Skip to content

New York · Nonprofit

GREENWICH VILLAGE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION

GREENWICH VILLAGE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (New York) receives grants from 45 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,769,727 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($2,405,345). 27 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 83% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$2.1M
Funders on record
45
Grants received
$3.8M
Net assets
$6.7M
27/45 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 40%
01What it does

What Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation does

Mission

The Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation ("village preservation") preserves the architectural heritage and cultural history of greenwich village, the east village, and noho.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Preservation & advocacy - undertake research, documentation, and advocacy to preserve and extend the historic districts of greenwich village, the east village, gansevoort market, noho, and the south village. Village preservation researches the historic resources in our community, advocates against inappropriate development in our neighborhoods, and provides tools to the general public to help them preserve their communities through civic engagement. We provide regular oversight of our area's landmark districts, conduct research on undocumented buildings, and advocate for threatened properties within our neighborhoods.

    $587,642 spent
    37% of program spending
  2. Membership services, newsletter, & blog- village preservation has 1,842 members, including individuals, families, and businesses. Our bi-annual newsletter features news, research, and cultural and historic information and is distributed to 11,000 individuals.

    $515,171 spent
    32% of program spending
  3. Lectures, tours, and meetings - lectures, tours, exhibits, and programs about the architecture and history of greenwich village, the east village, south village, and noho.

    $321,824 spent
    20% of program spending
  4. Children's educational, broker education, and archive and oral history. Total students served: 2,854.

    $180,444 spent$63,547 earned by the program
    11% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,605,081.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($1.2M) Expenses 100 ($1.2M) Net assets 100 ($3.7M)2019 Revenue 135 ($1.6M) Expenses 112 ($1.3M) Net assets 122 ($4.5M)2020 Revenue 110 ($1.3M) Expenses 112 ($1.3M) Net assets 129 ($4.8M)2021 Revenue 148 ($1.8M) Expenses 118 ($1.4M) Net assets 148 ($5.5M)2022 Revenue 117 ($1.4M) Expenses 128 ($1.5M) Net assets 128 ($4.7M)2023 Revenue 196 ($2.4M) Expenses 140 ($1.6M) Net assets 154 ($5.7M)2024 Revenue 163 ($2.0M) Expenses 154 ($1.8M) Net assets 166 ($6.1M)2025 Revenue 172 ($2.1M) Expenses 170 ($2.0M) Net assets 180 ($6.7M)
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (172)Expenses (170)Net assets (180)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $4.9M to $5.8M (+18%).

$3.7M
$4.5M
$4.8M
$5.5M
$4.9M
$5.8M
$6.7M
$7.1M
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2018 3% · 2019 4% · 2020 14% · 2021 12% · 2022 9% · 2023 2% · 2024 5% · 2025 5%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$32k
’18
$306k
’19
$10k
’20
$395k
’21
−$95k
’22
$723k
’23
$148k
’24
$70k
’25
2.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Andrew Berman

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed2425242325262621
Joined·+1+2+0+2+2+3+1
No longer listed·0310136
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 10 funders to 19 funders, grant income rose $87k → $590k.

10 of 45 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 83% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of GREENWICH VILLAGE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 45 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GREENWICH VILLAGE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 64% of grant income and the top three 75%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

86% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GREENWICH VILLAGE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION.

64%
largest funder
75%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 34% · 2018 64% · 2019 63% · 2020 72% · 2021 65% · 2022 59% · 2023 68% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

46% of GREENWICH VILLAGE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 60% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

83% of GREENWICH VILLAGE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $643k that is directly attributable, 68% of it comes from New York funders.

IL
NY
MA
NJ
CT
DE

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
New York out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $3.1M arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like GREENWICH VILLAGE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New York

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

80% of spending goes to programs.

Program 80%Management 12%Fundraising 8%

Governance

17
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

80%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

NY

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GREENWICH VILLAGE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GREENWICH VILLAGE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION?
GREENWICH VILLAGE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (New York) receives grants from 45 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,769,727 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($2,405,345). 27 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 83% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does GREENWICH VILLAGE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION have?
IRS filings report 45 organizations giving $3,769,727 in grants to GREENWICH VILLAGE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION, 27 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GREENWICH VILLAGE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $2,405,345 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GREENWICH VILLAGE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 45 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing