Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

MT ADAMS INSTITUTE

MT ADAMS INSTITUTE (Washington) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $287,842 to it, the largest being M J MURDOCK CHARITABLE TRUST ($95,900). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.1M
Funders on record
12
Grants received
$288k
Net assets
$929k
8/12 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 6%
01What it does

What Mt Adams Institute does

Mission

To strengthen the connection between people and the natural world through education, service learning, career development and research.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Sense of place lecture series provided 11 lectures that wre viewed by over 8000 people interested in learning about people's connections to the columbia river gorge.

    $70,474 spent
    8% of program spending
  2. Not described on the e-filed return.

    $1,151 spent
    0% of program spending
  3. Vetswork is a career development program for military veterans interested in public lands/natural resources management careers. The program is supported by a grant from the corporation for national and community services (americorps) and partners such as noaa, lower columbia estuaries partnership, mid klamath watershed council, ca department of fish and wildlife, us fish and wildlife service, and the ottawa, mark twain, tongass, and chugach national forests. 12 participants were engaged in the program in alaska, california, michigan, missouri, oregon, and washington. Their collective impact includes 11,899 hours of volunteer service, over 100 recreation sites maintained, 75 miles of hiking trail maintained, 114 recreation facilities maintained or improved, 839 students engaged with environmental education and projects, 361 trees planted, 368 trees planted, 368 miles of aquatic and riparian habitat improved or surveyed, 10,500 species surveyed, and 12,000 salmon spawned.

    $737,001 spent
    87% of program spending
  4. The institute rents facility space to various organizations and schools to further the educational purposes of their programs. In 2024, the university of washington hosted classes at our facilities with approximately 125 participants

    $37,760 spent
    4% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $846,386.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.3M) Expenses 100 ($1.2M) Net assets 100 ($357k)2018 Revenue 106 ($1.4M) Expenses 109 ($1.3M) Net assets 119 ($425k)2019 Revenue 109 ($1.4M) Expenses 120 ($1.5M) Net assets 110 ($393k)2020 Revenue 135 ($1.8M) Expenses 132 ($1.6M) Net assets 153 ($546k)2021 Revenue 138 ($1.8M) Expenses 135 ($1.7M) Net assets 197 ($703k)2022 Revenue 136 ($1.8M) Expenses 144 ($1.8M) Net assets 205 ($734k)2023 Revenue 181 ($2.4M) Expenses 188 ($2.3M) Net assets 230 ($821k)2024 Revenue 147 ($1.9M) Expenses 145 ($1.8M) Net assets 276 ($987k)2025 Revenue 80 ($1.1M) Expenses 91 ($1.1M) Net assets 260 ($929k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (80)Expenses (91)Net assets (260)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $674k to $858k (+27%).

$439k
$516k
$511k
$674k
$858k
$858k
$999k
$1.1M
$1.1M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 82% · 2018 82% · 2019 82% · 2020 80% · 2021 85% · 2022 95% · 2023 97% · 2024 92% · 2025 87%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

94% of MT ADAMS INSTITUTE’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,293 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$93k
’17
$67k
’18
−$32k
’19
$153k
’20
$157k
’21
$31k
’22
$87k
’23
$166k
’24
−$58k
’25
8.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Aaron Stanton

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2023 and FY2024 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed9101011119121311
Joined·+1+2+1+0+3+7+2+0
No longer listed·02005412
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 4 funders to 2 funders, grant income fell $22k → $3k.

3 of 12 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 13% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of MT ADAMS INSTITUTE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

MT ADAMS INSTITUTE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 33% of grant income and the top three 61%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

46% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MT ADAMS INSTITUTE.

33%
largest funder
61%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 33% · 2018 43% · 2019 71% · 2020 47% · 2021 59% · 2022 100% · 2023 99% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

43% of MT ADAMS INSTITUTE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 67% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

58% of MT ADAMS INSTITUTE's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA
MT
WI
OR
MD

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $38k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

MT ADAMS INSTITUTE is better cushioned than half of the 1,074 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−5% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve8.0mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−3% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,074 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Government funding MT ADAMS INSTITUTE receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $19.3M on record — $19.2M federal, $17k state.

Federal$19.2M
grants $19.0Mcontracts $214k
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of Agriculture$8.9M
  • Corporation for National and Community Service$8.5M
  • Department of Commerce$1.1M
  • Department of the Interior$642k
State$17k
19
20
Top programs
  • PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NON-IT$17k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like MT ADAMS INSTITUTE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

76% of spending goes to programs.

Program 76%Management 23%Fundraising 0%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 2 states

WA
OR

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MT ADAMS INSTITUTE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MT ADAMS INSTITUTE?
MT ADAMS INSTITUTE (Washington) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $287,842 to it, the largest being M J MURDOCK CHARITABLE TRUST ($95,900). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does MT ADAMS INSTITUTE have?
IRS filings report 12 organizations giving $287,842 in grants to MT ADAMS INSTITUTE, 8 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of MT ADAMS INSTITUTE?
M J MURDOCK CHARITABLE TRUST is the largest funder on record, with $95,900 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MT ADAMS INSTITUTE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Mt Adams Institute →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 12 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing