |
| LAKEVIEW HEALTH FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA | $500,000 |
| SOLID GROUND | $200,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MN ND AND SD | $200,000 |
| CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY | $150,000 |
| WEST CENTRAL WI COMMUNITY ACTION | $130,000 |
| WOMENVENTURE | $130,000 |
| ST CROIX VALLEY HABITAT HUMANITY | $120,000 |
| TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $110,000 |
| CLEAR LAKE AREA COMMUNITY CENTER | $105,000 |
| OPERATION HELP | $105,000 |
| WASHINGTON CO HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $100,000 |
| SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $8.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
271 repeat relationships — 196 still active in FY2025, 75 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $373k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY7× · 2019–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +53%
- SGSolid Ground7× · 2019–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +349%
- TTUBMAN7× · 2019–2025 · $969k · revenue +54%
Funded once
- BPBAYPORT PUBLIC LIBRARYone grant, 2021 · $350k
UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFone grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +1%- FOFRIENDS OF THE ELLSWORTH PUBLIC LIBone grant, 2022 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Touchstone mental health provides innovative, person-centered services that foster hope, health and well-being. we envision a world where all people whose lives are affected by mental illness will flourish with effective treatment, quality…
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
Strengthen central mn communities through leadership in workforce excellence.
The open door is a leading hunger-relief organization serving dakota county, minnesota, where food insecurity is a growing challenge. the open door is dedicated to ending local hunger by providing access to healthy, fresh, and nutritious…
Minnesota housing partnership (mhp) expands housing and community development opportunity by leading collaborative work to promote systems change and grow develoopment capacity.
Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.
The mission of cornerhouse is to partner with families, communities, and systems - entrusted with the safety of children, youth and vulnerable adults - to reduce trauma and end abuse.
Our mission is empowering people as they age.
Move minnesota leads the movement for an equitable and sustainable transportation system that puts people first. we are passionate about connecting communities, ending the climate crisis, expanding access to jobs and resources, and…
Make mental health healthier through treatment, training, education, and information.
Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.
Working in partnership with the community to empower residents to improve their physical, social and economic well-being. we work to alleviate the causes and conditions of poverty.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Charities Review Council and the most unlike its peers is St Croix Food Shelf. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
249 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 249 of the 350 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds Solid Ground ↗
- Who funds TUBMAN ↗
- Who funds Women's Foundation of Minnesota ↗
- Who funds AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
- Who funds ST CROIX VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF MN AND WI RIVER VALLEYS INC ↗
- Who funds ANN BANCROFT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMONBOND COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds FAMILYMEANS ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY THREAD ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
- Who funds LAKEVIEW HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Minnesota Children's Museum ↗
- Who funds Valley Outreach ↗
- Who funds ST CROIX VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOMENVENTURE ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds FOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE ↗
- Who funds OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds ST CROIX VALLEY FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH ↗
- Who funds TRUE FRIENDS ↗
- Who funds COMPAS INC ↗
- Who funds ARTREACH ST CROIX ↗
- Who funds River Falls Community Food Pantry ↗
- Who funds FamilyWise Services ↗
- Who funds CLARE HOUSING ↗
- Who funds PHIPPS CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds Dream of Wild Health ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · St Croix Valley Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Hardenbergh Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Andersen Corporate Foundation · Mardag Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · The Minneapolis Foundation · Target Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hugh J Andersen Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Southwest Florida Community Foundation Inc — 69% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.