Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Best Friends Animal Society

To bring about a time when there are no more homeless pets.

$17M
Granted FY2024still arriving
307
Grants FY2024still arriving
States reached
$2.4M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Animals$57MPublic Benefit$1.4MHuman Services$488kPhilanthropy$318kEducation$280kCrime & Legal$207kFood & Nutrition$49kHousing & Shelter$41kOther$0
02FY2024 · 307 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 307 grants below total $16,053,157 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $17,110,976 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,057,819 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k79 grants · $547k
  • $10k–50k174 grants · $3.8M
  • $50k–250k43 grants · $4.0M
  • $250k+11 grants · $7.8M
$17,405
Median grant
States reached
$201M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AUSTIN PETS ALIVE$2,350,000
JACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY$1,394,250
OPERATION KINDNESS$865,525
HUMANE SOCIETY OF HALL COUNTY - NORTHEAST GEORGIA$544,900
WEST VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY$492,000
THOMASVILLE THOMAS CTY HUMANE SOCIETY$486,300
SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY$399,531
MASSACHUSETTS SPCA$399,300
HUMANE SOCIETY FOR GREATER SAVANNAH$316,600
CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY$268,990
PAWS FOR LIFE K9 RESCUE$262,350
ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA$240,000
BETTERTOGETHER FOREVER$203,750
BELLEVILLE AREA HUMANE SOCIETY$201,705
ANGEL CITY PIT BULLS$201,542
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$48M · 352 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

352 repeat relationships — 174 still active in FY2024, 178 since wound down; 132 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

352
409

Total granted

$48M
$8.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+23%

Still filing today

72%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    JACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +14%
  • AP
    AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +30%
  • SC
    STRAY CAT ALLIANCE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • AO
    ACE OF HEARTSgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $898k · revenue +153%
  • PB
    PALM BEACH COUNTY DIVISION OF SENIOR SERVICES
    one grant, 2017 · $256k
  • RC
    RANDOLPH COUNTY ANIMAL SERVICES
    one grant, 2023 · $171k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
2
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
3
Safe Haven Inc
Animals
4
Paws Animal Rescue Center

To help rescue unwanted pets

Animals
5
Pound Pets Inc

Animal Rescue - finding homes for abandoned animals in Granite City, spaying and neutering stray animals and feral cats

Animals
6
Claws and Paws for a Cause

For our community we provide high quality low cost spay and neuter services as well as low cost vaccinations. we do have programs that allows us to help the families that have pets but are in financial strain and not able to have their…

Religion
7
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
8
Raskels Rescue
Animals
9
Humane Society of Union County Inc

The Humane Society of Union County exists to reduce the number of abused, abandoned, and neglected cats and dogs through rescue, rehabilitation, adoption, and spay and neuter.

Animals
10
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
11
Paws and Claws Animal Welfare Society Inc

Animal Rescue

Animals
12
Hart

Animal shelter and rescue

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Animal Friends Humane Society and the most unlike its peers is The Serengeti Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and ShelterCommunity College Foundatio…Health Access Advocacy and …Equine Therapy ProgramsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%13%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%19%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%10/882
the rest of the field
13%
240,386/1,818,683

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

599 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 599 of the 894 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

21
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
184
Early backer (in before they grew)
580/599
Grantees still filing
383/599
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $2,990,844 · AnimalsJACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INCAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC — $2,841,874 · AnimalsAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INCSTRAY CAT ALLIANCE — $1,740,453 · AnimalsOPERATION KINDNESS — $1,522,847 · AnimalsKITTEN RESCUE — $1,472,325 · AnimalsCOMMUNITY ANIMAL MEDICINE PROJECT INC — $1,335,475 · Animals+138 more — $25,982,509 · Animals+138 moreANIMAL BALANCE — $482,750 · OtherANIMAL BALANCEREZ-SOLUTIONS AND ANIMAL SHELTER INC — $338,000 · OtherHORRY COUNTY GOVERNMENT — $313,980 · OtherCATS CATS CATS RESCUE INC — $312,400 · OtherPAW MISSION INC — $265,985 · OtherPALM BEACH COUNTY DIVISION OF SENIOR SERVICES — $256,239 · OtherCITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND PARKS — $244,756 · OtherCOUNTY OF RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH AGENCY — $221,166 · OtherABILENE FIRE DEPARTMENT — $214,259 · Other+42 more — $3,753,591 · Other+42 moreKITTY BUNGALOW CHARM SCHOOL FOR WAYWARD CATS — $602,410 · EducationCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $89,250 · EducationFJC — $318,250 · Crime & LegalENID SPCA — $105,832 · Youth DevelopmentPETCO LOVE — $100,000 · Philanthropy
Animals$37,886,327Other$6,403,126Education$691,660Crime & Legal$318,250Youth Development$105,832Philanthropy$100,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $2,990,844 over 7y, 17% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC — $2,841,874 over 7y, 11% of budgetSTRAY CAT ALLIANCE — $1,740,453 over 8y, 12% of budgetOPERATION KINDNESS — $1,522,847 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetKITTEN RESCUE — $1,472,325 over 8y, 14% of budgetCOMMUNITY ANIMAL MEDICINE PROJECT INC — $1,335,475 over 7y, 12% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF HALL COUNTY INC — $1,102,100 over 2y, 20% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $989,300 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPALM VALLEY ANIMAL SOCIETY FKA PALM VALLEY ANIMAL CENTER — $979,844 over 6y, 11% of budgetHeaven on Earth Society for Animals Inc — $944,100 over 7y, 9.9% of budgetBRANDYWINE VALLEY SPCA — $909,120 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetTHOMASVILLE-THOMAS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $898,965 over 5y, 52% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $806,245 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetANGEL CITY PIT BULLS — $652,157 over 8y, 22% of budgetKITTY BUNGALOW CHARM SCHOOL FOR WAYWARD CATS — $602,410 over 8y, 24% of budgetWEST VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $542,400 over 4y, 25% of budgetMAYOR'S ALLIANCE FOR NYC'S ANIMALS INC — $520,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetANIMAL BALANCE — $482,750 over 6y, 31% of budgetCHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY — $463,155 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF HARLINGEN — $426,650 over 5y, 11% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR GREATER SAVANNAH — $419,665 over 4y, 13% of budgetLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC — $376,260 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetPAWS FOR LIFE K9 RESCUE — $369,900 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetONE TAIL AT A TIME NFP — $368,380 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetLYNCHBURG HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $330,776 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetFJC — $318,250 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHumane Society of Southern Arizona — $306,050 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetSOURIS VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $303,950 over 2y, 21% of budgetAcadiana Animal Aid — $296,082 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC — $273,675 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetFRESNO HUMANE ANIMAL SERVICES — $270,490 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetDELAWARE COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $263,712 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetFixNation Inc — $263,175 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetSPAY NEUTER INITIATIVE PROGRAM — $257,675 over 4y, 86% of budgetSOUTH SUBURBAN HUMANE SOCIETY — $225,065 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetSECOND LEASH ON LIFE INC — $225,000 over 3y, 47% of budgetHouston Pets Alive — $223,550 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetTHE ANIMAL FOUNDATION — $218,763 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER DAYTON — $218,362 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetBETTERTOGETHER FOREVER — $215,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL OF NEW YORK CITY INC — $213,318 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBELLEVILLE AREA HUMANE SOCIETY — $201,705 over 1y, 17% of budgetVANDERBURGH COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $187,125 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetHOMEWARD TRAILS ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $185,580 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetOKLAHOMA ALLIANCE FOR ANIMALS INC — $179,340 over 4y, 11% of budgetNuzzles & Co — $179,231 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetTHE LITTLE LION FOUNDATION — $171,450 over 5y, 27% of budgetFIX WEST TEXAS — $162,362 over 4y, 4.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC
  • Who funds STRAY CAT ALLIANCE
  • Who funds OPERATION KINDNESS
  • Who funds KITTEN RESCUE
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ANIMAL MEDICINE PROJECT INC
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF HALL COUNTY INC
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds PALM VALLEY ANIMAL SOCIETY FKA PALM VALLEY ANIMAL CENTER
  • Who funds Heaven on Earth Society for Animals Inc
  • Who funds BRANDYWINE VALLEY SPCA
  • Who funds THOMASVILLE-THOMAS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds ACE OF HEARTS
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA
  • Who funds ANGEL CITY PIT BULLS
  • Who funds KITTY BUNGALOW CHARM SCHOOL FOR WAYWARD CATS
  • Who funds WEST VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds MAYOR'S ALLIANCE FOR NYC'S ANIMALS INC
  • Who funds ANIMAL BALANCE
  • Who funds CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF HARLINGEN
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR GREATER SAVANNAH
  • Who funds LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC
  • Who funds PAWS FOR LIFE K9 RESCUE
  • Who funds ONE TAIL AT A TIME NFP
  • Who funds LYNCHBURG HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds FJC
  • Who funds Humane Society of Southern Arizona
  • Who funds SOURIS VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds Acadiana Animal Aid
  • Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC
  • Who funds FRESNO HUMANE ANIMAL SERVICES
  • Who funds DELAWARE COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds FixNation Inc
  • Who funds SPAY NEUTER INITIATIVE PROGRAM

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Petco LoveTX221× affinity289 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Petco Love · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · Banfield Foundation · BISSELL Pet Foundation · Petsmart Charities Inc · Greater Good Charities · Humane World for Animals Inc · The Michelson Found Animals Foundation Inc · Pedigree Foundation · The Grey Muzzle Organization · Vca Charities

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Best Friends Animal Society funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Tlc Petsnip Inc1% of income from government
  • People for Animals Inc1% of income from government
  • Halifax Humane Society Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
46report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Best Friends Animal Society?

Find your warmest path to Best Friends Animal Society through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 894 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph