Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The McKnight Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$146M
Granted FY2024still arriving
790
Grants FY2024still arriving
34
States reached
$10M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Environment$167MCommunity Improvement$99MPhilanthropy$91MArts & Culture$69MHousing & Shelter$62MEducation$45MFood & Nutrition$35MHealth$26MOther$0
02FY2024 · 790 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k28 grants · $130k
  • $10k–50k185 grants · $4.8M
  • $50k–250k444 grants · $48M
  • $250k+133 grants · $93M
$100,000
Median grant
34
States reached
$2.7B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Minneapolis Foundation$10,000,000
United States Energy Foundation$9,600,000
Minneapolis Foundation$5,000,000
Minnesota Home Ownership Center$2,200,000
Climate and Clean Energy Equity Fund$2,000,000
The McKnight Endowment Fund for Neuroscience$2,000,000
Rewiring America Inc$2,000,000
Community Foundation of Jackson Hole$1,850,000
Greater Minnesota Housing Fund$1,750,000
The McKnight Endowment Fund for Neuroscience$1,500,000
Brick By Brick Training & Development Corporation$1,500,000
Region Nine Development Commission$1,500,000
Brick By Brick Training & Development Corporation$1,500,000
Youthprise$1,500,000
Local Initiatives Support Corporation$1,300,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $11.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Mission Edge San Diego: $200k → 11%The Pivot Fund: $165k → 13%State Power Fund: $500k → 12%Family Freedom Center: $100k → 15%State Power Fund: $400k → 12%State Power Fund: $250k → 12%Living Cities Inc The National Community Development Initiative: $375k → 17%Living Cities Inc The National Community Development Initiative: $250k → 17%Living Cities Inc The National Community Development Initiative: $500k → 14%Living Cities Inc The National Community Development Initiative: $250k → 14%Native Governance Center: $300k → 11%Native Governance Center: $300k → 11%Native Governance Center: $250k → 11%Native Governance Center: $250k → 11%Prepare and Prosper: $150k → 14%Prepare and Prosper: $130k → 14%Prepare and Prosper: $125k → 14%Young Women's Christian Association: $150k → 14%Young Women's Christian Association of St Paul Minnesota: $150k → 14%Project for Pride in Living Inc: $500k → 11%Project for Pride in Living Inc: $250k → 11%Project for Pride in Living Inc: $250k → 11%Project for Pride in Living Inc: $250k → 11%Project for Pride in Living Inc: $250k → 11%Project for Pride in Living Inc: $250k → 11%Minneapolis American Indian Center: $200k → 11%Minneapolis American Indian Center: $150k → 11%Project for Pride in Living Inc: $125k → 11%Project for Pride in Living Inc: $125k → 11%Minneapolis American Indian Center: $120k → 11%Amherst H Wilder Foundation: $425k → 14%Neighborhood Development Center: $250k → 14%Hourcar: $250k → 14%Hourcar: $250k → 14%Hourcar: $250k → 14%Hourcar: $200k → 14%Neighborhood Development Center: $175k → 14%Neighborhood Development Center: $175k → 14%Neighborhood Development Center: $175k → 14%Neighborhood Development Center: $175k → 14%Amherst H Wilder Foundation: $168k → 14%Amherst H Wilder Foundation: $168k → 14%Neighborhood Development Center: $150k → 14%Neighborhood Development Center: $150k → 14%Amherst H Wilder Foundation: $115k → 14%Isuroon: $150k → 11%African Development Center: $150k → 11%African Development Center: $150k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
WV
VA
MD
DE
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of The McKnight Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 61% of the giving stays in MN; read by stated purpose it is 63% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The McKnight Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$514M · 735 repeat orgs$46M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

735 repeat relationships — 449 still active in FY2024, 286 since wound down; 116 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

735
260

Total granted

$514M
$22M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+22%

Still filing today

84%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED STATES ENERGY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $47M · revenue +40%
  • TM
    THE MCKNIGHT ENDOWMENT FUND FOR NEUROSCIENCE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $22M · revenue +4% · 100% of their budget
  • GM
    GREATER MINNESOTA HOUSING FUND
    6× · 2019–2024 · $13M · revenue +581% · 43% of their budget

Funded once

  • TE
    THE ENERGY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $7.3M · revenue -13%
  • MC
    MINNESOTA COMEBACK
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M · revenue 0% · 80% of their budget
  • MH
    Minnesota Housing Finance Agency
    one grant, 2020 · $500k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

2
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

3
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

4
Arts Midwest Incorporated

Arts Midwest works collaboratively with private and public arts supporters to support, inform, and celebrate arts organizations and creative communities across the Midwest. Our mission is to build unprecedented opportunity across the…

Arts & Culture
5
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
6
United Way of Ne Minnesota

United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.

7
Minneapolis Downtown Council

To create an extraordinary downtown minneapolis, applying the core values of leadership, collaboration, advocacy and innovation.

8
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
9
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

10
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

11
Minneapolis Climate Action

Minneapolis Climate Action is a 501c(3) nonprofit founded in 2007 by a group of dedicated individuals committed to addressing climate change in their community. After almost 10 years of working at the neighborhood level and piloting the…

Environment
12
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Build From Within Alliance and the most unlike its peers is The Mcknight Endowment Fund for Neuroscience. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Construc…Ymca Youth DevelopmentWomen & Girls Leadership De…Immigrant Worker SupportLgbtq+ Community SupportLocal Food System Organizat…Pregnancy Support ServicesPublic Library OperationsJewish Community Organizati…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Food Banks and PantriesLocal History MuseumsYouth Sports ProgramsHealth Access Advocacy and …Senior Support ServicesCancer Support ServicesEquine Therapy ProgramsDomestic Violence ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportElementary Literacy TutoringDevelopmental Disabilities …Faith-Based Social ServicesYouth Development ServicesYouth Development CentersCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Policy Research and AdvocacyUnited Way AffiliatesDance Arts OrganizationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Affordable Housing Developm…Environmental Conservation …Community Arts CentersCommunity College Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%5%<5yr12%12%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr17%29%20–35yr16%23%35–55yr18%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%2%<5yr12%17%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr16%28%35–55yr18%12%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%13/981
the rest of the field
10%
3,819/38,008

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

940 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 940 of the 1,155 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

151
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
276
Early backer (in before they grew)
912/940
Grantees still filing
624/940
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED STATES ENERGY FOUNDATION — $47,351,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED STATES ENERGY FOUNDATI…THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION — $27,971,500 · PhilanthropyTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATIONCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE — $7,617,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKS…PROPEL NONPROFITS — $5,858,000 · PhilanthropyWEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE — $5,191,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHLAND FOUNDATION — $4,700,000 · Philanthropy+14 more — $32,110,000 · Philanthropy+14 moreTHE MCKNIGHT ENDOWMENT FUND FOR NEUROSCIENCE — $22,176,100 · OtherTHE MCKNIGHT ENDOWMENT FUND FO…THE ENERGY FOUNDATION — $7,275,000 · OtherTHE ENERGY FOUNDATIONPILLSBURY UNITED COMMUNITIES — $4,500,000 · OtherNORTHWEST MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $6,500,000 · OtherTAKEACTION MN EDUCATION FUND — $4,661,000 · Other+70 more — $88,786,350 · Other+70 moreNEW VENTURE FUND — $8,150,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE F…FRESH ENERGY — $7,048,000 · EnvironmentFRESH ENERGYWINDWARD FUND — $4,225,000 · EnvironmentWINDWARD FUNDCLIMATE AND CLEAN ENERGY EQUITY FUND — $2,500,000 · EnvironmentST PAUL TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION — $2,500,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION MINNESOTA — $2,500,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $2,096,000 · Environment+26 more — $31,950,500 · Environment+26 moreLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $9,162,000 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INITI…SOUTHWEST INITIATIVE FOUNDATION — $5,962,000 · Community ImprovementSOUTHWEST I…SOUTHERN MINNESOTA INITIATIVE FOUNDATION — $5,700,000 · Community ImprovementSOUTHERN MI…INITIATIVE FOUNDATION — $5,552,000 · Community ImprovementINITIATIVE …GREAT PLAINS INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INC — $4,140,000 · Community ImprovementGREAT PLAIN…BME NETWORKS INC — $2,600,000 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR ECONOMIC INCLUSION — $1,813,000 · Community Improvement+14 more — $15,754,000 · Community Improvement+14 moreGREATER MINNESOTA HOUSING FUND — $13,261,500 · Housing & ShelterGREATER MI…FAMILY HOUSING FUND — $11,000,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY HOU…MINNESOTA HOME OWNERSHIP CENTER — $4,006,000 · Housing & ShelterMINNESOTA …NORTHCOUNTRY COOPERATIVE FOUNDATION — $2,600,000 · Housing & ShelterNORTHCOUNT…LAND BANK TWIN CITIES INC — $2,250,000 · Housing & ShelterINQUILINXS UNIDXS POR JUSTICIA- UNITED RENTERS FOR JUSTICE — $1,750,000 · Housing & ShelterMINNESOTA COMMUNITY LAND TRUST COALITION — $1,640,000 · Housing & ShelterAEON — $1,600,000 · Housing & Shelter+8 more — $8,318,000 · Housing & Shelter+8 moreYouthprise — $19,825,000 · EducationYouthpris…UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $8,867,000 · EducationUNIVERSIT…UNIDOS MINNESOTA EDUCATION FUND — $1,752,000 · EducationBuild Wealth MN Inc — $1,735,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $1,735,000 · EducationMINNEAPOLIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN — $1,664,000 · Education+6 more — $5,637,500 · Education+6 moreThe Cowles Center — $2,956,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PLAYWRIGHTS' CENTER INC — $2,336,000 · Arts & CultureSEWARD REDESIGN INC — $2,085,000 · Arts & CulturePangea World Theater — $1,820,000 · Arts & CultureTHE LOFT INC — $1,794,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL — $1,700,000 · Arts & CultureFILMNORTH — $1,651,000 · Arts & CulturePENUMBRA THEATRE COMPANY INC — $1,638,500 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA — $1,627,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN COMPOSERS FORUM — $1,617,000 · Arts & CultureSPRINGBOARD FOR THE ARTS — $1,508,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHERN CLAY CENTER — $1,423,800 · Arts & CultureNative American Community Development Institute — $1,325,000 · Arts & CultureCoalition of Asian American Leaders — $1,150,000 · Arts & CultureMACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC — $1,124,000 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA CENTER FOR BOOK ARTS — $1,113,000 · Arts & Culture+7 more — $5,805,500 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$130,799,000Other$133,898,450Environment$60,969,500Community Improvement$50,683,000Housing & Shelter$46,425,500Education$41,215,500Arts & Culture$32,673,800

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED STATES ENERGY FOUNDATION — $47,351,000 over 5y, 7.2% of budgetTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION — $27,971,500 over 6y, 11% of budgetTHE MCKNIGHT ENDOWMENT FUND FOR NEUROSCIENCE — $22,176,100 over 6y, 100% of budgetYouthprise — $19,825,000 over 6y, 47% of budgetGREATER MINNESOTA HOUSING FUND — $13,261,500 over 6y, 43% of budgetFAMILY HOUSING FUND — $11,000,000 over 6y, 69% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $9,162,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $8,867,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $8,150,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE — $7,617,500 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetTHE ENERGY FOUNDATION — $7,275,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetFRESH ENERGY — $7,048,000 over 6y, 41% of budgetNORTHWEST MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $6,500,000 over 4y, 53% of budgetSOUTHWEST INITIATIVE FOUNDATION — $5,962,000 over 6y, 31% of budgetPROPEL NONPROFITS — $5,858,000 over 6y, 39% of budgetSOUTHERN MINNESOTA INITIATIVE FOUNDATION — $5,700,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetINITIATIVE FOUNDATION — $5,552,000 over 6y, 7.2% of budgetWEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE — $5,191,000 over 5y, 30% of budgetNORTHLAND FOUNDATION — $4,700,000 over 5y, 46% of budgetTAKEACTION MN EDUCATION FUND — $4,661,000 over 6y, 31% of budgetPILLSBURY UNITED COMMUNITIES — $4,500,000 over 6y, 9.6% of budgetWINDWARD FUND — $4,225,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetGREAT PLAINS INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INC — $4,140,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetMeridian Institute — $4,098,000 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MINNESOTA INC — $4,075,000 over 4y, 95% of budgetMINNESOTA HOME OWNERSHIP CENTER — $4,006,000 over 6y, 47% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $3,150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,150,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetInnovia Foundation — $3,150,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetSAINT PAUL & MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $3,115,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetThe Cowles Center — $2,956,000 over 6y, 63% of budgetNEXUS COMMUNITY PARTNERS — $2,852,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetMetropolitan Economic Development Association — $2,762,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetBME NETWORKS INC — $2,600,000 over 4y, 25% of budgetNORTHCOUNTRY COOPERATIVE FOUNDATION — $2,600,000 over 6y, 74% of budgetCLIMATE AND CLEAN ENERGY EQUITY FUND — $2,500,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetST PAUL TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION — $2,500,000 over 6y, 61% of budgetCONSERVATION MINNESOTA — $2,500,000 over 6y, 37% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $2,435,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS — $2,385,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetAMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION — $2,357,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetTHE PLAYWRIGHTS' CENTER INC — $2,336,000 over 6y, 30% of budgetMINNESOTA HOUSING PARTNERSHIP — $2,315,000 over 6y, 25% of budgetV3 SPORTS INC — $2,275,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetLAND BANK TWIN CITIES INC — $2,250,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetGreater Horizons — $2,175,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $2,096,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetSEWARD REDESIGN INC — $2,085,000 over 6y, 19% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED STATES ENERGY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE MCKNIGHT ENDOWMENT FUND FOR NEUROSCIENCE
  • Who funds Youthprise
  • Who funds GREATER MINNESOTA HOUSING FUND
  • Who funds FAMILY HOUSING FUND
  • Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE
  • Who funds THE ENERGY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FRESH ENERGY
  • Who funds NORTHWEST MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST INITIATIVE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PROPEL NONPROFITS
  • Who funds SOUTHERN MINNESOTA INITIATIVE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds INITIATIVE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE
  • Who funds NORTHLAND FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TAKEACTION MN EDUCATION FUND
  • Who funds PILLSBURY UNITED COMMUNITIES
  • Who funds WINDWARD FUND
  • Who funds GREAT PLAINS INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INC
  • Who funds Meridian Institute
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MINNESOTA INC
  • Who funds MINNESOTA HOME OWNERSHIP CENTER
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST
  • Who funds PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Innovia Foundation
  • Who funds SAINT PAUL & MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds The Cowles Center
  • Who funds NEXUS COMMUNITY PARTNERS
  • Who funds Metropolitan Economic Development Association
  • Who funds BME NETWORKS INC
  • Who funds NORTHCOUNTRY COOPERATIVE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CLIMATE AND CLEAN ENERGY EQUITY FUND
  • Who funds ST PAUL TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
  • Who funds CONSERVATION MINNESOTA
  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Target FoundationMN217.5× affinity152 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Target Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · The Bush Foundation · Propel Nonprofits · Headwaters Foundation for Justice · Mortenson Family Foundation · Northwest Area Foundation · Minnesota Humanities Center · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · Jerome Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The McKnight Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Inclusive Prosperity Capital Inc100% of income from government
  • Forth Mobility Fund7% of income from government
  • Ceres Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
71report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 1155 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph