· Private foundation
Sarah Scaife Foundation Incorporated
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $57k
- $50k–250k96 grants · $13M
- $250k+78 grants · $33M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HERITAGE FOUNDATION | $1,200,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION INC | $1,000,000 |
| BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY THE | $1,000,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY INC | $800,000 |
| GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC | $750,000 |
| TAX FOUNDATION | $600,000 |
| COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC POLICY ALTERNATIVES THE | $600,000 |
| VICTIMS OF COMMUNISM MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC | $600,000 |
| MANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC | $600,000 |
| HERITAGE FOUNDATION | $550,000 |
| FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW & PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES | $550,000 |
| GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC | $550,000 |
| SPIRIT OF AMERICA WORLDWIDE | $525,000 |
| AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY COUNCIL | $520,000 |
| AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH | $500,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against -5% for the ones you funded once.
174 repeat relationships — 140 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $7.8M · revenue +12%- GMGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC5× · 2020–2024 · $7.4M · revenue +3%
- AEAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH5× · 2020–2024 · $7.2M · revenue +57%
Funded once
- TOTRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE THE FLETCHER SCHOOL OF LAW & DIPLOMACYone grant, 2022 · $420k
- MSMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $335k
- OCOKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INCone grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue -6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…
To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…
To educate the public on constitutional issues and public policy matters. We are dedicated to the principles of individual liberty, peace through strength, limited government, free enterprise, and the values embodied in the Declaration of…
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Iri advances freedom and democracy worldwide by developing political parties, civic institutions, open elections, democratic governance and the rule of law.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…
A national non partisan public policy forum to illuminate issues of public policy.
The r street institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, public-policy research organization ("think tank"). our mission is to engage in policy research and outreach to promote free markets and limited, effective government. (continued on…
The center is a non-partisan public policy institution established by former president richard nixon. its current programs focus on energy, security, climate change and u.s. relations with china, japan, russia and the middle east.
The American-German Institute is a center for policy research and scholarship dedicated to the most important political, economic, and security issues confronting Germany and the United States in the global arena. AGI anticipates…
To teach and disseminate educational materials to the public.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ethics and Public Policy Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Center for Advanced China Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
181 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 181 of the 207 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES ↗
- Who funds Foundation For Excellence in Higher Education ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES ↗
- Who funds Hudson Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds TAX FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VICTIMS OF COMMUNISM MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds MANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC POLICY ALTERNATIVES ↗
- Who funds Atlas Economic Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE REASON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds Spirit of America Worldwide ↗
- Who funds COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY ↗
- Who funds THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE ↗
- Who funds EVERGREEN FREEDOM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc ↗
- Who funds STATE POLICY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY INC ↗
- Who funds THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES ↗
- Who funds Mercatus Center Inc ↗
- Who funds FRANKLIN NEWS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASHLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Institute for Humane Studies ↗
- Who funds MOVING PICTURE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR CULTURAL REVIEW ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC ↗
- Who funds THE DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds ETHICS AND PUBLIC POLICY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE ON RELIGION & DEMOCRACY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donors Trust Inc · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Adolph Coors Foundation · The Searle Freedom Trust · John William Pope Foundation · Charles Koch Foundation · Triad Foundation Inc · Diana Davis Spencer Foundation Inc · Charles Koch Institute · The Seminar Network Inc · Garvey Kansas Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sarah Scaife Foundation Incorporated funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
- University of Maryland Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sarah Scaife Foundation Incorporated?
Find your warmest path to Sarah Scaife Foundation Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.