· Community foundation
Minnesota Community Foundation
Purpose: we inspire generosity, advocate for equity and invest in community-led solutions.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2019.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2019
- Under $10k128 grants · $851k
- $10k–50k207 grants · $4.4M
- $50k–250k59 grants · $5.2M
- $250k+27 grants · $20M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH | $2,100,000 |
| MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO | $1,599,474 |
| SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND | $1,526,422 |
| BETTER ANGELS SOCIETY INC | $1,500,000 |
| LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOT | $1,220,859 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION | $1,129,537 |
| LAKEVIEW METHODIST HEALTH CARE CENT | $1,046,848 |
| JUXTAPOSITION INC | $1,002,500 |
| THE US CHARITABLE GIFT TRUST | $960,841 |
| SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC | $954,314 |
| MAYO CLINIC | $675,665 |
| ST ANDREWS EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHU | $650,000 |
| LIFEWORKS SERVICES INC | $632,433 |
| PROJECT SUCCESS-STUDENTS UNDERTAKIN | $563,400 |
| DIGDEEP RIGHT TO WATER PROJECT | $500,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $15.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
313 repeat relationships — 269 still active in FY2019, 44 since wound down; 139 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES FOUNDATION2× · 2017–2019 · $8.6M · revenue +967% · 35% of their budget
- MPMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA3× · 2017–2019 · $4.7M · revenue +5%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION3× · 2017–2019 · $4.3M · revenue +105%
Funded once
- IIINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MINNESOTAgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $750k · revenue +91%
- NPNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $750k · revenue +244%
- MAMinneapolis American Indian Centergraduatedone grant, 2018 · $500k · revenue +211%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.
Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.
Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota
The mission of community shares of minnesota is to create a fair, just and equitable minnesota. community shares of minnesota accomplishes its mission by: supporting collective action to eliminate root causes of inequality and injustice;…
The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.
The foundation cultivates generosity by taking action on the greatest civic, social, and economic needs partnering with nonprofits, facilitating grantmaking, driving research and advocacy, and providing services to donors seeking to make a…
The minnesota state fair foundation's mission is to preserve and improve the historic minnesota state fairgrounds and support state fair programs and projects in agriculture, arts & culture, education, the environment, and history.
The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.
Move minnesota leads the movement for an equitable and sustainable transportation system that puts people first. we are passionate about connecting communities, ending the climate crisis, expanding access to jobs and resources, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Health Care Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Northside Boxing Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
496 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 496 of the 706 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds THE BETTER ANGELS SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds LIFEWORKS SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds NORTHFIELD SHARES ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds IRONWORLD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
- Who funds JUXTAPOSITION ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds LAKEVIEW METHODIST HEALTH CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN HOME ↗
- Who funds AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE US CHARITABLE GIFT TRUST ↗
- Who funds WARROAD MEMORIAL ARENA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT SUCCESS ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GIVEMN ↗
- Who funds HIAWATHA ACADEMIES ↗
- Who funds FAIRMONT OPERA HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MID-MINNESOTA LEGAL ASSISTANCE ↗
- Who funds Minneapolis American Indian Center ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE BANDSHELL PARK INC ↗
- Who funds FRESH MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRACARE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LANESBORO ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds Itasca Community College Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE DIGDEEP RIGHT TO WATER PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Mankato Area Foundation ↗
- Who funds ILAN-LAEL INC DBA ILAN-LAEL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · The Minneapolis Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · Minnesota Historical Society · Pohlad Family Foundation · C K Blandin Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Mardag Foundation · Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Minnesota Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.