· Public charity
Artsfund
ARTSFUND strengthens the community by supporting the arts through leadership, advocacy, and grant making.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 624 grants below total $12,185,135 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $12,550,135 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $365,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k146 grants · $1.1M
- $10k–50k453 grants · $8.2M
- $50k–250k24 grants · $2.4M
- $250k+1 grant · $548k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SHUNPIKE | $547,500 |
| NORTHWEST FILM FORUM | $229,490 |
| SEATTLE OPERA | $169,520 |
| SEATTLE ART MUSEUM | $167,280 |
| SEATTLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $154,770 |
| PACIFIC NORTHWEST BALLET | $154,730 |
| THE 5TH AVENUE THEATRE ASSOCIATION | $123,720 |
| SEATTLE REP | $109,040 |
| ACT THEATRE | $108,410 |
| VILLAGE THEATRE | $101,740 |
| WING LUKE MUSEUM OF THE ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN EXPERIENCE | $97,736 |
| THE VERA PROJECT | $96,258 |
| HENRY GALLERY ASSOCIATION INC DBA HENRY ART GALLERY | $86,670 |
| TACOMA ARTS LIVE | $82,950 |
| SEATTLE THEATRE GROUP | $82,841 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $804k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
525 repeat relationships — 454 still active in FY2024, 71 since wound down; 146 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFARTSFUND FOUNDATION3× · 2020–2022 · $7.3M · revenue +0% · 93% of their budget
- SASEATTLE ART MUSEUM8× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +0%
PACIFIC NORTHWEST BALLET ASSOCIATION8× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +2%
Funded once
- JFJAKT FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $43k · revenue +60% · 28% of their budget
- NTNORTHWEST TAP CONNECTIONone grant, 2020 · $35k
- AAALLIED ARTS ASSOCIATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $35k · revenue +27%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Musical and other cultural performances and music education for youth
Philharmonia Northwest contributes to the vitality of the classical music community in the Pacific Northwest by presenting professional concerts highlighting the diverse past and present repertoire for chamber orchestra. It is also…
Provide a low cost theatre options for the community of washington
Gather diverse and talented musicians, professionals and amateurs, to curate and perform orchestral repertoire that uplifts, inspires, and celebrates live performances, as well as offer educational activities concerning music.
18th & Union's mission is to sustain an affordable, inclusive, and intimate space that nurtures art and community. 18th & Union maintains a 48-seat performance space, including lobby, restrooms, storage, and theatrical lighting, sound, and…
NCW Arts nurtures our region by uplifting and connecting artists and communities throughout North Central Washington.
Arx Duos mission is to inspire the creation of new music through equal collaboration with artists, highest quality presentation from the stage, and authentic engagement with audiences and communities everywhere.
To promote an arts-rich enviroment in the Columbia Gorge, in which novices as well as well-established artists and performers discover and develop their full creative potential.
Arts education by community arts building and bringing and giving local artists a venue to bring their art to the local community
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tacoma Arts Live and the most unlike its peers is Encanto Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
892 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 892 of the 1,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARTSFUND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC NORTHWEST BALLET ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE OPERA ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE REPERTORY THEATRE ↗
- Who funds 5TH AVENUE THEATRE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE HENRY GALLERY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds A CONTEMPORARY THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE THEATRE ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S THEATRE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE THEATRE GROUP ↗
- Who funds SHUNPIKE ↗
- Who funds WING LUKE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TACOMA ARTS LIVE ↗
- Who funds Tacoma Art Museum ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds ON THE BOARDS ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST FILM FORUM ↗
- Who funds Town Hall Association ↗
- Who funds EXPERIENCE LEARNING COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds Spectrum Dance Theater ↗
- Who funds National Nordic Museum ↗
- Who funds The Vera Project ↗
- Who funds Seattle Chamber Music Festival ↗
- Who funds Artist Trust ↗
- Who funds Earshot Jazz Society of Seattle ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE JAZZ ORCHESTRA DBA SEATTLE REPERTORY JAZZ ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds SIFF ↗
- Who funds RICHARD HUGO HOUSE ↗
- Who funds BURKE MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds INTIMAN THEATRE ↗
- Who funds CHARLES & EMMA FRYE FREE PUBLIC ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Book-It Repertory Theatre ↗
- Who funds Flying House Productions ↗
- Who funds Velocity Dance Center ↗
- Who funds SYMPHONY TACOMA ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds HILLTOP ARTISTS IN RESIDENCE ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Humanities Washington · The Norcliffe Foundation · School's Out Washington · Raynier Institute & Foundation · Dv & Ida McEachern Charitable Tr · The Conru Foundation · Philanthropy Northwest · Wyman Youth Trust · Seattle Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · Inatai Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Artsfund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.