· Private foundation
Builders Vision Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $84k
- $10k–50k27 grants · $584k
- $50k–250k208 grants · $26M
- $250k+137 grants · $71M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Chicago Community Foundation | $4,000,000 |
| ForeFront | $3,000,000 |
| CREO Family Office Syndicate | $3,000,000 |
| Rewiring America Inc | $2,000,000 |
| Walton Family Foundation | $1,862,500 |
| Little Village Environmental Justice Organization | $1,000,000 |
| Mission Edge San Diego | $1,000,000 |
| Elevate | $1,000,000 |
| Meridian Institute | $1,000,000 |
| Little Village Environmental Justice Organization | $1,000,000 |
| Everyday People for Change Inc | $1,000,000 |
| Maine Community Foundation Inc | $1,000,000 |
| The Minneapolis Foundation | $1,000,000 |
| Best Friends Animal Society | $1,000,000 |
| Common Market Philadelphia Inc | $1,000,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $6.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 11% of Builders Vision Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
304 repeat relationships — 219 still active in FY2024, 85 since wound down; 96 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WFWalton Family Foundation Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $18M · revenue +44%
- FFOREFRONT5× · 2020–2024 · $12M · revenue +67% · 41% of their budget
- CFCREO FAMILY OFFICE SYNDICATE INC7× · 2018–2024 · $9.6M · revenue +443% · 39% of their budget
Funded once
- PPPlanned Parenthood of Illinoisone grant, 2022 · $2.5M · revenue -8%
UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFone grant, 2022 · $1.5M · revenue -21%- RCRECLAIMING CHICAGO NFPone grant, 2022 · $1.0M · revenue -4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.
The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…
The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…
Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…
Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…
Taproot Earth works with communities to support strategies around the use of water, energy and land.
To empower frontline communities to lead nature-based solutions that advance climate justice, ecosystem restoration, and resilient livelihoods through connecting locally-led initiatives to funding, markets, and technical support.
E3g is a leading international not-for-profit think tank specialising in climate diplomacy harnessing expertise in the politics and economics of climate change.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pfleger Institute of Environmental Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
471 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 471 of the 551 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Walton Family Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds FOREFRONT ↗
- Who funds Crystal Bridges-Museum of American Art Inc ↗
- Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
- Who funds CREO FAMILY OFFICE SYNDICATE INC ↗
- Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Little Village Environmental Justice Org ↗
- Who funds RARE ↗
- Who funds INNER-CITY MUSLIM ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Meridian Institute ↗
- Who funds Maine Community Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood of Illinois ↗
- Who funds Elevate Energy ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds WINDWARD FUND ↗
- Who funds EVERYDAY PEOPLE FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC MEDIA INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds COMMON MARKET PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds SECORE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds REWIRING AMERICA ↗
- Who funds SPRINGBOARD FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds Island Institute ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds COASTAL ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds PERRY INSTITUTE FOR MARINE SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds GARY COMER YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF BIG MARSH ↗
- Who funds MULTIPLIER ↗
- Who funds PRACTICAL FARMERS OF IOWA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Field Foundation of Illinois · The Joyce Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Forefront · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · The Lumpkin Family Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation · Walder Foundation · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Builders Vision Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wild Salmon Center — 49% of income from government
- Ecotrust — 14% of income from government
- New England Aquarium Corporation — 12% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition — 3% of income from government
- Digital Harbor Foundation — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Builders Vision Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Builders Vision Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.