Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Bakersfield Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Bakersfield Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (California) receives grants from 13 organizations whose IRS filings report $248,559 to it, the largest being THE VIRGINIA AND ALFRED HARRELL FOUNDATION ($75,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$2.8M
Funders on record
13
Grants received
$249k
Net assets
$2.3M
5/13 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 6%
01What it does

What Bakersfield Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals does

Mission

To provide a home with adequate food, shelter, and care for all animals entrusted to the Society within the limits of its financial ability. To educate the public and enlist its help by actively promoting adoptions, memberships, donations, and responsible pet ownership.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Pet care and adoption; public education concerning responsible pet ownership.

    $2,691,439 spent$2,627,563 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $2,691,439.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.7M) Expenses 100 ($1.6M) Net assets 100 ($2.7M)2018 Revenue 85 ($1.4M) Expenses 109 ($1.7M) Net assets 89 ($2.4M)2019 Revenue 85 ($1.4M) Expenses 108 ($1.7M) Net assets 78 ($2.1M)2020 Revenue 94 ($1.6M) Expenses 113 ($1.8M) Net assets 70 ($1.9M)2021 Revenue 93 ($1.5M) Expenses 99 ($1.5M) Net assets 70 ($1.9M)2022 Revenue 158 ($2.6M) Expenses 130 ($2.0M) Net assets 91 ($2.5M)2023 Revenue 142 ($2.4M) Expenses 150 ($2.3M) Net assets 92 ($2.5M)2024 Revenue 159 ($2.6M) Expenses 172 ($2.7M) Net assets 90 ($2.4M)2025 Revenue 169 ($2.8M) Expenses 188 ($2.9M) Net assets 85 ($2.3M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (169)Expenses (188)Net assets (85)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $2.1M to $2.6M (+21%).

$2.8M
$2.5M
$2.3M
$2.3M
$2.1M
$2.6M
$2.7M
$2.8M
$2.6M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

11% of Bakersfield Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (74% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,657 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$96k
’17
−$295k
’18
−$285k
’19
−$206k
’20
−$1k
’21
$581k
’22
$18k
’23
−$54k
’24
−$134k
’25
4.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed91010101010111011
Joined·+1+2+0+3+0+4+1+1
No longer listed·02030320
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 3 funders, grant income fell $95k → $26k.

4 of 13 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 21% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Bakersfield Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Bakersfield Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals leans on a few funders — its largest provides 30% of grant income and the top three 71%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

61% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Bakersfield Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.

30%
largest funder
71%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 63% · 2018 100% · 2019 87% · 2020 72% · 2021 55% · 2022 62% · 2023 63% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

30% of Bakersfield Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 38% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

Bakersfield Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals draws 51% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 7 states in all.

WA
NY
CA
UT
VA
AZ
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $51k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Bakersfield Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals's revenue grew 69% between 2017 and 2025.

Operating margin−5% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve4.2mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)7% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 717 animals nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like Bakersfield Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

92% of spending goes to programs.

Program 92%Management 6%Fundraising 2%

Governance

11
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

87%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Bakersfield Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Bakersfield Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals?
Bakersfield Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (California) receives grants from 13 organizations whose IRS filings report $248,559 to it, the largest being THE VIRGINIA AND ALFRED HARRELL FOUNDATION ($75,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Bakersfield Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals have?
IRS filings report 13 organizations giving $248,559 in grants to Bakersfield Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Bakersfield Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals?
THE VIRGINIA AND ALFRED HARRELL FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $75,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Bakersfield Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Bakersfield Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 13 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing