Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hardenbergh Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$6.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
185
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Human Services$5.8MArts & Culture$5.2MHealth$4.4MHousing & Shelter$4.0MYouth Development$3.4MCommunity Improvement$2.0MEducation$1.7MRecreation & Sports$1.7MOther$0
02FY2025 · 185 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k148 grants · $2.7M
  • $50k–250k30 grants · $2.6M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.5M
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$69M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UJAMAA PLACE$500,000
LAKEVIEW HEALTH FOUNDATION$500,000
WAKAN TIPI AWANYANKAPI$250,000
FACE TO FACE HEALTH AND COUNSELING$250,000
PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION$200,000
BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE$200,000
MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION$150,000
YWCA ST PAUL$125,000
COMMONBOND COMMUNITIES$100,000
GOODWILL-EASTER SEALS MINNESOTA$100,000
ST PAUL URBAN TENNIS$100,000
THE PLAYWRIGHTS' CENTER$100,000
LATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CENTER$100,000
TRUE FRIENDS$100,000
DODGE NATURE CENTER$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $7.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $20k → 16%BETHESDA LUTHERAN COMMUNITIES: $250k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $25k → 9%CANVAS HEALTH: $177k → 6%DRAWER: $40k → 6%CANVAS HEALTH INC: $103k → 6%DRAWER INC: $70k → 6%DRAWER: $40k → 6%OPEN ARMS: $100k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING: $25k → 11%OPEN ARMS: $100k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $350k → 14%COMMUNITY THREAD: $50k → 6%COMMUNITY THREAD: $45k → 6%FAMILYMEANS: $30k → 6%FAMILYMEANS: $25k → 6%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $30k → 14%FAMILYMEANS: $25k → 6%FAMILYMEANS: $25k → 6%FAMILYMEANS: $25k → 6%FAMILYMEANS: $25k → 6%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $250k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $200k → 14%YMCA OF THE NORTH: $100k → 11%MERRICK COMMUNITY SERVICES: $65k → 14%MERRICK COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 14%MERRICK COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 14%ELPIS ENTERPRISES: $50k → 14%FACE TO FACE HEALTH AND COUNSELING: $250k → 14%MERRICK COMMUNITY SERVICES: $125k → 14%MERRICK COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30k → 14%UJAMAA PLACE: $50k → 14%UJAMAA PLACE: $25k → 14%SOLID GROUND: $100k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1.1M → 14%AIN DAH YUNG CENTER: $265k → 14%OUR LADY OF PEACE: $250k → 14%AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $25k → 14%UJAMAA PLACE: $25k → 14%UJAMAA PLACE: $25k → 14%UJAMAA PLACE: $25k → 14%UJAMAA PLACE: $500k → 14%UNION GOSPEL MISSION TWIN CITIES: $85k → 14%FREEDOM PLACE: $34k → 14%FREEDOM PLACE INC: $30k → 14%UJAMAA PLACE: $30k → 14%UNION GOSPEL MISSION TWIN CITIES: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
OH
PA
CA
MO
VA
AZ
DC
HI
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$26M · 210 repeat orgs$7.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

210 repeat relationships — 136 still active in FY2025, 74 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

210
91

Total granted

$26M
$5.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+6%

Still filing today

82%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    COMMUNITY DENTAL CARE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +162%
  • UP
    UJAMAA PLACE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $680k · revenue +25%
  • KC
    Keystone Community Services
    6× · 2020–2025 · $585k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $350k · revenue +8%
  • NC
    NATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN
    one grant, 2024 · $260k
  • HH
    HUDSON HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
2
St Paul Transportation Management Organization

Move minnesota leads the movement for an equitable and sustainable transportation system that puts people first. we are passionate about connecting communities, ending the climate crisis, expanding access to jobs and resources, and…

Environment
3
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
4
African Development Center

Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota

Human Services
5
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
6
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—
7
United Way of Ne Minnesota

United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.

—
8
Touchstone Mental Health

Touchstone mental health provides innovative, person-centered services that foster hope, health and well-being. we envision a world where all people whose lives are affected by mental illness will flourish with effective treatment, quality…

Human Services
9
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
10
Minnesota Council of Nonprofits Inc

The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.

Philanthropy
11
Minnesota Jewish Community Center

The minnesota jcc is dedicated to strengthening our community by providing inclusive programs that inspire personal growth, foster connection, and promote well-being through arts, culture, education, fitness, early childhood, day camp and…

—
12
Minneapolis Downtown Council

To create an extraordinary downtown minneapolis, applying the core values of leadership, collaboration, advocacy and innovation.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Home Society of Minnesota and the most unlike its peers is Big Ideas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAccessible Senior HousingYouth & Family Support Serv…Disability Services Organiz…Emergency Food & Basic NeedsYouth Sports LeaguesChristian Faith FormationSenior Residential CareEarly Childhood Education C…East African Immigrant Serv…Veterans Service Organizati…Minnesota Community Foundat…Family Philanthropic Founda…Senior Housing & Home CareProfessional Industry Assoc…Community Arts & PerformanceAffordable Housing Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%3%<5yr14%7%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr19%25%20–35yr14%31%35–55yr13%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr19%23%20–35yr14%34%35–55yr13%23%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.4%1/264
the rest of the field
14%
2,029/14,279

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

254 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 254 of the 336 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
57
Early backer (in before they grew)
247/254
Grantees still filing
159/254
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LISTENING HOUSE — $850,000 · OtherLISTENING HOUSEKeystone Community Services — $585,000 · Other+91 more — $12,071,250 · Other+91 moreNEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $1,190,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT…UJAMAA PLACE — $680,000 · Human ServicesUJAMAA PLACELUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA — $495,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE …PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION — $450,000 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUND…CANVAS HEALTH INC — $345,000 · Human ServicesAIN DAH YUNG (OUR HOME) CENTER — $335,000 · Human ServicesFace to Face Health and Counseling Service Inc — $305,000 · Human ServicesMERRICK COMMUNITY SERVICES — $285,000 · Human ServicesOUR LADY OF PEACE — $280,000 · Human ServicesABLELIGHT INC — $250,000 · Human Services+25 more — $2,291,000 · Human Services+25 moreThe Arts Partnership — $560,000 · Arts & CultureThe Arts Part…MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $450,000 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA HIS…MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION MUSEUM INC — $325,000 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA TRA…FILMNORTH — $200,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PLAYWRIGHTS' CENTER INC — $200,000 · Arts & CultureSCANDIA HERITAGE ALLIANCE — $170,000 · Arts & CultureWASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $160,000 · Arts & CultureRAMSEY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $150,000 · Arts & CultureVictoria Theater Arts Center dba 825 Arts — $140,000 · Arts & CultureMinnesota Children's Museum — $130,000 · Arts & Culture+19 more — $1,295,000 · Arts & Culture+19 moreCOMMUNITY DENTAL CARE — $1,165,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY D…LAKEVIEW HEALTH FOUNDATION — $600,000 · HealthLAKEVIEW HE…REGIONS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $500,000 · HealthREGIONS HOS…TUBMAN — $410,000 · HealthTUBMANCERENITY SENIOR CARE — $245,000 · HealthCERENITY SE…+4 more — $310,000 · Health+4 moreTHE SAINT PAUL PARKS CONSERVANCY — $405,000 · EnvironmentLOWER PHALEN CREEK PROJECT — $350,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $200,000 · EnvironmentRICE STREET GARDENS Rice Street Gardens — $150,000 · EnvironmentGREAT RIVER PASSAGE CONSERVANCY — $125,000 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $100,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER — $65,000 · EnvironmentRIVER VALLEY TRAILS INC — $50,000 · EnvironmentMINNDEPENDENT — $195,000 · EducationMONTESSORI TRAINING CENTER OF MINNESOTA INC — $187,500 · EducationSUMMIT ACADEMY OIC — $160,000 · EducationMETROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $120,000 · EducationCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC — $105,000 · EducationAFRICAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS — $100,000 · EducationREADING PARTNERS — $85,000 · EducationTHE PARTNERSHIP PLAN FOR STILLWATER AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $65,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $62,500 · EducationEAST SIDE LEARNING CENTER — $60,000 · EducationBreakthrough Twin Cities — $60,000 · EducationCATHOLIC SCHOOLS CENTER OF EXCELLENCE (CSCOE) — $50,000 · EducationUniversity of St Thomas — $50,000 · Education+2 more — $87,500 · EducationLatino Economic Development Center — $300,000 · Housing & ShelterLAND BANK TWIN CITIES INC — $200,000 · Housing & ShelterSolid Ground Washington — $200,000 · Housing & ShelterEMMA NORTON SERVICES — $150,000 · Housing & ShelterJEREMIAH PROGRAM — $110,000 · Housing & ShelterWOMEN'S ADVOCATES INC — $100,000 · Housing & ShelterST CROIX FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER — $70,000 · Housing & ShelterTWO RIVERS COMMUNITY LAND TRUST — $60,000 · Housing & ShelterOPPORTUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD — $57,500 · Housing & ShelterIRIS PARK COMMONS — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterAEON — $50,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$13,506,250Human Services$6,906,000Arts & Culture$3,780,000Health$3,230,000Environment$1,445,000Education$1,387,500Housing & Shelter$1,347,500

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $1,190,000 over 5y, 6.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY DENTAL CARE — $1,165,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetUJAMAA PLACE — $680,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetLAKEVIEW HEALTH FOUNDATION — $600,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetKeystone Community Services — $585,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetThe Arts Partnership — $560,000 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetREGIONS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA — $495,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $450,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION — $450,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetWALKER WEST MUSIC ACADEMY — $442,500 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetTRUE FRIENDS — $435,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetTUBMAN — $410,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetTHE SAINT PAUL PARKS CONSERVANCY — $405,000 over 6y, 43% of budgetTHE SANNEH FOUNDATION — $385,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetLOWER PHALEN CREEK PROJECT — $350,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $350,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE — $350,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMONBOND COMMUNITIES — $350,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCANVAS HEALTH INC — $345,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetAIN DAH YUNG (OUR HOME) CENTER — $335,000 over 6y, 6.6% of budgetMINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION MUSEUM INC — $325,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetFace to Face Health and Counseling Service Inc — $305,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetLatino Economic Development Center — $300,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetThe JK Movement — $300,000 over 5y, 22% of budgetMERRICK COMMUNITY SERVICES — $285,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetOUR LADY OF PEACE — $280,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetHUDSON HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC — $250,000 over 1y, 21% of budget180 DEGREES INC — $250,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetWHITE BEAR LAKE AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $250,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetABLELIGHT INC — $250,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEQUASPACE — $250,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetCERENITY SENIOR CARE — $245,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHRISTIAN CUPBOARD EMERGENCY FOOD SHELF DBA OPEN CUPBOARD — $245,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetGoodwill Industries Inc — $220,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSAINT PAUL & MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $220,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBridging Inc — $210,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetLAND BANK TWIN CITIES INC — $200,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetFILMNORTH — $200,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetTHOMAS IRVINE DODGE NATURE CENTER — $200,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetTree Trust — $200,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetBELWIN CONSERVANCY — $200,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetTHE PLAYWRIGHTS' CENTER INC — $200,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetSolid Ground Washington — $200,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA — $200,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMINNDEPENDENT — $195,000 over 6y, 6.9% of budgetBIG IDEAS INC — $190,000 over 3y, 11% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fr Bigelow FoundationFred C and Katherine …Saint Paul & Minnesot…Otto Bremer TrustMardag FoundationHugh J Andersen Found…Andersen Corporate Fo…The Hubbard Broadcast…Greater Twin Cities U…Target FoundationThe Richard M Schulze…The Minneapolis Found…
Fr Bigelow FoundationMN204.6× affinity114 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fr Bigelow Foundation · Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Mardag Foundation · Hugh J Andersen Foundation · Andersen Corporate Foundation · The Hubbard Broadcasting Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Target Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hardenbergh Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    84report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hardenbergh Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hardenbergh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 336 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home