Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Grey Muzzle Organization

THE GREY MUZZLE ORGANIZATION improves the lives of at-risk senior dogs by providing funding and resources to animal shelters, rescue organizations, sanctuaries, and other non-profit groups nationwide.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
103
Grants FY2025still arriving
34
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Animals$5.8MHealth$150kHousing & Shelter$51kHuman Services$17kCommunity Improvement$16kFood & Nutrition$11kReligion$10k
02FY2025 · 103 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 103 grants below total $1,626,691 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,733,105 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $106,414 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $156k
  • $10k–50k83 grants · $1.5M
$15,000
Median grant
34
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPCA OF WAKE COUNTY$41,200
SPCA FLORIDA$30,000
HUMANE FORT WAYNE INC$26,200
KODIAKCARE CORPORATION$25,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS$25,000
FROSTED FACES FOUNDATION INC$25,000
SHANTI PROJECT$25,000
FRESNO HOPE ANIMAL FOUNDATION$25,000
FLORIDA KEYS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS$25,000
TENNESSEE DACHSHUND RESCUE$25,000
THE ANIMAL FOUNDATION$25,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY$25,000
PEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE$25,000
GATEWAY PET GUARDIANS$25,000
THE PET COTTAGE INC$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NORTHWEST ANIMAL COMPANIONS: $12k → 8%MOSTLY MUTTS ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTION INC: $9k → 8%CENTRAL VERMONT COUNCIL ON AGING: $10k → 9%ASTER AGING INC: $9k → 11%MOSTLY MUTTS ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTION INC: $7k → 8%MOSTLY MUTTS ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTION INC: $7k → 8%MOSTLY MUTTS ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTION INC: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.7M · 123 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

123 repeat relationships — 60 still active in FY2025, 63 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

123
98

Total granted

$4.7M
$862k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+6%

Still filing today

98%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $545k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesReligionScience & TechRecreation & SportsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $86k · revenue +30%
  • SC
    SECOND CITY CANINE RESCUE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $86k · revenue +118%
  • TA
    THE ANIMAL FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2025 · $85k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • CL
    California Labradors Retrievers & More Rescue
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue +1%
  • TB
    THE BOND BETWEEN
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue +6%
  • GA
    GUARDIAN ANGEL BASSET RESCUE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
2
Raskels Rescue
Animals
3
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
4
Safe Haven Inc
Animals
5
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
6
Donna's Love Pet Rescue
Animals
7
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
8
Save a Pet Animal Rescue Inc

Save-A-Pet Animal Rescue believes it is their moral responsibility to protect and improve the lives of abused, abandoned and homeless animals and to place them in loving, permanent homes. They provide spay and neuter services and any…

Animals
9
Paws Animal Rescue Center

To help rescue unwanted pets

Animals
10
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
11
Rescue Coop
Animals
12
Happy Acres Pet Rescue
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint Frances Animal Center and the most unlike its peers is Runaways Animal Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and ShelterChristian Missionary Organi…Community FoundationsCommunity FoundationsSenior Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%26%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.4%1/257
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,308

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

245 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 245 of the 263 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
67
Early backer (in before they grew)
242/245
Grantees still filing
158/245
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

+173 more — $4,949,031 · Animals+173 moreSHELTER FROM THE STORM ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $76,450 · OtherSHANTI PROJECT — $40,000 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY — $37,000 · OtherMAX'S HELPING PAWS FOUNDATION — $32,700 · OtherLIVE LOVE ANIMAL SERVICES INC — $31,000 · OtherKNOXVILLE-KNOX COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING — $30,500 · OtherMain Line Animal Rescue Inc — $25,000 · OtherFAIRY TAIL ENDINGS INC — $22,237 · OtherMORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $16,200 · Other+10 more — $103,250 · OtherFound House-Interfaith Housing Network — $61,000 · ReligionPEAK LAB RESCUE INC — $22,500 · ReligionFOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL CARE & EDUCATION — $77,500 · Science & TechMostly Mutts Animal Rescue and Adoption Inc — $28,500 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST ANIMAL COMPANIONS — $12,000 · Human ServicesCENTRAL VERMONT COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE PET PROJECT FOR PETS INC — $29,500 · HealthFOOTBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · Philanthropy
Animals$4,949,031Other$414,337Religion$83,500Science & Tech$77,500Human Services$50,500Health$29,500Philanthropy$20,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC — $86,475 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND CITY CANINE RESCUE — $86,100 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetTHE ANIMAL FOUNDATION — $85,212 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $82,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL CARE & EDUCATION — $77,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetSHELTER FROM THE STORM ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $76,450 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetJACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $73,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF AUSTIN & TRAVIS COUNTY INC — $71,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetFIX OUR FERALS — $71,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetPEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE — $69,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMUTTVILLE — $68,900 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLittle Shelter Animal Adoption Center Inc — $68,900 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHumane Society of North Texas — $66,257 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE INC — $64,960 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetPET COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $64,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetVIRGINIA BEACH SPCA — $62,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY SPAY NEUTER INITIATIVE PA — $62,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFound House-Interfaith Housing Network — $61,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNMDOG Inc — $60,500 over 7y, 4.7% of budgetFOREVER LOVED PET SANCTUARY — $59,983 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY — $58,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPOODLE AND POOCH RESCUE INC — $57,575 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetKODIAKCARE CORPORATION — $56,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetKENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE — $55,728 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF HOMELESS ANIMALS — $55,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetSTOP THE SUFFERING RESCUE — $52,500 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS — $51,661 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNORFOLK SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC — $51,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF FRIDAY HARBOR — $50,963 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetTENNESSEE DACHSHUND RESCUE — $50,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ROCHESTER & MONROE COUNTY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO — $50,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG AT HEART SENIOR PET ADOPTIONS — $50,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetSENIORS PET ASSISTANCE NETWORK — $50,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetCOMPASSION WITHOUT BORDERS — $49,420 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSPCA INC — $48,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetKOHALA ANIMAL RELOCATION & EDUCATION SERVICE — $48,238 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetMERCY CRUSADE INC — $47,800 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPAWS ATLANTA INCORPORATED — $47,610 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetArizona Humane Society — $47,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBrother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc — $46,200 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTY — $46,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSPOKANIMAL CARE — $45,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY — $41,996 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS WAKE COUNTY INC — $41,200 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSHANTI PROJECT — $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetVETS IN VANS INC — $40,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetHEARTS & BONES ANIMAL RESCUE — $40,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetVIEQUES HUMANE SOCIETY & ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $39,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC
  • Who funds SECOND CITY CANINE RESCUE
  • Who funds THE ANIMAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL CARE & EDUCATION
  • Who funds SHELTER FROM THE STORM ANIMAL RESCUE INC
  • Who funds JACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF AUSTIN & TRAVIS COUNTY INC
  • Who funds FIX OUR FERALS
  • Who funds PEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE
  • Who funds MUTTVILLE
  • Who funds Little Shelter Animal Adoption Center Inc
  • Who funds Humane Society of North Texas
  • Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE INC
  • Who funds PET COMMUNITY CENTER INC
  • Who funds VIRGINIA BEACH SPCA
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SPAY NEUTER INITIATIVE PA
  • Who funds Found House-Interfaith Housing Network
  • Who funds NMDOG Inc
  • Who funds FOREVER LOVED PET SANCTUARY
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY
  • Who funds POODLE AND POOCH RESCUE INC
  • Who funds KODIAKCARE CORPORATION
  • Who funds KENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HOMELESS ANIMALS
  • Who funds STOP THE SUFFERING RESCUE
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS
  • Who funds NORFOLK SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC
  • Who funds ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF FRIDAY HARBOR
  • Who funds TENNESSEE DACHSHUND RESCUE
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ROCHESTER & MONROE COUNTY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO
  • Who funds YOUNG AT HEART SENIOR PET ADOPTIONS
  • Who funds SENIORS PET ASSISTANCE NETWORK
  • Who funds COMPASSION WITHOUT BORDERS
  • Who funds SPCA INC
  • Who funds KOHALA ANIMAL RELOCATION & EDUCATION SERVICE
  • Who funds MERCY CRUSADE INC
  • Who funds PAWS ATLANTA INCORPORATED
  • Who funds Arizona Humane Society
  • Who funds Brother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's FundCA134.9× affinity94 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Pedigree Foundation · Petco Love · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · Petsmart Charities Inc · Banfield Foundation · Best Friends Animal Society · BISSELL Pet Foundation · Greater Good Charities · Humane World for Animals Inc · Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · The Michelson Found Animals Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Grey Muzzle Organization funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 190%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Central Vermont Council On Aging Inc74% of income from government
  • Spca Inc0% of income from government
  • Leon County Humane Society0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
19get no government money at all
37report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Grey Muzzle Organization?

Find your warmest path to The Grey Muzzle Organization through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 263 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph