Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

HUMANE SOCIETY OF COWLITZ COUNTY

HUMANE SOCIETY OF COWLITZ COUNTY (Washington) receives grants from 16 organizations whose IRS filings report $458,870 to it, the largest being EVANS VENTURE FOUNDATION ($198,366). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$1.2M
Funders on record
16
Grants received
$459k
Net assets
$0
7/16 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 7%
01What it does

What Humane Society of Cowlitz County does

Mission

We will promote the humane treatment of people and animals through education, advocacy, and services.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

On its FY2024 return the organization reported a significant change in how it conducts a program.

Articles of dissolution filed with the washington secretary of state and assets donated to the vancouver humane society & spca (dba humane society of southwest washington) 12/31/2024.

Its own explanation, from Schedule O of that return (Part III, line 3).

  1. To provide a shelter where unwanted animals can be brought for adoption, foster-to-adopt, or transport.

    $683,555 spent$382,694 earned by the program
    50% of program spending
  2. To provide animal control and licensing for 14,000 square miles and service the population of 105,000 in cowlitz county including the five incorporated cities within that county.

    $410,133 spent$38,393 earned by the program
    30% of program spending
  3. To provide a crematory where deceased animals can be disposed.

    $68,356 spent$37,055 earned by the program
    5% of program spending
  4. Medical services - spay and neuter of impounded pets, and for cats this service is provided to the public. Vaccines and identification microchips for adopted pets. Care of shelter animals. Public education - provide schools and public education programs for humane treatment and kindness to animals, pet responsibility and the importance of spay and neuter of pets to help reduce the population of unaltered animals.

    $205,064 spent$395,898 earned by the program
    15% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,367,108.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($954k) Expenses 100 ($1.1M) Net assets 100 ($632k)2018 Revenue 124 ($1.2M) Expenses 110 ($1.2M) Net assets 102 ($647k)2019 Revenue 161 ($1.5M) Expenses 126 ($1.3M) Net assets 139 ($877k)2020 Revenue 169 ($1.6M) Expenses 112 ($1.2M) Net assets 236 ($1.5M)2021 Revenue 167 ($1.6M) Expenses 121 ($1.3M) Net assets 287 ($1.8M)2022 Revenue 302 ($2.9M) Expenses 164 ($1.7M) Net assets 465 ($2.9M)2023 Revenue 236 ($2.3M) Expenses 208 ($2.2M) Net assets 473 ($3.0M)2024 Revenue 121 ($1.2M) Expenses 155 ($1.6M) Net assets 0 ($0)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (121)Expenses (155)Net assets (0)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $3.2M to $0 (−100%).

$732k
$789k
$985k
$1.6M
$1.9M
$3.0M
$3.2M
$0
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 49% · 2018 51% · 2019 50% · 2020 50% · 2021 51% · 2022 32% · 2023 41% · 2024 10%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$109k
’17
$14k
’18
$203k
’19
$415k
’20
$308k
’21
$1.1M
’22
$43k
’23
−$493k
’24
2.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Darren Ullmann

Executive director

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed101211109101010
Joined·+4+1+1+0+1+1+0
No longer listed·2221010
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 5 funders, grant income rose $17k → $39k.

4 of 16 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 8% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of HUMANE SOCIETY OF COWLITZ COUNTY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

HUMANE SOCIETY OF COWLITZ COUNTY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 43% of grant income and the top three 77%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

41% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund HUMANE SOCIETY OF COWLITZ COUNTY.

43%
largest funder
77%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 47% · 2018 30% · 2019 55% · 2020 47% · 2021 89% · 2022 77% · 2023 51% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

40% of HUMANE SOCIETY OF COWLITZ COUNTY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 44% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

55% of HUMANE SOCIETY OF COWLITZ COUNTY's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA
NY
MA
OH
CA
UT
KS
NC
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $35k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like HUMANE SOCIETY OF COWLITZ COUNTY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 15%Fundraising 2%

Governance

9
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for HUMANE SOCIETY OF COWLITZ COUNTY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF COWLITZ COUNTY?
HUMANE SOCIETY OF COWLITZ COUNTY (Washington) receives grants from 16 organizations whose IRS filings report $458,870 to it, the largest being EVANS VENTURE FOUNDATION ($198,366). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does HUMANE SOCIETY OF COWLITZ COUNTY have?
IRS filings report 16 organizations giving $458,870 in grants to HUMANE SOCIETY OF COWLITZ COUNTY, 7 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of HUMANE SOCIETY OF COWLITZ COUNTY?
EVANS VENTURE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $198,366 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like HUMANE SOCIETY OF COWLITZ COUNTY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Humane Society of Cowlitz County →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 16 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing