· Private foundation
Enterprise Bank & Trust Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k91 grants · $88k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $148k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $437k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN NEW MEXICO | $100,000 |
| PEDAL THE CAUSE | $79,550 |
| CANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO | $56,000 |
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEW MEXICO | $51,550 |
| URBAN LEAGUE OF METRO ST LOUIS | $50,300 |
| SANTA FE OPERA | $50,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER ST LOUIS | $50,000 |
| METRO EAST HUMANE SOCIETY | $30,021 |
| ST LOUIS AQUARIUM FOUNDATION | $28,500 |
| ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ST LOUIS | $13,500 |
| KITCHEN ANGELS | $10,400 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE | $10,250 |
| HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $10,000 |
| STREET FOOD INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $176k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
143 repeat relationships — 56 still active in FY2024, 87 since wound down; 50 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $211k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SLST LOUIS AQUARIUM AT UNION STATION FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $143k · revenue +6%
- CICOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEW MEXICO3× · 2020–2024 · $112k · revenue +52%
- CFCANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO4× · 2020–2024 · $110k · revenue +2%
Funded once
- UWUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN NEW MEXone grant, 2023 · $100k
- CLCHEERIODICALS LLCSone grant, 2023 · $71k
- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIESone grant, 2021 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.
Our Mission is to solve homelessness as we know it by establishing a pathway for our unhoused neighbors to a home with dignity.
Child safe of central missouri's mission is to respond to and prevent child abuse by providing advocacy, support, and resources to children who are alleged victims of abuse and other traumatic crimes, and to their non-offending family…
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.
Casa of st. louis advocates for abused and neglected children and youth in st. louis by representing their best interests in court and in the community. our vision is that every child lives in a safe permanent home and has the opportunity…
To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.
Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…
To break the cycle of domestic violence and partner abuse for victims and their children by providing shelter, advocacy, counseling and prevention education in our community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Missouri and Kansas and the most unlike its peers is Plastic Beach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
254 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 254 of the 483 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LOS ALAMOS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS AQUARIUM AT UNION STATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds CANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds FULL EMPLOYMENT COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN NEW MEXICO SERVING LOS ALAMOS & RIO ARRIBA CO ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
- Who funds PEDAL THE CAUSE ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS MAKES ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN GOLF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RISE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds THE SANTA FE OPERA ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
- Who funds GROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC ↗
- Who funds KIDS KITCHEN LLC ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds Esperanza Shelter Inc ↗
- Who funds METRO EAST HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds KITCHEN ANGELS INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds UMKC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COOKING WITH KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds SOLACE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds HOAKA MANA ↗
- Who funds STREET FOOD INSTITUTE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · World Wide Technology Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Tsf · Brown Dana Charitable Trust · Youthbridge Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Enterprise Bank & Trust Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Enterprise Bank & Trust Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Enterprise Bank & Trust Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.