Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

BREMERTON HISTORICAL SHIPS ASSOCIATION

BREMERTON HISTORICAL SHIPS ASSOCIATION (Washington) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $89,649 to it, the largest being TIN CAN SAILORS INC ($41,215). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$574k
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$90k
Net assets
$1.3M
3/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 17%
01What it does

What Bremerton Historical Ships Association does

Mission

The Bremerton Historic Ships Association's primary purpose is to achieve heritage awareness, educational enhancement, memorial recognition, revitalization & economic development, and naval & maritime services recognition and appreciation.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. The Bremerton Historic Ships Association's primary purpose is to achieve heritage awareness, educational enhancement, memorial recognition, revitalization & economic development, and naval & maritime services recognition and appreciation. The organization preserves the historic vessel USS Turner Joy, and offers tours to the general public. Displays of historical artifacts are collected and preserved for the public's benefit. The organization also conducts educational events such as public speaking forums, hosts veteran groups to share their stories and experiences with the public, operates a gift shop with related maritime and commemorative items, and organizes various outreach programs for the general public, including STEM types of programs for school-aged children.

    $482,644 spent$489,136 earned by the program
    100% of program spending
  2. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $482,644.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.0M) Expenses 100 ($392k) Net assets 100 ($1.2M)2018 Revenue 56 ($576k) Expenses 126 ($493k) Net assets 92 ($1.1M)2019 Revenue 43 ($439k) Expenses 125 ($488k) Net assets 89 ($1.1M)2020 Revenue 10 ($100k) Expenses 58 ($227k) Net assets 79 ($939k)2021 Revenue 54 ($551k) Expenses 91 ($357k) Net assets 95 ($1.1M)2022 Revenue 48 ($496k) Expenses 118 ($462k) Net assets 98 ($1.2M)2023 Revenue 49 ($505k) Expenses 121 ($472k) Net assets 100 ($1.2M)2024 Revenue 56 ($574k) Expenses 132 ($519k) Net assets 105 ($1.3M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (56)Expenses (132)Net assets (105)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $980k to $1.2M (+21%).

$1.2M
$1.1M
$1.1M
$980k
$1.2M
$1.2M
$1.2M
$1.3M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 63% · 2018 14% · 2019 16% · 2020 44% · 2021 56% · 2022 24% · 2023 13% · 2024 12%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$631k
’17
$83k
’18
−$49k
’19
−$126k
’20
$194k
’21
$33k
’22
$32k
’23
$55k
’24
18
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed101010109777
Joined·+0+0+0+0+0+1+0
No longer listed·0001210
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income fell $21k → $84.

Funder
'17
'18
'20
'21
'22
'23
total
$41k
Artsfundunclassified
$23k
funders
2
2
3
2
2
2

2 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 29% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of BREMERTON HISTORICAL SHIPS ASSOCIATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

BREMERTON HISTORICAL SHIPS ASSOCIATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 46% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund BREMERTON HISTORICAL SHIPS ASSOCIATION.

46%
largest funder
100%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 50% · 2018 56% · 2020 59% · 2021 99% · 2022 99% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

BREMERTON HISTORICAL SHIPS ASSOCIATION draws 65% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, across 2 states in all.

WA
MA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’20
’21
’22
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $26k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like BREMERTON HISTORICAL SHIPS ASSOCIATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

93% of spending goes to programs.

Program 93%Management 7%Fundraising 0%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

WA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BREMERTON HISTORICAL SHIPS ASSOCIATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds BREMERTON HISTORICAL SHIPS ASSOCIATION?
BREMERTON HISTORICAL SHIPS ASSOCIATION (Washington) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $89,649 to it, the largest being TIN CAN SAILORS INC ($41,215). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does BREMERTON HISTORICAL SHIPS ASSOCIATION have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $89,649 in grants to BREMERTON HISTORICAL SHIPS ASSOCIATION, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of BREMERTON HISTORICAL SHIPS ASSOCIATION?
TIN CAN SAILORS INC is the largest funder on record, with $41,215 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like BREMERTON HISTORICAL SHIPS ASSOCIATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Bremerton Historical Ships Association →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing