Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pedigree Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
93
Grants FY2024still arriving
29
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Animals$7.2MPhilanthropy$132kHuman Services$13kFood & Nutrition$7kHousing & Shelter$2kHealth$1k
02FY2024 · 93 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k46 grants · $220k
  • $10k–50k40 grants · $599k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $476k
$10,000
Median grant
29
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION$125,000
AUSTIN PETS ALIVE$100,000
PAWS CHICAGO$50,600
WILLIAMSON ANIMAL SERVICES INC$50,440
DALLAS PETS ALIVE$50,000
SHELTER ANIMALS COUNT-NATIONAL DATABASE INITIATIVE$50,000
WASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY SPCA$50,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF TULSA$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
NEBRASKA HUMANE ASSOCIATION$20,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH$17,500
HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLE-KING CO$17,100
COCHRANE & AREA HUMANE SOCIETY$15,227
LUCKY DOG ANIMAL RESCUE$15,000
HIGH FOREST HUMANE SOCIETY$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Pets Are Wonderful SupportLos Angeles: $1k → 14%MOSTLY MUTTS ANIMAL RESCUE AND ADOPTION: $5k → 8%NEW RATTITUDE INC: $1k → 14%International Hearing Dog Inc: $1k → 10%Circle Tail Inc: $1k → 6%Sussex County Fellowship for Animals Inc: $1k → 6%Friends Of Switchpoint Inc: $1k → 10%Mostly Mutts Animal Rescue and Adoption: $1k → 8%New Rattitude Inc: $1k → 14%PAWS AND THINK INC: $6k → 16%Mostly Mutts Animal Rescue and Adoption: $1k → 8%Paws And Think Inc: $1k → 16%PAWS AND THINK INC: $1k → 16%NORTHEAST OHIO SPCA: $2k → 17%Freedom Service Dogs Inc: $1k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $1k → 8%Four Peaks Foundation: $1k → 11%FOUR PEAKS FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%Four Peaks Foundation: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.7M · 308 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

308 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2024, 271 since wound down; 56 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

308
587

Total granted

$4.7M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+30%

Still filing today

80%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $628k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $315k · revenue +30%
  • AH
    AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $255k · revenue +90%
  • WH
    WASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $132k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue +37%
  • DT
    DOGS TRUST USA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -42%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
2
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
3
Raskels Rescue
Animals
4
Safe Haven Inc
Animals
5
Paws Animal Rescue Center

To help rescue unwanted pets

Animals
6
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
7
Animal Rescue and Adoption Agency Inc

An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.

Animals
8
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
9
Shelters and Shelves Rescue Inc

foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs

Animals
10
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
11
Muttsnstuff

Rescue animals

Animals
12
Donna's Love Pet Rescue
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save-a-Pet Inc and the most unlike its peers is Soc Prevt Cruelty Animal Tuw. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%31%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%35%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%13/770
the rest of the field
13%
240,383/1,818,795

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

711 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 711 of the 951 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
273
Early backer (in before they grew)
679/711
Grantees still filing
506/711
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC — $314,500 · AnimalsAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INCAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION — $255,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION+147 more — $3,784,069 · Animals+147 moreAPA — $160,000 · OtherAPAIndividual grant recipient — $90,000 · OtherIndividual grant recip…Individual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherDALLAS PETS ALIVE — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherAGAPE ANIMAL RESCUE — $47,550 · Other+41 more — $650,952 · Other+41 moreGREATER GOOD CHARITIES — $130,000 · PhilanthropyMuddy Paws Rescue — $40,000 · PhilanthropyMAEDAY RESCUE INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyFYIMS INC — $11,000 · Youth Development
Animals$4,353,569Other$1,098,502Philanthropy$180,000Youth Development$11,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC — $314,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION — $255,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY — $131,900 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER GOOD CHARITIES — $130,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNASHVILLE HUMANE ASSOCIATION AKA NASHVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY — $126,335 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $120,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRUFF START RESCUE INC — $115,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetPennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals — $108,020 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetYORK COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $100,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY — $97,100 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of Pima Animal Care Center — $89,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetANIMAL PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION OF MISSOURI — $81,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetBerkeley East Bay Humane Society Inc dba Berkeley Humane — $74,550 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetLUCKY DOG ANIMAL RESCUE — $72,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO — $63,950 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF TULSA — $60,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $55,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL OF NEW YORK CITY INC — $55,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ANIMAL FOUNDATION — $52,540 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAMSON ANIMAL SERVICES INC — $50,440 over 1y, 13% of budgetShelter Animals Count — $50,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetDOGS TRUST USA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetKAUAI HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAGAPE ANIMAL RESCUE — $47,550 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetDELAWARE HUMANE ASSOCIATION — $46,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCaring Hearts for Canines — $44,346 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetKENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE — $42,140 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMuddy Paws Rescue — $40,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMUTTVILLE — $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetKANSAS CITY PET PROJECT — $39,800 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY — $37,600 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND CHANCE PET ADOPTIONS INC — $30,760 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetVANCOUVER HUMANE SOCIETY AND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSan Antonio Pets Alive Inc — $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA SPCA INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH — $28,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRENEGADE PAWS RESCUE INC — $27,530 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SUMMIT COUNTY — $27,050 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY — $26,050 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetArizona Humane Society — $25,828 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS — $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetACTION PROGRAM FOR ANIMALS — $25,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY — $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAnimal Rescue Corps Inc — $25,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF HOMELESS ANIMALS — $25,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHELPING HANDS HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $24,400 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHONOR SANCTUARY INC — $22,905 over 2y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

BISSELL Pet FoundationThe Duffield Family F…Petco LoveThe Grey Muzzle Organ…The American Society …Best Friends Animal S…Petsmart Charities IncGreater Good CharitiesBanfield FoundationHumane World for Anim…Healthy Paws Foundati…The Michelson Found A…
BISSELL Pet FoundationMI169.4× affinity160 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: BISSELL Pet Foundation · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Petco Love · The Grey Muzzle Organization · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · Best Friends Animal Society · Petsmart Charities Inc · Greater Good Charities · Banfield Foundation · Humane World for Animals Inc · Healthy Paws Foundation · The Michelson Found Animals Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pedigree Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
40report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 951 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home